NOS Teletekst, benoem duidelijk de Israelische bezetting en de illegaliteit van de nederzettingen/Berichtgevinng dd 21 augustus/”Europa veroordeelt bouwplan Israel”

Image result for settlements/Images
ISRAELISCHE NEDERZETTINGEN/IN STRIJD MET HET INTERNATIONAAL
RECHT

NOS TELETEKST, BENOEM DUIDELIJK DE ISRAELISCHE BEZETTING EN DE ILLEGALITEIT VAN DE NEDERZETTINGEN/NAAR AANLEIDING VAN NOS BERICHTGEVING ”EUROPA VEROORDEELT BOUWPLAN ISRAEL”

AAN
NOS TELETEKST
Onderwerp:
Uw berichtgeving dd 21 augustus: ”Europa veroordeelt bouwplan Israel”

De tijd is daar
Om over allerlei te praten”

Een schoen, een schip, een kandelaar,

Of koningen ook liegen

En of de zee soms koken kan

En een biggetje kan vliegen.
Uit het Engels vertaald uit:

THE WALRUS AND THE CARPENTERLEWIS CARROLL: ALICE IN WONDERLAND
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Walrus_and_the_Carpenter

Geachte Redactie
[KRITIEK IN HET KORT
In onderstaande berichtgeving wordt noch de Israelische bezetting benoemd, noch het feit dat het hier om nederzettingen gaat, noch het internationaalrechtelijke karakter van die nederzettingen]
DE KRITIEK:
U bent nog niet van mij af/HAHA [herinner mijn eerdere afvuringen op u! [1]  , zoals u aan onderstaand commentaar zult zien.
In dat verband kon ik de verleiding niet weerstaan, mijn reactie op uw berichtgeving te starten met deze prachtige, maar bizarre passage uit de overgetelijke klassieker ”Alice in Wonderland” [2]
Waarom?
Omdat uw berichtgeving minstens even bizar is, zo niet bizarrer!
En dat is des te stuitender juist nu Israel in de bezette Westbank, waar uw berichtgeving over gaat, als een Dolle tekeer gaat en kennelijk soliciteert naar Wereldkampioen Oorlogsmisdaden [3]
UW BERICHTGEVING:
In uw door mij gewraakte berichtgeving vermeldt u dat Europa [bij monde van een aantal Europese landen en ook Canada] ”het openstellen van biedingen voor een bouwproject ten Oosten van Jeruzalem” [uw bewoordingen], veroordeelt
Als nieuwsbericht voeg ik onder noot 4 de verklaring van de Canadese regering toe
Zie voor uw berichtgeving onder P/S [daarboven het notenapparaat]
 
Nadat u terecht vermeld hebt  dat hiermee een Palestijnse Staat onmogelijk gemaakt wordt, schrijft u het volgende
Israel wil beginnen met de bouw van 1200 huizen, een derde van het totaal”
En dat is nou waar mijn zo langzamerhand FELLE kritiek zich op richt
Want opnieuw bagatelliseert u in uw berichtgeving zowel de Israelische bezetting en het verschijnsel nederzettingen in bezet gebied, terwijl ik u nog dit jaar een compliment heb gemaakt over uw juiste weergave van die nederzettingen [5], maar kennelijk hebt u nog niets geleerd OF u bent vervallen in uw oude Fouten.
Maar ik druk mij nog niet sterk genoeg uit, want u bagatelliseert niet zozeer, het is nog erger:
U NOEMT bezetting en nederzettingen niet eens!
WAT DEUGT ER NIET AAN UW BERICHTGEVING?
Niet alleen wordt door uw vage en onduidelijke formuleringen over de locatie in het begin van uw berichtgeving [het openstellen van biedingen voor een bouwproject ten Oosten van Jeruzalem] volstrekt niet duideijk waar een en ander zich afspeelt, als u dan uiteindelijk wel het woord ”Westoever” noemt maakt de cruciale fout daarbij niet te vermelden, dat het om door Israel bezet gebied gaat.
Vervolgens hanteert u weer het klassieke voorbeeld van onvolledige en tendentieuze berichtgeving, door te refereren aan de ”bouw van 1200 huizen” [uw bewoordingen] waardoor gedaan wordt alsof het hier over gewone bewoning gaat, wat NIET het geval is.
Wat vermeld had MOETEN worden was dat dat E1 Project gaat  om ”huizen”, die in bezet gebied gebouwd worden [6] en derhalve NEDERZETTINGEN zijn.
Dit schrijft Wikipedia over dat E1 Project
E1 (short for “East 1”; Hebrewמְבַשֶּׂרֶת אֲדֻמִּיםromanizedMevaseret Adumimlit.‘Herald of Adumim’), also called the E1 areaE1 zone or E1 corridor, is an area of the Israeli-occupied West Bank within the municipal boundary of the Israeli settlement[1] of Ma’ale Adumim.[7]
Waarbij nog ter verduidelijking, dat Ma’le Adumin een nederzetting is [8]
NEDERZETTINGEN, IN STRIJD MET HET INTERNATIONAAL RECHT
Iets wat u heel goed weet [9], maar ervoor koos om het niet in uw berichtgeving te vermelden:
Alle in bezet gebied door de Israelische Staat of particuliere Israelisch burgers gebouwde ”huizen”, de zogeheten nederzettingen [vanaf de grootste villa tot voor mijn part een stacaravan], zijn illegaal volgens het Internationaal Recht [10], volgens artikel 49, 4e Conventie van Geneve en artikel 55 van de Haagse Conventie uit 1907 [11]
Niet voor niets is dat nogmaals bevestigd in de bovengenoemde gezamenljke verklaring van een aantal Europese landen waaronder Nederland en ook Canada [12]
EPILOOG
Uit bovenstaande blijkt dus duidelijk hoe u in uw berichtgeving weer in de fout bent gegaan ondanks een aanvankelijke verbetering [13]
Daarom roep ik u dringend op om bij een volgende berichtgeving over het Midden Oostenconflict duidelijk te in verband met de West Bank, Gaza [14] en Oost-Jeruzalem te vermelden, dat hier sprake is van bezetting en dat de nederzettingen in strijd zijn met het Internationaal Recht en geen eufemismes meer te gebruiken als ”bouw van nieuwe huizen” als het om het bouwen van huizen op bezet Palestijns gebied gaat! Want dat zijn dus nederzettingen
Ik reken erop, dat u dit her harte neemt en ook toepast
 I’ll keep watching you!
Vriendelijke groeten
Astrid Essed
Amsterdam
NOTEN
 
NOTEN 1 T/M 3
 
NOOT 4
NOOT 5
NOOT 6
NOOT 7
NOOT 8
NOTEN 9 T/M 11
NOOT 12
NOTEN 13 EN 14
P/S
BERICHTGEVING TELETEKST DD 21 AUGUSTUS 2026

NOS TELETEKST

EUROPA VEROORDEELT BOUWPLAN ISRAEL
Duitsland, Frankrijk, Italie, het VK, Nederland en ook Canada hebben Israel veroordeeld voor het openstellen van biedingen voor een bouwproject ten Oosten van Jeruzalem.
Dit zogeheten E1 Project maakt een toekomstige Staat voor de Palestijnen vrijwel onmogelijk.
Israel wil beginnen met de bouw van 1200 huizen, een derde van het totaal.
Daarmee zou de Westoever de facto in tweeen worden gesneden.
Het project werd al in de jaren 90 gelanceerd  maar na kritiek op de lange baan geschoven.
Aanjager van  het plan is minister van Financien Smotrich, een extremist die rond goedkeuring zei dat E1 het idee van een Palestijnse Staat ”begraaft”

