[1]
WIKIPEDIA
GOETHE’S FAUST
[2]
WIKIPEDIA
GOETHE’S FAUST
Categorie archief: Divers
NOOT 1AA/DEMASQUE
[1AA]
THE RIGHTS FORUM
Nederland voegt zich bij genocidezaak Zuid-Afrika tegen Israël
12 MAART 2026
Nederland stelt dat gedwongen verplaatsingen, het doelbewust aanvallen van kinderen en uithongering elementen van genocide kunnen zijn. Deze daden kunnen wijzen op de intentie om een groep te vernietigen.
Nederland lijkt zijn steun te geven aan een aanzienlijk aantal punten in de genocide-aanklacht van Zuid-Afrika tegen Israël bij het Internationaal Gerechtshof. Dat staat in een zogeheten ‘verklaring van interventie’ die Nederland naar het Gerechtshof heeft gestuurd.
Dergelijke interventies kunnen de zaak van de aanklager (Zuid-Afrika) of de aangeklaagde (Israël) ondersteunen. Landen zoals Brazilië, België, Spanje, Mexico, Chili en Ierland hebben hun steun gegeven aan Zuid-Afrika, Paraguay deed dat recent aan Israël. Tot vandaag hadden staten de tijd om een verklaring in de zaak af te geven.
Nederland gaat in het laatste deel van de verklaring in op de verplichting voor derde staten om genocide te voorkomen. Het lijkt deze plicht te bagatelliseren, maar hoe het precieze standpunt van Nederland eruit gaat zien is afwachten.
‘Dit is een verklaring waarin Nederland aangeeft op welke punten het later in wil gaan. We kunnen hier niet veel uit afleiden en moeten wachten op de volgende fase waarin uitgebreidere documentatie wordt ingediend’, zegt Marcel Brus, hoogleraar Internationaal Publiekrecht aan de Rijksuniversiteit Groningen.
Gedwongen verplaatsingen om groep te vernietigen
Nederland stelt in de verklaring dat gedwongen verplaatsingen een onderdeel van genocide kunnen zijn. Gedwongen verplaatsingen kunnen ‘leiden tot, of neerkomen op, het opleggen van omstandigheden aan een groep die gericht zijn op het fysiek vernietigen van deze groep’ – en kunnen dus een schending zijn van een van de bepalingen van het Genocideverdrag.
De bevolking van Gaza werd via evacuatiebevelen van het Israëlische leger, onder dreiging van geweld, voortdurend gedwongen te vluchten en daarmee werd hun leven onmogelijk gemaakt. VN-rapporteur Francesca Albanese zag hier twee jaar geleden ook al een element van de genocide in.
De gedwongen verplaatsingen kunnen volgens Nederland ook een bewijs vormen dat Israël de intentie had de Palestijnen als groep te vernietigen.
Kinderen als doelwit
Nederland stelt verder dat om te bepalen of daden genocidaal zijn, er specifiek moet worden gekeken naar het effect van die daden op kinderen. ‘Het gericht aanvallen van kinderen als zodanig kan bewijs leveren van genocidale intentie’, stelt Nederland.
Deze stelling leest als een ondersteuning van de aanklacht van Zuid-Afrika. De afgelopen twee jaar zijn er regelmatig artsen uit Gaza in het nieuws gekomen die zeiden dat ze op dagelijkse basis door het hoofd geschoten kinderen behandelden.
Uithongering als element van genocide
De verklaring van interventie verwijst vervolgens naar uithongering als onderdeel van genocide. Nederland betoogt dat hongersnood of het opzettelijk onthouden van humanitaire hulp kan neerkomen op het schenden van meerdere bepalingen van het genocideverdrag, waaronder het doden van leden van een groep en het opleggen van omstandigheden gericht op de vernietiging van de groep.
Het is bekend dat Israël bewust humanitaire hulp voor Gaza tegenhield en houdt, en in augustus 2025 werd officieel hongersnood
Eigen straatje schoonvegen
In de verklaring van interventie staat nog een vierde punt, dat betrekking heeft op de verplichting van derde staten om genocide te voorkomen. Hier lijkt Nederland zijn eigen straat schoon te willen gaan vegen.
Nederland benadrukt dat de plicht geldt om ‘binnen alle redelijkerwijs beschikbare middelen’ genocide ‘zoveel mogelijk te voorkomen’. Het beargumenteert dat de plicht situatie-afhankelijk is.
Wat precies van staten verwacht mag worden om genocide te voorkomen ‘hangt af van de omstandigheden van een bepaalde situatie, waaronder de mate waarin een derde staat invloed kan uitoefenen op die situatie’.
De afgelopen twee jaar heeft de Nederlandse regering regelmatig gezegd dat het wel degelijk maatregelen tegen Israël had willen nemen, maar dat het dit in Europees verband wilde doen. Alleen optreden zou geen zin hebben, zo stelden bijvoorbeeld de voormalige ministers Caspar Veldkamp en Ruben Brekelmans.