EINDE TELETEKSTBERICHT

ORIGINEEL TELETEKST BERICHT
Europa veroordeelt bouwplan Israël  

 Duitsland,Frankrijk,Italië,het VK,   
 Nederland en ook Canada hebben Israël  
 veroordeeld voor het openstellen van   
 biedingen voor een bouwproject ten     
 oosten van Jeruzalem.Dit zogeheten E1- 
 project maakt een toekomstige staat    
 voor de Palestijnen vrijwel onmogelijk.
                                        
 Israël wil beginnen met de bouw van    
 1200 huizen,een derde van het totaal.  
 Daarmee zou de Westoever de facto in   
 tweeën worden gesneden.Het project werd
 al in de jaren 90 gelanceerd maar na   
 kritiek op de lange baan geschoven.    
                                        
 Aanjager van het plan is minister van  
 Financiën Smotrich,een extremist die   
 rond de goedkeuring zei dat E1 het idee
 van een Palestijnse staat "begraaft".

Reacties uitgeschakeld voor NOS Teletekst, benoem duidelijk de Israelische bezetting en de illegaliteit van de nederzettingen/Berichtgevinng dd 21 augustus/”Europa veroordeelt bouwplan Israel”

Opgeslagen onder Divers

Mail Astrid Essed aan NOS Teletekst/Uw berichtgeving dd 21 augustus/”Europa veroordeelt bouwplan Israel”

Image result for settlements/Images
ISRAELISCHE NEDERZETTINGEN/IN STRIJD MET HET INTERNATIONAAL
RECHT
MAIL ASTRID ESSED AAN NOS TELETEKST
UW BERICHTGEVING DD 21 AUGUSTUS\; ”EUROPA VEROORDEELT BOUWPLAN ISRAEL”

Astrid Essed

11:45 (3 minuten geleden)

 

AAN
NOS TELETEKST
Onderwerp:
Uw berichtgeving dd 21 augustus: ”Europa veroordeelt bouwplan Israel”

De tijd is daar
Om over allerlei te praten”

Een schoen, een schip, een kandelaar,

Of koningen ook liegen

En of de zee soms koken kan

En een biggetje kan vliegen.
Uit het Engels vertaald uit:

THE WALRUS AND THE CARPENTERLEWIS CARROLL: ALICE IN WONDERLAND
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Walrus_and_the_Carpenter

Geachte Redactie
[KRITIEK IN HET KORT
In onderstaande berichtgeving wordt noch de Israelische bezetting benoemd, noch het feit dat het hier om nederzettingen gaat, noch het internationaalrechtelijke karakter van die nederzettingen]
DE KRITIEK:
U bent nog niet van mij af/HAHA [herinner mijn eerdere afvuringen op u! [1]  , zoals u aan onderstaand commentaar zult zien.
In dat verband kon ik de verleiding niet weerstaan, mijn reactie op uw berichtgeving te starten met deze prachtige, maar bizarre passage uit de overgetelijke klassieker ”Alice in Wonderland” [2]
Waarom?
Omdat uw berichtgeving minstens even bizar is, zo niet bizarrer!
En dat is des te stuitender juist nu Israel in de bezette Westbank, waar uw berichtgeving over gaat, als een Dolle tekeer gaat en kennelijk soliciteert naar Wereldkampioen Oorlogsmisdaden [3]
UW BERICHTGEVING:
In uw door mij gewraakte berichtgeving vermeldt u dat Europa [bij monde van een aantal Europese landen en ook Canada] ”het openstellen van biedingen voor een bouwproject ten Oosten van Jeruzalem” [uw bewoordingen], veroordeelt
Als nieuwsbericht voeg ik onder noot 4 de verklaring van de Canadese regering toe
Zie voor uw berichtgeving onder P/S [daarboven het notenapparaat]
 
Nadat u terecht vermeld hebt  dat hiermee een Palestijnse Staat onmogelijk gemaakt wordt, schrijft u het volgende
Israel wil beginnen met de bouw van 1200 huizen, een derde van het totaal”
En dat is nou waar mijn zo langzamerhand FELLE kritiek zich op richt
Want opnieuw bagatelliseert u in uw berichtgeving zowel de Israelische bezetting en het verschijnsel nederzettingen in bezet gebied, terwijl ik u nog dit jaar een compliment heb gemaakt over uw juiste weergave van die nederzettingen [5], maar kennelijk hebt u nog niets geleerd OF u bent vervallen in uw oude Fouten.
Maar ik druk mij nog niet sterk genoeg uit, want u bagatelliseert niet zozeer, het is nog erger:
U NOEMT bezetting en nederzettingen niet eens!
WAT DEUGT ER NIET AAN UW BERICHTGEVING?
Niet alleen wordt door uw vage en onduidelijke formuleringen over de locatie in het begin van uw berichtgeving [het openstellen van biedingen voor een bouwproject ten Oosten van Jeruzalem] volstrekt niet duideijk waar een en ander zich afspeelt, als u dan uiteindelijk wel het woord ”Westoever” noemt maakt de cruciale fout daarbij niet te vermelden, dat het om door Israel bezet gebied gaat.
Vervolgens hanteert u weer het klassieke voorbeeld van onvolledige en tendentieuze berichtgeving, door te refereren aan de ”bouw van 1200 huizen” [uw bewoordingen] waardoor gedaan wordt alsof het hier over gewone bewoning gaat, wat NIET het geval is.
Wat vermeld had MOETEN worden was dat dat E1 Project gaat  om ”huizen”, die in bezet gebied gebouwd worden [6] en derhalve NEDERZETTINGEN zijn.
Dit schrijft Wikipedia over dat E1 Project
E1 (short for “East 1”; Hebrewמְבַשֶּׂרֶת אֲדֻמִּיםromanizedMevaseret Adumimlit.‘Herald of Adumim’), also called the E1 areaE1 zone or E1 corridor, is an area of the Israeli-occupied West Bank within the municipal boundary of the Israeli settlement[1] of Ma’ale Adumim.[7]
Waarbij nog ter verduidelijking, dat Ma’le Adumin een nederzetting is [8]
NEDERZETTINGEN, IN STRIJD MET HET INTERNATIONAAL RECHT
Iets wat u heel goed weet [9], maar ervoor koos om het niet in uw berichtgeving te vermelden:
Alle in bezet gebied door de Israelische Staat of particuliere Israelisch burgers gebouwde ”huizen”, de zogeheten nederzettingen [vanaf de grootste villa tot voor mijn part een stacaravan], zijn illegaal volgens het Internationaal Recht [10], volgens artikel 49, 4e Conventie van Geneve en artikel 55 van de Haagse Conventie uit 1907 [11]
Niet voor niets is dat nogmaals bevestigd in de bovengenoemde gezamenljke verklaring van een aantal Europese landen waaronder Nederland en ook Canada [12]
EPILOOG
Uit bovenstaande blijkt dus duidelijk hoe u in uw berichtgeving weer in de fout bent gegaan ondanks een aanvankelijke verbetering [13]
Daarom roep ik u dringend op om bij een volgende berichtgeving over het Midden Oostenconflict duidelijk te in verband met de West Bank, Gaza [14] en Oost-Jeruzalem te vermelden, dat hier sprake is van bezetting en dat de nederzettingen in strijd zijn met het Internationaal Recht en geen eufemismes meer te gebruiken als ”bouw van nieuwe huizen” als het om het bouwen van huizen op bezet Palestijns gebied gaat! Want dat zijn dus nederzettingen
Ik reken erop, dat u dit her harte neemt en ook toepast
 I’ll keep watching you!
Vriendelijke groeten
Astrid Essed
Amsterdam
NOTEN
 
NOTEN 1 T/M 3
 
NOOT 4
NOOT 5
NOOT 6
NOOT 7
NOOT 8
NOTEN 9 T/M 11
NOOT 12
NOTEN 13 EN 14
P/S
BERICHTGEVING TELETEKST DD 21 AUGUSTUS 2026

NOS TELETEKST

EUROPA VEROORDEELT BOUWPLAN ISRAEL
Duitsland, Frankrijk, Italie, het VK, Nederland en ook Canada hebben Israel veroordeeld voor het openstellen van biedingen voor een bouwproject ten Oosten van Jeruzalem.
Dit zogeheten E1 Project maakt een toekomstige Staat voor de Palestijnen vrijwel onmogelijk.
Israel wil beginnen met de bouw van 1200 huizen, een derde van het totaal.
Daarmee zou de Westoever de facto in tweeen worden gesneden.
Het project werd al in de jaren 90 gelanceerd  maar na kritiek op de lange baan geschoven.
Aanjager van  het plan is minister van Financien Smotrich, een extremist die rond goedkeuring zei dat E1 het idee van een Palestijnse Staat ”begraaft”

EINDE TELETEKSTBERICHT

ORIGINEEL TELETEKST BERICHT
Europa veroordeelt bouwplan Israël  

 Duitsland,Frankrijk,Italië,het VK,   
 Nederland en ook Canada hebben Israël  
 veroordeeld voor het openstellen van   
 biedingen voor een bouwproject ten     
 oosten van Jeruzalem.Dit zogeheten E1- 
 project maakt een toekomstige staat    
 voor de Palestijnen vrijwel onmogelijk.
                                        
 Israël wil beginnen met de bouw van    
 1200 huizen,een derde van het totaal.  
 Daarmee zou de Westoever de facto in   
 tweeën worden gesneden.Het project werd
 al in de jaren 90 gelanceerd maar na   
 kritiek op de lange baan geschoven.    
                                        
 Aanjager van het plan is minister van  
 Financiën Smotrich,een extremist die   
 rond de goedkeuring zei dat E1 het idee
 van een Palestijnse staat "begraaft".

Reacties uitgeschakeld voor Mail Astrid Essed aan NOS Teletekst/Uw berichtgeving dd 21 augustus/”Europa veroordeelt bouwplan Israel”

Opgeslagen onder Divers

NOTEN 1 T/M 3/WEER NOS TELETEKST

[1]
[2]

WIKIPEDIA

ALICE’S ADVENTURES IN WONDERLAND

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alice%27s_Adventures_in_Wonderland

[3]

HUMAN RIGHTS WATCH

WEST-BANK: ISRAEL BACKED SETTLER VIOLENCE DRIVES DISPLACEMENT

Record Year for Settler Attacks on Palestinians

20 AUGUST 2026

https://www.hrw.org/news/2026/08/20/west-bank-israel-backed-settler-violence-drives-displacement

  • Escalating Israeli settler attacks on Palestinians in the West Bank have fully or partially displaced 107 communities since January 2023 alongside unprecedented settlement expansion.
  • Settlers responsible for attacks operate with the financial, material, and legal backing of the Israeli state. Attacks by armed settlers often occur alongside Israeli army units or with soldiers standing by.
  • Other countries should impose targeted sanctions on those implicated in ongoing grave abuses, suspend arms transfers to Israel, ban trade with illegal settlements, and consider suspending preferential trade agreements with Israel.

(Beirut) – Attacks by settlers in the occupied West Bank are increasingly driving the forced displacement of Palestinian communities, with dozens at risk of erasure, Human Rights Watch said today. Israeli authorities are arming, funding, and granting impunity to the violent settlers responsible for these escalating deadly abuses.

Settler violence spiked in March and April 2026, with killings, including of children, as well as assaults, sexual violence, physical and mental abuse, arbitrary detention, arson, property destruction, and theft. The attacks occurred during the United States and Israel’s war with Iran, but the rising trend has been clear since the current government took office in December 2022.

“The Israeli government and the settlers share the same goal of maximum land and minimum Palestinians, with the authorities not only failing to stop settler violence, but actively enabling it,” said Sarah Sanbar, acting Israel and Palestine researcher at Human Rights Watch. “Settlers shoot, attack, and expel Palestinians from their land, and the state provides the weapons, the legal cover, and the budget to do it.”

In April and May, Human Rights Watch investigated settler attacks in seven Palestinian West Bank communities: Al-Mughayyir, Mikhmas, and Taybeh, in Ramallah governorate; Jalud and Qaryut, in Nablus governorate; and Khirbet Humsa and Muarrajat East, in the Jordan Valley. Armed settlers, at times acting alongside Israeli army units or with soldiers standing by yet failing to intervene, attacked Palestinian residents and property, contributing to a pattern of forced displacement.

Human Rights Watch spoke to 20 witnesses and reviewed videos that witnesses filmed and CCTV footage of multiple incidents. The Israeli military has not replied to questions from Human Rights Watch about the attacks.

People interviewed reported organized attacks targeting Palestinians’ livelihoods and food security by restricting access to grazing land and water, stealing or killing livestock, and destroying or burning agricultural fields and crops. As a result, many either sold their livestock, often at a loss, or had to bear the cost of grain to feed them at home.

Human Rights Watch found that attacks increasingly target the area of the West Bank under joint Israeli-Palestinian Authority security control, known as “Area B” under the 1995 Oslo II Accords.

The attacks and lack of state protection have created a coercive environment that leaves many Palestinians saying they have no choice but to leave their homes, Human Rights Watch said.

“I have known war in this region for all my life, but never like this,” said Um Muhammad Muammar, 72, a resident of Qaryut whose two sons were killed by settlers. “My sons’ children are now fatherless; their wives are now widows. What more can we say?”

According to the United Nations Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs (OCHA), more Palestinians were forcibly displaced by settler attacks, demolitions, and evictions in the first four months of this year than the whole of 2025. OCHA has documented an average of 6.6 settler attacks per day that resulted in casualties, property damage, or both, higher than any year on its record.

While the Israeli military remains responsible for the majority of killings in the West Bank, fatalities attributed to settlers have risen sharply. OCHA recorded at least 15 Palestinians, including two children, killed by settlers as of July 24, putting 2026 on track to surpass OCHA’s previous record of 16 such killings set in 2023.

It found that settler violence has completely or partially displaced 107 communities comprising 5,900 Palestinians since January 2023. The Israeli military expelled another 32,000 Palestinian refugees from their West Bank homes in January 2025, essentially emptying the Jenin, Tulkarem, and Nur Shams camps. The E1 settlement project east of Jerusalem, for which the government opened a new construction tender on August 18, 2026, would forcibly displace over 18 more Bedouin communities in the area.

Settlers responsible for displacing Palestinians operate with the financialmaterial, and legal backing of the Israeli state. In March, the Times of Israel reported that the government had approved about 50 million shekels (about US$16 million) for illegal settlement outposts, funding that has been used for all-terrain vehicles, night-vision goggles, and drones that settlers use to harass Palestinian communities. According to Amnesty International, the Ministry of Settlement and National Missions’ budget has increased 122 percent under the current government.