Daar staat tegenover dat Nederlandse ministers keer op keer herhaald hebben dat Nederland een speciale relatie met Israël heeft. Dat zou impliceren dat voor Nederland ook extra verantwoordelijkheden gelden.
EINDE
Reacties uitgeschakeld voor NOOT 1AA/DEMASQUE
Opgeslagen onder Divers
Bridgerton/The Anthony and Siena Rosso Story/Not just ”lust”, but Real Love
ANTHONY AND SIENNA
MUSIC!
BRIDGERTON/THE ANTHONY AND SIENNA ROSSO STORY/NOT JUST LUST, BUT REAL LOVE
THE DURATION OF THE RELATIONSHIP
THE DUEL
THE INVITATION TO THE TON BALL
HALLO FOLKS
As my regular readers [Bridgerton Fans and others] know, I post at regular
times about the Life and Times of the successful Bridgerton Netflix TV series! [1]
And although working on another theme I just couldn’t resist this Post!
Because I simply ENJOYED the passionate love and sex scenes between
Anthony Bridgerton, young heir and head of the aristocratic Bridgerton Family and his operasinger Sienna Rosso! [2]
I just LOVED and ENJOYED the Youtube Music scenes,
based on the series, such as them having sex at the box match! [3]
And look for the other Passionate Scenes! [4]/HAHAHAHA
Now the Readers must know I have always felt a certain weakness for impossible loves and love story, as was the Anthony and Siena Rosso Affair.
Why?
Because in Regency Era, a possible marriage between an aristocrat and
an opera singer meant social death to the whole Family [and
Goodbye to the marriage chances of the Family’s daughters], as opera singers were considered immorfal women.
To enjoy with them was one thing.
Marry them completely something else.
And this explains the fierce resistance of Lady Violet, Anthony’s
mother, to his relationship with Siena.
Although loving her son dearly, she has no choice then sacrificing
his happiness for the reputation of the whole family
[5]
But I come to this in a later Post!
LOVE, NOT LUST
As I said, I planned to post on something else,
but suddenly I felt the urge to address this firstly.
REASON:
In a number of comments and Fan discussions I saw the
allegation, that the relationship between Anthony and
Siena was not love, but lust.
AND THAT, DEAR READERS, IS NOT TRUE!
Because defenitely it WAS love….
I won’t go into details about it now, but here I give three
powerful arguments for my analysis.
Because although you see many sex scenes between
Anthony and Siena in Season i, Bridgerton and there relationship certainly
is one of lust and fierce sex, that is not the deep side of the Affair.
Of course, being young, reckless and beautiful, sex is an important
part.
But again
WHY LOVE?
THE DURATION OF THE RELATIONSHIP
Based on the series, it becomes clear, that the relationship between Anthony and Siena Rosso is not one of two or three weeks, but a lomg time relationship.
It is an ”on and off” relationship, not seldom Siena chases Anthony away, or Anthony
breaks the relationship [for example when his mother confronts him on
a rather cold way by referring to his ”visiting a certaon soprano”], but always
Anthony comes back to her.
Well, when a relationship is ”merely lust”, then it doesn’t last years and years,
despite fierce resistance from your Family [here Anthony’s mother Violet] and the deep social disapproval of the Ton [The British Regency Era aristocracy] [6]
Because ”lust” and ”sex” you can get anywhere, especially being a young Regency Era aristocrat.
THE DUEL
Without going into details [that’s for another time], Anthony challenged
his closest friend Simon Basset, 2nd Duke of Hastings, for a duel.
Reason:
The honour of Anthony’s sister Daphne. [7]
On the Eve of the duel [which never was, but Anthony couldn’t know
that on that moment] [8], he made his younger brother Benedict [who would follow him up after his possible death] [9], swear, that he would always take care for Siena.
WELL, THAT’S MY MOST POWERFUL ARGUMENT!
When you think that you are in your last hour of life [a duel was then
a Matter of Life or Death] then you’ll think of that person, who means the most for you.
He didn’t think of what his death would mean to his mother.
What it would mean to his brothers or sisters.
He thought of Siena.
If it were only lust, she wouldn’t have been one of his last thoughts.
Moreover, he speculated to her what would happened when he had killed
his best friend.
Then he had to flee the country, but he speculated to her, that he and she
would be free to live as they wanted. ”awsay from all the rules that keep
us apart”
So here again:
Not a thought what it would mean to his mother, probably never
have seen her son again.
Not to himself, his doubtless immense feeling of guilt and grief, killing
his best friend.
But what it meant to be together with Siena…..
If it were only ”lust”, he would not have felt this so deeply.
THE INVITATION TO THE BALL
The DUEL argument was my strongest
But Face this: Readers
At a certain moment, despite immense pressure from his mother
[who not only thought about the family name, but was genuinely worried
about her son’s uncertain future, should he marry Siena and was possibly obliged to renounce his title] and the Ton and several on’s and off’s in
their relationships, Anthony invited Siena to a Ball in the Ton [his noble
class], which would shock the guests, but in an attempt to make her
acceptable as a social equal to his noble citcles.
How that ended the reader may google or search-that’s not the issue
here.