Israeli authorities fail to prosecute settlers for violence against Palestinians, effectively granting them impunity. At the end of 2025, Yesh Din, an Israeli human rights organization, reported that of the hundreds of cases it had documented since 2005, only three percent had resulted in convictions. In November 2025, the Israeli news outlet N12 News reported a 70 percent drop in police cases against settlers for attacking Palestinians since Itamar Ben-Gvir became National Security Minister in 2022, despite the unprecedented rise in such attacks since then. Just one Israeli has been charged for killing a Palestinian in the West Bank since 2019, according to the Guardian.

The line between settlers and state security forces is deliberately blurred, making it difficult to distinguish settlers from soldiers. Following the October 7, 2023 attacks on southern Israel by Palestinian armed groups, the Israeli military called up 5,500 West Bank settlers who are army reservists and assigned them to West Bank “regional defense battalions.” These settler-soldier units act with wide autonomy, advancing settler objectives while holding full military authority and committing abuses against Palestinians with impunity.

At the same time, the National Security Ministry formed civilian “rapid response squads” in settlements and gave them special policing powers, uniforms, and weapons. Ben-Gvir also loosened licensing requirements for firearms, in some cases personally overseeing the distribution of rifles to settlers.

Settler violence and the displacement it causes are both a manifestation of and a vehicle for Israel’s expanding illegal settlement enterprise. In July 2026, Israeli Defense Minister Israel Katz told Channel 7 News that his government had approved the establishment of 104 new settlements since taking office, nearly doubling the total number from 127 to 231. During the war with Iran, the Israeli cabinet secretly approved what i24 News stated was the largest single settlement expansion in the history of the settlement enterprise, comprising 34 settlements, 10 of which were preexisting outposts that were retroactively “legalized” under Israeli law.

These outposts, which often serve as launching pads for attacks, are illegal under international humanitarian law. Lacking formal permits from the Israeli government, they are also considered illegal under domestic law, though the Israeli government frequently retroactively “legalizes” them. Their “legalization” under domestic law has no bearing on their continued illegality under international humanitarian law.

Under the current Israeli government, settlers have established 248 new outposts in the West Bank, 65 in 2026 alone as of August 1, according to Israeli group PeaceNow. Often serving as precursors to larger settlements, these outposts—and their retroactive “legalization” under domestic law—push the frontier of settlement expansion and the appropriation of Palestinian land. Katz told Channel 7 News that his government had “legalized” about 160 outposts during its tenure.

Israeli organizations Kerem Navot and PeaceNow reported in July that these outposts currently effectively control more than 1 million dunams (100,000 hectares) of land—approximately 18 percent of the West Bank—four times what they controlled before the current government took office.

Article 49 of the Fourth Geneva Convention prohibits an occupying power from forcibly transferring, displacing, or deporting the civilian population of an occupied territory in whole or in part. The only exception is temporary evacuation of an area if necessary for the security of the population or imperative military reasons. The International Committee of the Red Cross’s 2025 Commentary on the Fourth Geneva Convention notes that forcible transfers can be indirect when a party does not expressly order or is not directly involved in the deportation, “but commits violations of international humanitarian law or human rights law with the effect to cause the population to leave.” Article 49 also prohibits the occupying power from transferring its own civilian population into the territory it occupies.

The evidence shows that Israel has failed to uphold its obligations to protect against, prevent, investigate, and prosecute acts of violence against the occupied population and has further enabled this violence by continuing to provide material support for settler groups responsible for abuses against Palestinians, Human Rights Watch said. The reallocation of displaced Palestinians’ land for illegal settlements indicates that this displacement is not temporary and cannot be considered permissible evacuations under the Fourth Geneva Convention.

Other countries should act to prevent further atrocities across the Occupied Palestinian Territory, including by imposing targeted sanctions on those implicated in ongoing grave abuses, suspending arms transfers to Israel, banning trade with illegal settlements, considering suspending preferential trade agreements with Israel, and supporting the International Criminal Court and its ongoing investigations, including by executing its arrest warrants.

“The impunity Israeli authorities accord settlers stems directly from the free pass Israel’s allies and donors have granted it,” Sanbar said. “Accountability starts with the settlers committing crimes but doesn’t end there. Israel and the governments that give it a blank check share responsibility and should be held to account.”

In July 2024, the International Court of Justice found that Israel’s occupation of Palestinian territory is unlawful and that Israel is in breach of the prohibition of racial segregation and apartheid. The court found that Israel has systematically failed to prevent or punish settler attacks on Palestinians’ life and bodily integrity, concluding that settler violence, alongside land confiscation and resource deprivation, has contributed to the creation of a coercive environment.

The court further found that Israel’s policies and practices often leave little choice to Palestinians living in Area C—under Israeli security and civil administration—but to leave their area of residence, and that Israel’s practices are contrary to the prohibition of forcible transfer. The court found Israel has an obligation to evacuate all settlers in the West Bank including East Jerusalem, allow displaced Palestinians to return to their homes, and provide them with reparations.

Human Rights Watch has previously found that Israeli authorities intentionally caused the massive, deliberate, and long-term forced displacement of Palestinian civilians in both Gaza and the West Bank, amounting to ethnic cleansing, war crimes, and crimes against humanity. In both cases, senior Israeli officials have declared their aim to expel and keep Palestinians out of parts of Gaza and the West Bank.

Human Rights Watch has previously called for forced displacement and prevention of the right to return committed by Israeli authorities in Gaza to be investigated as a crime against humanity. Human Rights Watch has called for investigating the military officials Maj. Gen. Avi Bluth, Lt. Gen. Herzi Halevi, Lt. Gen. Eyal Zamir, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, Defense Minister Israel Katz, and Defense Minister Bezalel Smotrich for individual criminal responsibility, including as a matter of command responsibility, for war crimes and crimes against humanity committed in the context of the forced displacement of the Palestinian population in the West Bank.

Attacks on Palestinian Communities

Khirbet Humsa

On March 13 at 1 a.m., Suhaib Abu al-Kebash, a 29-year-old shepherd, said that he, his family, and two international activists woke to loud voices and dogs barking. He left his tent and saw what he estimated to be 80 to 100 masked settlers descending on their tents from multiple sides:

They caught me and handcuffed me with [plastic zip ties] and also bound my legs. They took down my trousers and put my genitals in [a zip tie], and they put me on the floor, between 8 and 10 of [the attackers]. They broke the lights and they started to beat me with their fists in my face. They hit my father and my brother with sticks. My brother was stabbed in the hand. He was beaten everywhere.

They put us all in one tent; all of us were handcuffed [zip tied], even the children. One threw my daughter three meters. They took soil and water and threw it on us. They called us names, cursed us, and threatened us. They said: “If you stay here, we will kidnap your wife and daughters, we will beat them, we’ll do anything. If you are still here tomorrow, we will come back and burn you and burn your tents.”

An April report by the West Bank Protection Consortium found that “Israeli settlers are subjecting Palestinians to sexualised violence and other forms of gender-based abuse within a broader coercive environment that forces displacement across the West Bank.”

“We are scared any time a car comes to our area,” said Muhammad Abu al-Kebash, Suhaib’s brother and also a victim of the attack. “The children are traumatized.”

After the attack, Muhammad called the Israeli police, army, and an ambulance. He said the soldiers and police arrived two hours later and gave them first aid, but authorities stopped two Palestinian Red Crescent ambulances on Allon Road at the entrance to the Ro’i settlement, three kilometers away. Only one of the two ambulances was permitted to reach Khirbet Humsa after waiting for two hours.

Israeli authorities detained seven settlers involved in the attack that night, but they have been released until their scheduled hearing date, an Israeli activist with knowledge of the case said.

Though many neighboring herder communities have fled because of settler attacks, the Abu al-Kebash family is committed to remaining in Khirbet Humsa. “We need money or support, but whether or not we get it, we will stay here,” said Muhammad. “The only place we will go from here is the grave.”

According to Israeli human rights organization B’Tselem, between October 7, 2023, and December 31, 2025, settler violence led to the total or partial displacement of at least nine communities in the northern Jordan Valley, affecting at least 435 people, including 207 children.

Muarrajat East

Sustained attacks and harassment from Israeli settlers forced the residents of Muarrajat East, a Bedouin herding community northwest of Jericho in the Jordan Valley, to flee on the evening of July 4, 2025. The entire community of 50 families, refugees from the Naqab (Negev) in 1948, remain displaced and unable to return. Muarrajat East is in Area C, which under the Oslo II Accords is under civil and security control of Israeli authorities and comprises 60 percent of the West Bank’s territory.

Alia Mleihat, 28, a resident of the community and university student studying security and peace, said that the attacks began in 2021, when an illegal settler outpost was established on a hilltop nearby. “The settlers started to ban people from circulating on the land, and they began attacking people with the protection of the police and army,” she said. “They used to steal our sheep while the police and army watched.”

After October 2023, she said, attacks against the community intensified. Settlers, emboldened by state policies and army protection, engaged in a pattern of attacks documented in other communities: destroying property, demolishing wells and solar panels, stealing livestock and feed, and assaulting and threatening residents.

“The settlers are the ones who give orders to the army, not the other way around,” she said. “When the settlers attacked our community, the police and soldiers would close the gates around the village so no one could get out or get in to help us. We felt like we were in prison.”

On July 3, 2025, settlers established an outpost in the village center, 100 meters from the community’s school: “Settlers brought their animals and occupied the school. They banned students from going to school and denied the community access to their water resources. One family was forced to leave their house, and the settlers took it over.”

“That night, the settlers came between our houses driving [utility vehicles] and carrying weapons,” she said. “They forced [us] the people of the community to leave the land of our village in the middle of the night. It was like another Nakba [“catastrophe,” the term used to describe the mass displacement of Palestinians in 1948]. It was an atmosphere of war.”

By July 4, 2025, the entire community had fled Muarrajat East.

In February 2026, settlers demolished the remaining houses in the village following a February 4 Israeli court order for the Israeli military, the Civil Administration, and the police to enable the community’s safe return. “They destroyed all the houses to make sure we could never come back,” Mleihat said.

Forcible transfers can also be effected through acts deliberately aimed at preventing or impeding the return of the population.

Although the community moved to al-Awsaj, in Area A near Jericho, where the Palestinian Authority holds security and civil authority, attacks and harassment from Israeli settlers continue. “We came here because it’s Area A, and we thought it would be safe for us, but we were wrong,” Mleihat said. On May 3, the day before Human Rights Watch visited al-Awsaj, settlers drove through the community, harassing residents and threatening to steal livestock. “They will continue to attack us until they make us flee into Jordan.”

A June 2026 report by Amnesty International found that Israeli authorities have pursued a policy of ethnic cleansing in Area C of the occupied West Bank, and that Israel’s forcible displacement of Palestinian Bedouin and herding communities amounts to war crimes and crimes against humanity under international law.

Al-Mughayyir

Al-Mughayyir, a village northeast of Ramallah, has been a focal point of increasing settler violence in recent years. In 2025 alone, OCHA recorded at least 43 settler attacks against Palestinians in the village that caused casualties or property damage, equaling the number of such incidents in the preceding two years combined. Since 2023, settlers or soldiers have killed three boys and four men in al-Mughayyir, according to OCHA. Two of these people were killed in a settler attack on a school on April 21, 2026: Jihad Abu Naim, 32, and his nephew, Aws Hamdi Naasan, 14. Human Rights Watch interviewed their family members and other witnesses 11 days later and verified 9 videos from the incident.

Waheed Abu Naim, Jihad’s brother and a teacher at the school, said that shooting erupted near the boys’ school on the western edge of the village at around 12:15 p.m. on April 21. He said that two settlers wearing incomplete military uniforms and four soldiers approached the school premises. All six were armed.

He told the soldiers that children were studying in the school. One soldier told him, in Arabic, to go home. Another pointed his gun at Waheed and told him to get inside the school: “It was then that I understood that they are here to commit a crime.” He went back into the school and closed the gate, and the shooting started.

According to witness statements and video evidence verified by Human Rights Watch, a settler opened fire on the school from the hillside overlooking it. One video shows the moment the settler shot Aws in the head as he ran down the hill away from the shooter, on the outer side of the school wall. Researchers went to the site and saw multiple bullet holes in the school wall.

Marzouq Abu Naim, Jihad’s father, said that the school director issued a plea for help on his social media account after the shooting started. Jihad left his work at a construction site and went to the school to respond to the plea. According to video evidence and witness statements, he was shot in the right side of his chest at the top of the hill. Residents transported him to a hospital in the neighboring town of Khirbet Abu Falah, where he was pronounced dead. Settlers shot and injured two other people during the attack: a man in his thirties in the stomach and a man in his sixties in the leg, witnesses said.

Human Rights Watch wrote to the Israeli military requesting information on any investigations opened into the incident but received no response.

Escalating settler attacks in al-Mughayyir have taken a particularly heavy toll on Aws and Jihad’s family. Settlers killed Aws’ father, Hamdi, on January 26, 2019. Family members said that Israeli soldiers shot dead Aws’ best friend, Mohammed Naasan, 14, in the village in January 2026.

Rehab Naasan, Aws’ paternal grandmother, said: “Aws said to me: ‘If something happens to me, bury me next to my friend.’ I told him: ‘Please don’t speak like this. We could not bear anything happening to you; we already lost your father.’ But he insisted. The day after, he went to school and he didn’t come back.”

Residents of al-Mughayyir said nine settlement outposts encircle the village, seven of them established since 2023, including one in Area B. Residents said the establishment of these outposts coincided with the significant increase in settler attacks against the village.

The largest outpost, Adei Ad, was “legalized” by the Israeli government as a settlement in May 2025 and serves as a hub for the others around al-Mughayyir. The Israeli government “legalized” another nearby outpost, Malachei HaShalom, on June 11, 2025, and designated 750 dunams (75 hectares) of land around it as state land.

The Israeli military has closed all but one road leading into and out of the village. A village council member said that settlers have stolen or prevented access to 98 percent of al-Mughayyir’s land, including all the village’s grazing lands and olive groves, with severe impacts on people’s livelihoods.

In August 2025, the head of the Israeli military’s Central Command signed an order for the uprooting of olive trees on 300 dunams (30 hectares) of al-Mughayyir’s land, ostensibly for security reasons after a Palestinian reportedly shot and wounded a settler who had trespassed on the village’s land. According to Kerem Navot, settlers from the Shiloh area carried out clearing operations on about 620 dunams (62 hectares), more than twice the area covered by the order. After the uprooting, settlers took over parts of the land.