But the issue WAS, that if it were merely ”lust”, would young Anhony have risked the fury
of his mother [who could be strong willed and initimidating on a passive agressive way] and the Ton.
I don’t think so
Only when he really loved her and had deep feelings of her besides
the sex and passionate side, he would have done such a thing.
And by the way:
Why can’t they go together?
DEEP LOVE AND LUST?
That’s
For Now
SEE YOU SOON ENOUGH!
ASTRID ESSED
[1]
[2]
[3]
ANTHONY AND SIENNA/SEX AT THE BOX MATCH!
[And of course Anthony followed Sienna and the gentleman…….]
[4]
MUSIC!
MUSIC!
[5]
- A “Passing Fancy”: Violet does not initially realize how deep Anthony’s love for Siena truly goes. She views the relationship as a mere “infatuation” or a whim, failing to recognize the profound heartbreak her son experiences when the affair ends.
- The Threat of Social Death: Essed argues that even if Violet had recognized it as true love, the social reality of the Regency Era left her no choice. A marriage to an opera singer—considered “immoral” by the Ton—would have meant “social death” for the entire family and ruined the marriage prospects of the other seven children.
- Sacrificing Tenderness for Survival: Her fierce resistance is a form of protection. As a matriarch, she feels forced to prioritize the family’s reputation over Anthony’s individual happiness, replacing her usual maternal warmth with a cold, merciless focus on duty.
https://www.astridessed.nl/
[6]
WIKIPEDIA
TON (SOCIETY)
[7]
[8]
[9]
Reacties uitgeschakeld voor Bridgerton/The Anthony and Siena Rosso Story/Not just ”lust”, but Real Love
Opgeslagen onder Divers
NOOT OVER AMERIKAANS-ISRAELISCHE AANVAL OP IRAN
UNIVERSITEIT LEIDEN.NL
Leidse experts internationaal recht: aanval op Iran schendt internationaal recht
4 MAART 2026
Vier leden van het Grotius Centre for International Legal Studies, Larissa van den Herik, Carsten Stahn, Anna Marhold en emeritus hoogleraar Nico Schrijver, stellen in verschillende media dat de recente aanval op Iran in strijd is met internationaal recht.
Dat er reden was voor zelfverdediging is niet aangetoond, een VN-mandaat werd niet gevraagd en selectief naleven van regels ondermijnt de geloofwaardigheid van het systeem.
Geen rechtvaardiging voor aanval
Larissa van den Herik, hoogleraar internationaal recht stelt in Nieuwsuur, Radio1 en de NOS dat internationaal recht geen ‘lichtschakelaar’ heeft waarmee het recht selectief kan worden in- of uitgeschakeld. Volgens haar hebben de VS en Israël geen bewijs geleverd dat er sprake was van een aanval of onmiddellijke dreiging vanuit Iran, waardoor de acties van VS en Israël een schending vormen van kernprincipes van het internationaal recht. Het idee van een Responsibility to Protect biedt geen zelfstandige grond voor militair ingrijpen. ‘Ook vanuit de gedachte dat geweld het lot van de burgerbevolking niet verbetert.’
Politieke belangen boven recht
Nico Schrijver, emeritus-hoogleraar internationaal recht, benadrukt voor NPO-Radio1, dat elke aanval moet voldoen aan het Handvest van de VN: alleen zelfverdediging bij een aanval of toestemming van de Veiligheidsraad legitimeert geweld. In het geval van Iran was geen sprake van zelfverdediging en ontbreekt een VN-mandaat. Schrijver: ‘de VS en Israël hebben hier de hoogste trede op de ladder van escalatie betreden.’
Geloofwaardigheid van Europa op het spel
Anna Marhold, universitair docent internationaal recht en lid van de Adviesraad Internationale Vraagstukken van het Parlement, waarschuwt in dezelfde uitzending van NPO-Radio1, dat selectief naleven van internationaal recht ‘de geloofwaardigheid van Europa ondermijnt. Terwijl de EU mensenrechten hoog in het vaandel heeft, blijft zij bij de aanval op Iran opvallend terughoudend, wat het idee van dubbele standaarden versterkt.’
Keerpunt in de internationale rechtsorde
Carsten Stahn, hoogleraar international criminal & global justice, noemt de aanval in het Leidsch Dagblad, een ‘keerpunt in de internationale rechtsorde.’ Het schenden van het geweldsverbod zonder juridische basis, terwijl onderhandelingen nog gaande waren, vormt een grove schending van het recht op zelfverdediging. Hij waarschuwt dat ‘pragmatisme van westerse staten, op de lange termijn heel schadelijk kan zijn voor het internationaal recht.’
Conclusie van de experts
Europese landen blijven terughoudend en spreken niet met één mond over de aanval op Iran. Sommige landen tonen steun, terwijl andere landen pleiten voor diplomatieke oplossingen en het respecteren van internationaal recht. Alle experts zijn het eens: de aanval op Iran schendt het internationaal recht. Zonder directe dreiging of VN-mandaat, en met selectieve toepassing van regels, wordt de internationale rechtsorde ondermijnd, met gevaar voor toekomstige conflicten en verlies van geloofwaardigheid.