Al-Mughayyir also hosts around a dozen families first displaced from Ein Samia to al-Khalayil, on the outskirts of al-Mughayyir in Area B, in May 2023 following sustained settler attacks. In February 2026, they were displaced again from al-Khalayil to al-Mughayyir by the Israeli military, who cited an order declaring the area a “closed military zone.” According to +972 Magazine, less than a month later, settlers erected an outpost on the site from which the families were displaced.

“They do these attacks because they see us as an obstacle to their aims, so they want us either to leave or die so they can take our lands,” a resident said. “But we know our history. We would rather die in front of military vehicles than leave our land.”

Qaryut

Qaryut, a Palestinian village between Ramallah and Nablus, has faced repeated attacks by Israeli settlers. “I have known war in this region for all my life, but never like this,” said Um Muhammad Muammar, 72. “My sons’ children are now fatherless; their wives are now widows. What more can we say?”

Around noon on March 2, 2026, settlers attacked Um Muhammad’s family house. She said that settlers shot three of her sons: Jamil, 46, Fahim, 48, and Muhammad Muammar, 52. The eldest two brothers were killed, while Jamil survived but walks with crutches from the bullet wound in his leg.

Jamil said that on the morning of the attack, he and his brothers went to see the source of a noise on the land behind their house and saw two settlers operating an excavator. He said that upon seeing them, one of the settlers fired shots in the air, and the brothers did not approach them.

Shortly afterward, he said, two settlers, one in uniform, approached the brothers who were watching the excavator from behind their house. “[The settler in uniform] tried to arrest one of us, without any question or reason to arrest us,” he said. “He started to threaten us, saying ‘you will see what I will do.’ […] He started to shoot in the air. […] We didn’t speak or argue, we went back home and sat under this olive tree.”

About 15 minutes later, a group of 30 to 40 settlers, including the settler in uniform who attempted to arrest them earlier, approached the house. He said two of them were carrying M16s, and three or four others had pistols: “The settlers started to throw stones against the house and broke the windows, and others shot the ground around us. Those who had guns started shooting, those without threw stones.”

He said that the uniformed settler, kneeling in a sniping position, shot Muhammad in the head and Fahim in his stomach. Jamil and some neighbors who came to help eventually managed to reach the brothers under continued gunfire. He said that two other neighbors who came to help were also shot and injured, one in the hand and one in the chest.

“We put them in our private cars and sent them to the medical center,” he said. “I stayed and went back to the house to protect it and the children and wives.” He said he was shot by the same sniper who killed his brothers when he approached his house.

He said that Muhammad was pronounced dead at the hospital, while Fahim succumbed to his injuries at the Qabalan medical center. Bashar al-Qaryuti, a first responder and activist based in Qaryut, said that during the attack, the Israeli military closed the road to the area, obstructing the ambulance and preventing him and other neighbors from reaching the family quickly.

“[Fahim] was injured, but they didn’t allow the ambulance to reach him on time,” his mother said. “Maybe he would still be alive if they had. [Fahim] was still conscious, his son was around him, he was even laughing.”

Al-Qaryuti said that the deliberate disruption of medical transport is a common occurrence in Qaryut, and that Israeli settlers have attacked his ambulance and team on at least five occasions. In April 2024, a settler shot and killed his ambulance driver, Mohammed Awad Allah Musa, as he and his team were evacuating injured Palestinians from an ongoing attack in nearby al-Sawiya, al-Qaryuti said.

He meticulously documented the incident, gathering evidence including photos, videos, and the bullet that killed Musa, which he turned over to the police and the army. Despite his efforts, to his knowledge, there was no investigation into the case.

“It is impossible to reach justice through the Israeli legal system,” he said. “I am ready to provide any court with all information, with pictures, with evidence, with documents, to testify in front of them. There is no accountability against settlers, and this is why they increase their attacks against Palestinians.”

Instead, sometimes soldiers and police intervene to support the settlers. “The military supports them fully,” he said. “Some of the soldiers are settlers themselves.”

statement issued by the Israeli military spokesperson following the March 2, 2026 incident said: “IDF forces rushed to the area of the village of Qaryut, which is under the Samaria Regional Brigade, following a report of altercations between Israeli civilians and Palestinians that included stone throwing. Later, a report was received of two Palestinians who were killed as a result of shooting and several Palestinians who were wounded. Upon receipt of the reports, a command field inquiry was immediately launched at all levels and found that the shooter was an active IDF reservist. After the inquiry, he was stripped of his weapon. A criminal investigation has been opened following the incident.”

Settlers or soldiers have killed three Palestinians in Qaryut since October 2023. In addition to these cases, B’Tselem reported that soldiers escorting settlers shot and killed Bana Labum, 13, firing into her bedroom window on September 6, 2024.

Qaryut has also lost significant amounts of agricultural land, particularly since October 2023, and is surrounded by seven outposts, residents said. Al-Qaryuti said that of the 22,000 dunams (2,200 hectares) of the village’s land, only 360 dunams (36 hectares), all in Area B and comprising the built-up sections of the village, remain accessible to residents of Qaryut.

“Before it was easier,” Um Muhammad said. “They have always been stealing and occupying the land, but it was never like this. Ever since [the settlers] came, they started to suffocate us bit by bit.”

END

Reacties uitgeschakeld voor NOTEN 1 T/M 3/WEER NOS TELETEKST

Opgeslagen onder Divers

NOOT 4/WEER NOS TELETEKST

[4]
JOINT STATEMENT ON ISRAELI GOVERNMENT’S DECISION TO PUBLIC CONSTRUCTION TENDERS FOR THE E1 SETTLEMENT PROJECT
20 AUGUST 2026

Statement by the leaders of Canada, France, Germany, Italy, Netherlands, Norway, and the United Kingdom on the Israeli Government’s decision to publish construction tenders for the E1 settlement project.

“The Israeli Government’s decision to publish construction tenders for the E1 settlement project is unacceptable. The international community has long opposed this settlement expansion, and has voiced their grave concerns privately and publicly. The E1 settlement will undermine the prospect of the two-state solution by driving a wedge through the West Bank and harming the territorial contiguity of the Palestinian Territories.

International law is clear that Israeli settlements in the West Bank are illegal. This is the position of the international community reaffirmed by the United Nations Security Council.

At a time of grave instability in the West Bank with unprecedented levels of violence by settlers against civilians, and serious restrictions on the Palestinian economy, this decision is even more concerning.

We urge the Government of Israel to retract these plans immediately and end its expansion of settlements in the West Bank. Not only will they take us further from peace, but they further undermine Israel’s international standing.

Businesses should not consider bidding for construction tenders. They should be aware of legal and reputational consequences including the risk of involving themselves in serious breaches of international law.

We reiterate our commitment to a comprehensive, just and lasting peace based on the two-state solution. We will continue to act in its interest.

Reacties uitgeschakeld voor NOOT 4/WEER NOS TELETEKST

Opgeslagen onder Divers

NOOT 5/WEER NOS TELETEKST

[5]
ZIE OOK MAIL ASTRID ESSED AAN NOS TELETEKSTREDACTIE

Uw berichtgeving dd 10 april 2026: ”Israel keurt 34 nederzettingen goed”

Inbox
 
AAN

NOS Teletekst
Onderwerp:
Uw berichtgeving dd 10 april 2026: ”Israel keurt 34 nederzettingen goed”

De walrus sprak:

De tijd is daar
Om over allerlei te praten”

Een schoen, een schip, een kandelaar,

Of koningen ook liegen

En of de zee soms koken kan

En een biggetje kan vliegen.
Uit het Engels vertaald uit:

THE WALRUS AND THE CARPENTERLEWIS CARROLL: ALICE IN WONDERLAND
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Walrus_and_the_Carpenter

”IN HET KORT:

U geeft de exacte formulering van de illegaliteit vn de nederzettingen niet aan, u

geeft niet aan wat ”Yetnews” is  en in welke context Yesh Din spreekt over

”etnische zuiveringen”

Geachte Redactie,

Met deze onvergetelijke klassieker uit Alice in Wonderland [1] over de bizarheid van het leven start ik mijn

mail, die zowel complimenten als kritiek aan uw adres bevat.

Want zeg hou zelf:

Wat is er bizarder dan eerst zelf een oorlog starten en er vervolgens

over klagen, dat je niet op de hoogte gebrachte bondgenoten, die je

regelmatig verrot scheldt, je niet komen helpen, aldus president Trump [2]/HAHAHA

GOED

Ter zake:

Zoals u weet volg ik nOS teletekst al jaren kritisch, vaak met

kritiek, maar soms ook met complimenten [3]

Vandaag is het tijd voor complimenten, maar ook kritische kanttekeningen!

COMPLIMENT!

Ik was aangenaam verrast te lezen in uw berichtgeving [zie geheel onderin] [4], dat

u duidelijk refereert aan de bezette status van de Westelijke Jordaanoever,

dat u de illegaliteit van de Israelische nederzettingen benoemt en een stem

geeft aan de Israelische mensenrechtenorganisatie Yesh Din.

Goed zo!

Wat u minder handig doet is de exacte formulering van die illegaliteit, u

geeft niet aan wat ”Yetnews” is  en in welke context Yesh Din spreekt over

”etnische zuiveringen”

KRITIEK

FORMULERING ILLEGALITEIT NEDERZETTINGEN

Ten eerste uw formulering van de illegaliteit van de Israelische

nederzettingen:

U schrijft

”Afgelopen 3,5 jaar werden er onder premier Netanyahu al 69

nederzettingen goedgekeurd op de Westoever, dat volgens Internationaal Recht Palestijns gebied is.”
Nu is uw bericht in de strekking juist, maar volkomen verwarrend voor mensen,
die niet goed op de hoogte zijn.
Want wat staat er nu precies:
Dat de Westoever volgens Internationaal Recht Palestijns gebied is [nogal wiedes: het is bezet gebied]
Of dat die nederzettingen volgens Internationaal Recht bezet gebied zijn?
Volgens mij wilt u dat laatste zeggen, formuleer dat dan ook duidelijk
Want dat klopt:
Niet alleen zijn de Israelische nedderzettingen in bezet Palestijns gebied in
strijd met het Internationaal Recht [5], het is onderdeel van een groter geheel-dat wordt vaak uit het oog verloren- dat ALLE in bezet gebied, waar ook ter wereld gebouwde nederzettingen, in strijd zijn met het Internationaal Recht ! [6]
Nou hoeft u er dat laatste punt niet altijd bij te halen-dat was meer voor uw informatie- maar wel moet u duideijk de illegaliteit van de Israelische nederzettingen formuleren, terwijl het al duideijk is, dat de Westelijke Jordaanoever ”Palwstijns gebied” is [wat u al aangaf voor het bezette karakter te noemen]
Duidelijker formuleren dus:
Aanbevolen tekst:
“”De Israelische nederzettingen in bezet Palestijns gebied zijn in strijd met het
Internationaal Recht”
KRITIEK
YETNEWS
Verder refereert u aan ”Yetnews”, zonder daarbij te vermelden, dat dat
een Israelische newswebsite is [7]
Let daar voortaan op.
KRITIEK
YESH DIN EN DE ETNISCHE ZUIVERINGEN
En dan nog belangrijker dan voorgaande opmerking
U schrijft
\\Israel wilde het besluit op verzoek van de VS stilhouden zolang
de oorlog met Iran gaande was, schrijft Yetnews.
De Israelische mensenrechtengroep Yesh Din spreekt van etnische zuivering”
Ten eerste
Goed dat u deze groep noemt, maar van belang is, dat u aangeeft, dat zij zich richten tegen de nederzettingen en de desastreuze gevolgen daarvan [8
Daarnaast maakt u voor de lezer het verband tussen de komst van nederzettingen en etnische zuiveringen niet geheel duidelijk en ook niet
wat etnische zuiveringen precies zijn.
Ik adviseer dan ook, dat u duidelijk maakt wat ”etnische zuiveringen” zijn, namelijk verdrijving van bevolkingsgroepen [9]
Ik benadruk dit omdat niet iedereen dat weet
En -volgens The Times of Israel- Yesh Din bedoelt met dit verband dan weer,
dat de komst van nog meer nederzettingen een stap is in de richting van de etnische zuivering van de hele Westelijke Jordaanoever [10]
Dat moet u in uw berichtgeving duidelijker maken.
Als u bovenstaande adviezen en kritiekpunten van mij overneemt, zult u uw
berichtgeving aanzienlijk kunnen verbeteren
VAN HARTE BETERSCHAP TOEGEWENST
Vriendelijke groeten
Astrid Essed
Amsterdam
NOTEN
NOTEN 1 EN 2
NOTEN 3 EN 4
NOTEN 5 EN 6
NOTEN 7 EN 8
NOTEN 9 EN 10

NOS TELETEKST

ISRAEL KEURT 34 NEDERZETTINGEN GOED
10 APRIL 2026
Het Israelische kabinet heeft bijna twee weken geleden goedkeuring
gegeven voor tientallen nederzettingen op de door Israel bezette
Westelijke Jordaanoever, melden Israelische media.
Het gaat om de bouw van nieuwe nederzettingen en om de
legalisering van bestaande projecten.
Afgelopen 3,5 jaar werden er onder premier Netanyahu al 69
nederzettingen goedgekeurd op de Westoever, dat volgens Internationaal Recht Palestijns gebied is.
Israel wilde het besluit op verzoek van de VS stilhouden zolang
de oorlog met Iran gaande was, schrijft Yetnews.
De Israelische mensenrechtengroep Yesh Din spreekt van etnische zuivering
EINDE NOS TELETEKST BERICHT
ORIGINEEL NOS TELETEKST BERICHT

    Israël keurt 34 nederzettingen goed 

 Het Israëlische kabinet heeft bijna  
 twee weken geleden goedkeuring gegeven 
 voor tientallen nederzettingen op de   
 door Israël bezette Westelijke         
 Jordaanoever,melden Israëlische media. 
                                        
 Het gaat om de bouw van nieuwe         
 nederzettingen en om de legalisering   
 van bestaande projecten.Afgelopen 3,5  
 jaar werden er onder premier Netanyahu 
 al 69 nederzettingen goedgekeurd op de 
 Westoever,dat volgens internationaal   
 recht Palestijns gebied is.            
                                        
 Israël wilde het besluit op verzoek van
 de VS stilhouden zolang de oorlog met  
 Iran gaande was,schrijft Ynetnews.De   
 Israëlische mensenrechtengroep Yesh Din
 spreekt van etnische zuivering.        

 nieuws  buitenland  binnenland  sport

Reacties uitgeschakeld voor NOOT 5/WEER NOS TELETEKST

Opgeslagen onder Divers

NOOT 6/WEER NOS TELETEKST

[6]
BTSELEM
E1 NOT ISRAELI TERRITORY
Miriam Leedor, director of public outreach at B’Tselem , in an Op-ed originally published by Ynetnews website: According to int’l law, ‘state-owned’ lands in West Bank can be used only for the benefit of the local Palestinian population Miriam Leedor
 

The controversy surrounding the government’s decision to promote the construction of thousands of housing units in the E1 zone, which will connect Ma’ale Adumim and Jerusalem and cut through the West Bank, is view by pundits and politicians alike as a serious diplomatic problem, but not a legal one.