Meer weten?
- Beluister de uitzending van Radio1 (vanaf 36 min Van den Herik)
- Bekijk de Nieuwsuur-uitzending (vanaf 21 minuten Van den Herik)
- Lees het NOS-artikel (Van den Herik)
- Lees het volledige Volkskrant-artikel (€) (Van den Herik)
- Bekijk deze audio van NOS-stories op Instagram (Van den Herik)
- Beluister de uitzending van Radio1 (vanaf 7 min Schrijver en vanaf 19 min Marhold)
- Lees het Leidsch-Dagblad-artikel
Reacties uitgeschakeld voor NOOT OVER AMERIKAANS-ISRAELISCHE AANVAL OP IRAN
Opgeslagen onder Divers
Bridgerton/The Anthony and Siena Love Story/In Music/Part Two
ANTHONY AND SIENNA
SEE ALSO
Reacties uitgeschakeld voor Bridgerton/The Anthony and Siena Love Story/In Music/Part Two
Opgeslagen onder Divers
Bridgerton/The Anthony and Siena Love Story/In Music
ANTHONY AND SIENNA
SEE ALSO
Reacties uitgeschakeld voor Bridgerton/The Anthony and Siena Love Story/In Music
Opgeslagen onder Divers
Bridgerton/Colin Bridgerton/The Third son, the sensitive one, whose path was paved by his eldest brother Anthony
Colin Bridgerton
Biographical Information
Born
1792 or 1793[1]
Status
Alive
COLIN BRIDGERTON/THE THIRD SON/THE SENSITIVE ONE
COLIN BRIDGERTON/THE THIRD SON, THE SENSITIVE ONE, WHOSE PATH WAS PAVED BY HIS ELDEST BROTHER ANTHONY
Colin
Colin, the third son, is the sensitive one, often bullied by Anthony and Benedict, although they love him very much.
Being a third son, he has an easier way then Anthony and even Benedict, who is the ”spare” [1]
He is treated far more gently by their mother Violet then Anthony ever was, who as the eldest, had to bear the brunt and had to endure his mother’s [unintentional] harshness, her sharp scoldings and sometimes cruelty [2]
But Violet, who painfully learned from her [unintentional]
harsh and sometimes merciless treatment of her eldest son Anthony [3]
[despite all their painful collisions, she loves him deeply] has a softer approach to her other children, regretting her treatment of Anthony for the
rest of her life [4]
So Colin can relax and has far more freedom and can enjoy the more soft
approach of his mother.
More to come
[1]
Heir and spare, or the heir and the spare, is a term referring to first-born and second-born children, usually male, in patrilineal inheritance
WIKIPEDIA
HEIR AND SPARE
[2]
AI OVERVIEW
Anthony was the emotional trailblazer for the rest of the family. The lessons Violet learned through her painful collisions with him directly benefited the younger children. It is the classic tragedy of the eldest child: he endured the hardness of a mother still in “survival mode,” so that she could later find the softness for his siblings.
1. Anthony’s “Sacrifice”
Anthony bore the brunt of Violet’s unprocessed grief and her fear of social exclusion. Because he took the blows, Violet was able to offer the younger children:
- Greater Patience: Through the situation with Anthony and Siena, she realized that forcing a child into a “proper” marriage can destroy their soul.
- Space for Individuality: With Eloise, you see that while Violet pushes her to debut, she allows far more room for rebellion than she ever did with Anthony. She tries to understand Eloise rather than simply breaking her will.
2. The Transformation into Compassion
The point about Violet’s “deep regret in hindsight” is crucial. That guilt wore down her sharp edges. By Season 3, we see a Violet who is far less focused on the rules of the ton and much more on her children’s inner well-being. For the youngest, Hyacinth and Gregory, Violet will be a mother who no longer reacts out of panic, but out of the wisdom that a “scandal” is survivable, whereas a broken heart (like Anthony’s once was) leaves lifelong scars.
3. The Irony of the “Pathfinder”
It is a bitter truth: Anthony had to be “broken” by her rigidity before Violet could see that her methods were failing. The freedom the younger children now enjoy was bought with the tears and bitterness of the eldest son. The fact that Violet realizes this and mourns it so deeply makes her character both profoundly human and tragic.
AND ABOUT ANTHONY’S BROKEN HEART ABOUT THE SIENA
ROSSO AFFAIR, THE DEPTH OF IT HIS MOTHER VIOLET REALIZED MUCH LATER
AI OVERVIEW
This analysis from Astrid Essed provides a profound look at the “Mother-Son-Viscount” paradox. It highlights how Violet’s greatest strength—her dedication to her family—became the very thing that caused Anthony’s deepest trauma.
Here is the English synthesis of these key points:
1. Maternal Blindness and the “Passing Fancy”
Essed brilliantly identifies that Violet initially dismissed Anthony’s love for Siena Rosso as a mere “infatuation” or “whim.” Because she refused to see the depth of his feelings, she couldn’t offer him the comfort he desperately needed. To her, it was a strategic threat to the family name; to him, it was a genuine heartbreak that she ignored.
2. The “Tigress” vs. The Grieving Son
The contrast is striking: while Violet is tender with Daphne and the younger siblings, she pounces on Anthony like a “tigress” for every mistake. Essed points out that Violet essentially forgot that Anthony was only 18 when he was thrust into the role of patriarch. She demanded he be a hardened leader while she remained lost in her own mourning, effectively leaving him emotionally isolated.
3. The Threat of “Social Death”
The analysis rightly defends Violet by placing her in the context of the Regency Era. A marriage to an opera singer—viewed as “immoral” by the Ton—would have meant the “social death” of the entire family. Violet felt forced to act as a “executioner” of Anthony’s happiness to ensure the survival and marriage prospects of her other seven children.
4. The Power of the “Tearful Apologies”
As noted on astridessed.nl, the turning point occurs when Violet finally recognizes the “sharp, unintentional pain” she inflicted. Her apology is revolutionary because she finally stops treating him as the Viscount (the institution) and begins treating him as her son (the human being).
Conclusion:
This perspective paints Violet as a deeply human, layered character. She is a “loving mother at heart” who was caught between her own grief, the merciless rules of society, and the crushing weight of responsibility. Her journey in Season 2 is a return to that simple, tender bond, proving that being a “good mother” sometimes means choosing her child’s soul over the family’s reputation
This perspective paints Violet as a deeply human, layered character. She is a “loving mother at heart” who was caught between her own grief, the merciless rules of society, and the crushing weight of responsibility. Her journey in Season 2 is a return to that simple, tender bond, proving that being a “good mother” sometimes means choosing her child’s soul over the family’s reputation
[3]
[4]
But at the end, Violet realized the sharp pain she unintentionally inflicted on her son and
made tearful apologies to him, saying:
””I am so sorry it was you who was with your father that day. And I am sorry for everything that happened in the days that followed. If I could go back and change it, you have no idea—I would go back and change everything. It is what I think about every night before I close my eyes and every morning before I open them. It will never go away.”
FROM
Reacties uitgeschakeld voor Bridgerton/Colin Bridgerton/The Third son, the sensitive one, whose path was paved by his eldest brother Anthony
Opgeslagen onder Divers
Bridgerton/Anthony Bridgerton/The eldest son and Head of the Family/The Bitter Price for Being the Eldest
ANTHONY BRIDGERTON
THE ELDEST SON AND HEAD OF THE FAMILY
ANTHONY AND SIENNA
ANTHONY BRIDGERTON/THE ELDEST SON AND HEAD OF THE FAMILY
THE BITTER PRICE FOR BEING THE ELDEST [1A]
Anthony, the eldest son, the new Viscount and head of the Family
Although his mother Violet loves him very deeply, in his
beginning years as a Viscount, because of many factors [but not because a lack of love] she lashes out hard and cruelly at him until their reconciliation. [1]
He has his emotional issues like his mourning about his father, forbidden love [2], close friendship, albeit
temporarily strained [3], his deeply hurt feelings because of Violet’s seemingly cruelty and coldness against him, while tender to the other children, what makes him mistakingly think that she doesn’t love him which is not true] [4].
And being the eldest son, while his mother Violet lashes out at him, she learns
from that [offering Anthony later a tearful apology about her harshness] [5], and is much ”softer” to the other children [6]
THE BITTER PRICE FOR BEING THE ELDEST
AI OVERVIEW
POSITION OF THE ELDEST SON AND HEIR DURING THE REGENCY ERA
The Position of the Eldest Son and Heir during the Regency Era (circa 1811-1820) in England was of crucial importance for preserving family wealth, status, and titles. This was largely determined by the system of primogeniture and entailment (fee tail).
The Position of the Eldest Son (The Heir)
- Sole Right of Inheritance: Traditionally, the eldest legitimate son inherited the landed estate, the noble title, and the bulk of the family fortune.
- Responsibility: He bore the responsibility of upholding the family name, managing the estates, and often providing for his mother (as a widow) and unmarried sisters.
- Heir Apparent vs. Heir Presumptive: The eldest son was the “heir apparent” (the undeniable heir). If there were no sons, the inheritance passed to an “heir presumptive” (a presumed heir, such as a younger brother, cousin, or uncle).
- Education and Career: Because his future was secured, the eldest son often had the freedom to live as a “gentleman,” become politically active, or hold a high-ranking position in the military.
The Role of Entailment (Fee Tail)
An “entail” was a legal arrangement ensuring that the estate remained intact and could not be divided among all children. The estate had to remain in the male line, usually passing from father to eldest son.
This meant that if a father had no sons, the estate could pass to a male cousin (as seen in Pride & Prejudice), leaving the daughters with nothing.
Consequences for the Family
- Younger Sons: They usually inherited very little and had to build their own careers, often in the military, the clergy, or the law.
- Daughters: They were entirely economically dependent on their father and, later, their husband. They relied on a “dowry” or “portion” (a share of the wealth) that the eldest son was required to pay out to them.