It is assumed that most of the area has been declared as state-owned land, meaning it belongs to the government, which can do whatever it wants with it. This assumption is completely false. Over the years Israel’s governments have allotted “state-owned” lands in the West Bank almost exclusively for the use of settlements, in direct violation of international law.

As of today, 1.4 million dunams (346,000 acres) in the West Bank (some 26% of the entire territory) are defined as state-owned land. Some 527,000 of the dunams (130,000 acres), mainly in the Jordan Valley, were considered state-owned land when Jordan ruled over the region. Since the High Court of Justice ruled in 1979 that it is illegal to build settlements on private Palestinian land, the settlement enterprise has been based on the use of state-owned lands. To this end, between 1979 and 2002 Israel has declared more than 900,000 dunams (about 222,000 acres) as state-owned land, an addition of some 170%. Most of these lands were defined as being within the limits of the settlements’ local or regional councils.

According to international law, publicly-owned areas in the West Bank also belong to the Palestinian population that resides within them. The West Bank was never annexed to Israel’s sovereign territory (such a unilateral annexation would be illegal); it is under Israeli military rule. Military rule means that the state holds the territory only as a trustee.

International law clearly determines that Israel can use the territory only to provide for the needs of the local population or to serve its military and security-related needs. Building permanent communities that are populated by Israeli civilians, the advancement of Israeli industrial and tourism projects, exploiting the area’s resources (including water) – all of these are forbidden. These resources must be used to serve the needs of the Palestinian population alone.

Despite the legal restrictions, since taking over the West Bank Israel has classified hundreds of thousands of dunams as state-owned land. These areas were robbed from the Palestinian population and are used almost exclusively by the settlements, which were established illegally. Classifying these areas as “state-owned” and transferring them to the settlements has had severe effects on the local Palestinian population: The livelihood of the shepherds and farmers has been taken away; Palestinian communities cannot expand and develop; and lands that were supposed to be designated for the development of Palestinian industry, tourism and agriculture have been robbed.

It is not just settlement building that is wrong. As strange as this may sound to Israelis, who consider natural resources to be Israeli property, we are not allowed to open beaches and factories in the northern Dead Sea; we are not allowed to develop tourism projects in areas we do not own and we are forbidden from exploiting the resources of the conquered land. These resources can only be used for the benefit of the local Palestinian population.

The government’s policy is not new, but the fact that we have been acting this way for decades does not make it right. “State-owned” lands are meant for the use of the Palestinians. The only exception that allows Israel to use conquered lands is when these lands are needed in order to meet a military need. The plan to build thousands of settler homes in E1 has nothing to do with Israel’s military needs.

Reacties uitgeschakeld voor NOOT 6/WEER NOS TELETEKST

Opgeslagen onder Divers

NOOT 7/WEER NOS TELETEKST

[7]
E1 (short for “East 1”; Hebrewמְבַשֶּׂרֶת אֲדֻמִּיםromanizedMevaseret Adumimlit.‘Herald of Adumim’), also called the E1 areaE1 zone or E1 corridor, is an area of the Israeli-occupied West Bank within the municipal boundary of the Israeli settlement[1] of Ma’ale Adumim.”
WIKIPEDIA
E1 (WEST BANK)
Ma’ale Adumim (Hebrewמַעֲלֵה אֲדֻמִּיםArabicمعالي أدوميم) is an urban Israeli settlement organized as a city council in the West Bank, seven kilometers (4

+1⁄2 miles) east of Jerusalem.”

WIKIPEDIA
MA’ALE ADUMIN

Reacties uitgeschakeld voor NOOT 7/WEER NOS TELETEKST

Opgeslagen onder Divers

NOOT 8/WEER NOS TELETEKST

[8]
Ma’ale Adumim (Hebrewמַעֲלֵה אֲדֻמִּיםArabicمعالي أدوميم) is an urban Israeli settlement organized as a city council in the West Bank, seven kilometers (4

+1⁄2 miles) east of Jerusalem.”

WIKIPEDIA
MA’ALE ADUMIN

Reacties uitgeschakeld voor NOOT 8/WEER NOS TELETEKST

Opgeslagen onder Divers

NOTEN 9 T/M 11/WEER NOS TELETEKST

[9]
[10]
[11]

ARTICLE 49, FOURTH GENEVA CONVENTION

The Occupying Power shall not deport or transfer parts of its own civilian population into the territory it occupies.

ARTICLE 49, FOURTH GENEVA CONVENTION

https://ihl-databases.icrc.org/en/ihl-treaties/gciv-1949/article-49?activeTab=

ARTICLE 55, THE HAGUE CONVENTION, 1907

The occupying State shall be regarded only as administrator and usufructuary of public buildings, real estate, forests, and agricultural estates belonging to the hostile State, and situated in the occupied country. It must safeguard the capital of these properties, and administer them in accordance with the rules of usufruct.

https://ihl-databases.icrc.org/en/ihl-treaties/hague-conv-iv-1907/regulations-art-55?activeTab=

SEE ALSO

https://www.astridessed.nl/about-the-illegal-character-of-settlements-in-occupied-territories/

Reacties uitgeschakeld voor NOTEN 9 T/M 11/WEER NOS TELETEKST

Opgeslagen onder Divers

NOOT 12/WEER NOS TELETEKST

[12]
”International law is clear that Israeli settlements in the West Bank are illegal.”
JOINT STATEMENT ON ISRAELI GOVERNMENT’S DECISION TO PUBLIC CONSTRUCTION TENDERS FOR THE E1 SETTLEMENT PROJECT
20 AUGUST 2026

Statement by the leaders of Canada, France, Germany, Italy, Netherlands, Norway, and the United Kingdom on the Israeli Government’s decision to publish construction tenders for the E1 settlement project.

“The Israeli Government’s decision to publish construction tenders for the E1 settlement project is unacceptable. The international community has long opposed this settlement expansion, and has voiced their grave concerns privately and publicly. The E1 settlement will undermine the prospect of the two-state solution by driving a wedge through the West Bank and harming the territorial contiguity of the Palestinian Territories.

International law is clear that Israeli settlements in the West Bank are illegal. This is the position of the international community reaffirmed by the United Nations Security Council.

At a time of grave instability in the West Bank with unprecedented levels of violence by settlers against civilians, and serious restrictions on the Palestinian economy, this decision is even more concerning.

We urge the Government of Israel to retract these plans immediately and end its expansion of settlements in the West Bank. Not only will they take us further from peace, but they further undermine Israel’s international standing.

Businesses should not consider bidding for construction tenders. They should be aware of legal and reputational consequences including the risk of involving themselves in serious breaches of international law.

We reiterate our commitment to a comprehensive, just and lasting peace based on the two-state solution. We will continue to act in its interest.

Reacties uitgeschakeld voor NOOT 12/WEER NOS TELETEKST

Opgeslagen onder Divers