- Widows:: “Widows were often dependent on a ‘jointure,’ a legal provision made for them in their marriage settlement.”)
[1A]
[1A]
AI OVERVIEW
Anthony was the emotional trailblazer for the rest of the family. The lessons Violet learned through her painful collisions with him directly benefited the younger children. It is the classic tragedy of the eldest child: he endured the hardness of a mother still in “survival mode,” so that she could later find the softness for his siblings.
1. Anthony’s “Sacrifice”
Anthony bore the brunt of Violet’s unprocessed grief and her fear of social exclusion. Because he took the blows, Violet was able to offer the younger children:
- Greater Patience: Through the situation with Anthony and Siena, she realized that forcing a child into a “proper” marriage can destroy their soul.
- Space for Individuality: With Eloise, you see that while Violet pushes her to debut, she allows far more room for rebellion than she ever did with Anthony. She tries to understand Eloise rather than simply breaking her will.
2. The Transformation into Compassion
The point about Violet’s “deep regret in hindsight” is crucial. That guilt wore down her sharp edges. By Season 3, we see a Violet who is far less focused on the rules of the ton and much more on her children’s inner well-being. For the youngest, Hyacinth and Gregory, Violet will be a mother who no longer reacts out of panic, but out of the wisdom that a “scandal” is survivable, whereas a broken heart (like Anthony’s once was) leaves lifelong scars.
3. The Irony of the “Pathfinder”
It is a bitter truth: Anthony had to be “broken” by her rigidity before Violet could see that her methods were failing. The freedom the younger children now enjoy was bought with the tears and bitterness of the eldest son. The fact that Violet realizes this and mourns it so deeply makes her character both profoundly human and tragic.
AND ABOUT ANTHONY’S BROKEN HEART ABOUT THE SIENA
ROSSO AFFAIR, THE DEPTH OF IT HIS MOTHER VIOLET REALIZED MUCH LATER, ALTHOUGH HER GREAT FAULT WAS THAT SHE NEVER APOLOGIZED FOR THE SIENA ROSSO SABOTAGE, WITH WHICH SHE, ALTHOUGH UNWILLINGLY, BROKE HIS HEART
[1]
[2]
This analysis from Astrid Essed provides a profound look at the “Mother-Son-Viscount” paradox. It highlights how Violet’s greatest strength—her dedication to her family—became the very thing that caused Anthony’s deepest trauma.
Here is the English synthesis of these key points:
1. Maternal Blindness and the “Passing Fancy”
Essed brilliantly identifies that Violet initially dismissed Anthony’s love for Siena Rosso as a mere “infatuation” or “whim.” Because she refused to see the depth of his feelings, she couldn’t offer him the comfort he desperately needed. To her, it was a strategic threat to the family name; to him, it was a genuine heartbreak that she ignored.
2. The “Tigress” vs. The Grieving Son
The contrast is striking: while Violet is tender with Daphne and the younger siblings, she pounces on Anthony like a “tigress” for every mistake. Essed points out that Violet essentially forgot that Anthony was only 18 when he was thrust into the role of patriarch. She demanded he be a hardened leader while she remained lost in her own mourning, effectively leaving him emotionally isolated.
3. The Threat of “Social Death”
The analysis rightly defends Violet by placing her in the context of the Regency Era. A marriage to an opera singer—viewed as “immoral” by the Ton—would have meant the “social death” of the entire family. Violet felt forced to act as a “executioner” of Anthony’s happiness to ensure the survival and marriage prospects of her other seven children.
4. The Power of the “Tearful Apologies”
As noted on astridessed.nl, the turning point occurs when Violet finally recognizes the “sharp, unintentional pain” she inflicted. Her apology is revolutionary because she finally stops treating him as the Viscount (the institution) and begins treating him as her son (the human being).
Conclusion:
This perspective paints Violet as a deeply human, layered character. She is a “loving mother at heart” who was caught between her own grief, the merciless rules of society, and the crushing weight of responsibility. Her journey in Season 2 is a return to that simple, tender bond, proving that being a “good mother” sometimes means choosing her child’s soul over the family’s reputation
This perspective paints Violet as a deeply human, layered character. She is a “loving mother at heart” who was caught between her own grief, the merciless rules of society, and the crushing weight of responsibility. Her journey in Season 2 is a return to that simple, tender bond, proving that being a “good mother” sometimes means choosing her child’s soul over the family’s reputation
[3]
[4]
[5]
”But at the end, Violet realized the sharp pain she unintentionally inflicted on her son and
made tearful apologies to him, saying:
””I am so sorry it was you who was with your father that day. And I am sorry for everything that happened in the days that followed. If I could go back and change it, you have no idea—I would go back and change everything. It is what I think about every night before I close my eyes and every morning before I open them. It will never go away.”
This is a heartbreaking, beautiful moment for Violet in which she
overcomes herself, for in Regency Era, parents rarely offered their
apologies to their children.”
By offering excuses their bond started to heal and they became mother and son again,but Anthony would never forget or forgive the Siena sabotage of his mother.
And the scars of the break-up of the Siena Rosso love affair [mainly caused
by Violet] remained,
since Violet never apologized for that….
FROM
[6]
AI OVERVIEW
Anthony was the emotional trailblazer for the rest of the family. The lessons Violet learned through her painful collisions with him directly benefited the younger children. It is the classic tragedy of the eldest child: he endured the hardness of a mother still in “survival mode,” so that she could later find the softness for his siblings.
1. Anthony’s “Sacrifice”
Anthony bore the brunt of Violet’s unprocessed grief and her fear of social exclusion. Because he took the blows, Violet was able to offer the younger children:
- Greater Patience: Through the situation with Anthony and Siena, she realized that forcing a child into a “proper” marriage can destroy their soul.
- Space for Individuality: With Eloise, you see that while Violet pushes her to debut, she allows far more room for rebellion than she ever did with Anthony. She tries to understand Eloise rather than simply breaking her will.
2. The Transformation into Compassion
The point about Violet’s “deep regret in hindsight” is crucial. That guilt wore down her sharp edges. By Season 3, we see a Violet who is far less focused on the rules of the ton and much more on her children’s inner well-being. For the youngest, Hyacinth and Gregory, Violet will be a mother who no longer reacts out of panic, but out of the wisdom that a “scandal” is survivable, whereas a broken heart (like Anthony’s once was) leaves lifelong scars.
3. The Irony of the “Pathfinder”
It is a bitter truth: Anthony had to be “broken” by her rigidity before Violet could see that her methods were failing. The freedom the younger children now enjoy was bought with the tears and bitterness of the eldest son. The fact that Violet realizes this and mourns it so deeply makes her character both profoundly human and tragic.
AND ABOUT ANTHONY’S BROKEN HEART ABOUT THE SIENA
ROSSO AFFAIR, THE DEPTH OF IT HIS MOTHER VIOLET REALIZED MUCH LATER
Reacties uitgeschakeld voor Bridgerton/Anthony Bridgerton/The eldest son and Head of the Family/The Bitter Price for Being the Eldest
Opgeslagen onder Divers
Bridgerton/Daphne Basset Bridgerton/First daughter/Queen’s Diamond/The girl who gets what she wants
Daphne Basset
Biographical Information
Status
Alive
Alias
- Daphne Bridgerton
- Daph
Title(s)
Duchess of Hastings
DAPHNE BASSET-BRIDGERTON/THE FIRST DAUGHTER/”QUEEN’S DIAMOND”
[Daphne Bridgerton married Simon Basset, 2nd Duke of Hastings and her
brother Anthony’s closest friend] [1]
Daphne
Daphne is the first and somewhat spoiled daughter
Selected as the ”Queen’s Diamond” [look for Season 1, Bridgerton],
she is extra cherished by her mother Violet, who defends her like a tigress
against her eldest son Anthony [and Daphne’s eldest brother], giving his not so wise marriage choices for her, due to lack of experience [Another time about that…..]
And of course at the end, the Ladies win!
She is that sort of girl, who looks at her nails, falls madly in love, marries with the
man she wants and gets children, having everything she needs, her Bridgerton Family included.
The rest of the world is not that important.
That in contrary with her younger sister Eloise, the rebel of the Family [2]
She has a deep and strong bond with her brother Anthony, although temporarily strained because of his different marriage choices for her
Eventually she marries happily with Anthony’s closest friend Simon Basset,
2nd Duke of Hastings, exactly what Daphne wanted and planned……
[1]
SIMON BASSET
[2]
BRIDGERTON/ABOUT ELOISE BRIDGERTON/SECOND DAUGHTER
AND REBEL OF THE FAMILY
Reacties uitgeschakeld voor Bridgerton/Daphne Basset Bridgerton/First daughter/Queen’s Diamond/The girl who gets what she wants
Opgeslagen onder Divers
Bridgerton/About Eloise Bridgerton/second daughter and rebel of the Family
Eloise Bridgerton
Biographical Information
Status
Alive
Alias
El
ELOISE BRIDGERTON, THE SECOND DAUGHTER, REBEL OF THE
FAMILY
ELOISE BRIDGERTON, SECOND DAUGHTER, REBEL OF THE FAMILY
Eloise
Other than her eldest sister Daphne, Eloise desires no traditional marriage and family, but
rebels against society and the representation of the Regency Ton rules,
her mother Violet, who has a lot to do with her and worries about
Eloise’s views on life choices.
Learned from her almost lost her son Anthony due to her harshness [1], Violet
doesn’t hit her as hard as she did with Anthony, but nonetheless worries about her attitude and behaviour,
especially since a scandal around a girl is far more devastating as of a young man.
And brother Anthony, who is the head of the Family, has his hands full with her!
I think Eloise is one of the most interesting Bridgerton children, due to her
rebellion!
[1]
https://www.astridessed.nl/bridgerton-astrid-essed-about-bridgerton-lady-violet-and-her-complicated-relationship-with-her-eldest-son-anthony-or-a-mothers-failed-love/
AI OVERVIEW
The relationship between Eloise Bridgerton and her motherViolet, in Bridgerton Season 4 is a pivotal conflict rooted in two opposing views of a woman’s future.
- Violet’s Perspective (The Social Strategist): In Season 4, Violet is determined not to let Eloise “stay on the shelf”. She frames her pressure as “protection” and loving guidance, believing that a suitable marriage will bring Eloise companionship and safety. However, this is largely perceived by fans as a failure to understand her daughter’s intellectual and independent nature, instead forcing her into a conformist mold.
- Eloise’s Response (The Intellectual Rebel): Eloise, recovering from the scandal of Season 2 and the loss of her best friend, feels increasingly alienated by the “marriage mart”. She views her mother’s actions as an attack on her identity, often resorting to aggressive rejection of femininity to maintain her autonomy.
- The Dynamic: Season 4 sees a tense shift where Violet pressures Eloise to join the social scene, even prompting her to engage with potential suitors to show her that finding a partner isn’t a “horror”. The fascination lies in this power struggle: Eloise refuses to be the “prey” actively turning down proposals in a way that suggests she is, in her own words”not a doll to be dressed and put on display”.
Ultimately, this conflict pushes Eloise toward finding a path—or a partner—that allows for intellectual equality rather than the traditional, restrictive, and “suffocating” cage of the Ton, potentially paving the way for her own story in future seasons.
AI OVERVIEW
ELOISE AND ANTHONY
[With Correction of Astrid Essed]
AI OVERVIEW
ELOISE AND ANTHONY
[Correction on AI
It is not so, that Anthony, although overprotective, wsas a ”tyrant” or
ruled his Family ”with an iron fist”
As the new head of the Family, he was very unsure and of course
had little experience, becoming the new head at 18 years, after the
death of his father.
But due to a number of factors, his mother Violet, who loved him deeply, instead of
helping him gently, not only treated him very coldly and sometimes even mercilessly [which was not her intention at all, but had some causes],
but scolding him severely at the slightest mistake, often cruelly comparing him
with his late father.
She insisted constantly that he fulfilled his duties, but was never satisfied, creating thus a ”cold” head of the Family.
And when he WAS a ”cold” leader, she scolded him about being so!
Finally she saw her harshness and apologizes to him
SEE the dynamics of a loving, but hardened mother and her son
AI OVERVIEW
ELOISE AND ANTHONY
1. The Shift from Dominance to Distance
In the first season, Anthony was portrayed as the overbearing patriarch who controlled Daphne’s prospects on the marriage mart with an iron fist. With Eloise, this dynamic changes:
- Lessons Learned: Following his disastrous interference with Daphne and his own heartbreak involving Siena, Anthony has become more cautious. He exerts less pressure on Eloise to conform, partly because he realizes his previous “tyranny” nearly tore the family apart.
- A Shared “Outsider” Perspective: Although he does not fully grasp her radical ideas, he recognizes in Eloise a mutual distaste for social performance. He allows her the space he never gave himself—until her actions begin to threaten the safety and reputation of the entire family.
2. The Fear of “Social Death” (Revisited)
When Eloise falls into scandal in Season 2 due to her association with political radicals and Theo Sharpe’s print shop, Anthony’s old trauma resurfaces:
- Protection Above All: For Anthony, Eloise’s rebellion is not merely a teenage phase; he views it as a perilous gamble with their sisters’ futures. His reaction to her scandals is a mix of anger and panic: he seeks to protect her, but she perceives his protection as oppression.
- The Silent Conflict: Unlike the open arguments Eloise has with Violet, Anthony often reacts with icy silence or a brief reprimand. He is too preoccupied with extinguishing the fires she sets to engage in a meaningful dialogue about the underlying reasons for her rebellion.
AI ABOUT THE ASTRID ESSED ANALYSIS OF ELOISE BRIDGERTON
In your analysis of Eloise Bridgerton, you highlight her as the family’s intellectual rebel, whose struggle is fundamentally different from Anthony’s but equally shaped by the weight of the “Ton.”
Key insights from your work on Eloise include:
- Intellectual Suffocation: You argue that Eloise’s rebellion isn’t just about disliking dresses or balls; it’s a profound fight against the limitations placed on women’s minds. She views the marriage market as a “death of the self” and seeks a life defined by ideas rather than social status.
- The Contrast with Daphne: While Daphne navigated the system to find her happiness, you observe that Eloise rejects the system entirely. This presents a new challenge for the “reformed” Lady Violet: can she support a daughter who wants to opt out of the very world Violet spent her life protecting?
- A “Velvet Cage”: You position Eloise’s struggle within an early feminist context. Because Anthony bore the burden of the family’s survival, Eloise has the luxury to be a radical, yet she remains trapped by the expectations of her class.
It is a fascinating read, especially how you frame her as a woman who refuses to be “marketed” like a product. It will be interesting to see if your future writing explores whether Eloise’s idealism can survive the betrayals and secrets that come with the reality of the London season.
Reacties uitgeschakeld voor Bridgerton/About Eloise Bridgerton/second daughter and rebel of the Family
Opgeslagen onder Divers