NOOT 5/WEER NOS TELETEKST

[5]
ZIE OOK MAIL ASTRID ESSED AAN NOS TELETEKSTREDACTIE

Uw berichtgeving dd 10 april 2026: ”Israel keurt 34 nederzettingen goed”

Inbox
 
AAN

NOS Teletekst
Onderwerp:
Uw berichtgeving dd 10 april 2026: ”Israel keurt 34 nederzettingen goed”

De walrus sprak:

De tijd is daar
Om over allerlei te praten”

Een schoen, een schip, een kandelaar,

Of koningen ook liegen

En of de zee soms koken kan

En een biggetje kan vliegen.
Uit het Engels vertaald uit:

THE WALRUS AND THE CARPENTERLEWIS CARROLL: ALICE IN WONDERLAND
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Walrus_and_the_Carpenter

”IN HET KORT:

U geeft de exacte formulering van de illegaliteit vn de nederzettingen niet aan, u

geeft niet aan wat ”Yetnews” is  en in welke context Yesh Din spreekt over

”etnische zuiveringen”

Geachte Redactie,

Met deze onvergetelijke klassieker uit Alice in Wonderland [1] over de bizarheid van het leven start ik mijn

mail, die zowel complimenten als kritiek aan uw adres bevat.

Want zeg hou zelf:

Wat is er bizarder dan eerst zelf een oorlog starten en er vervolgens

over klagen, dat je niet op de hoogte gebrachte bondgenoten, die je

regelmatig verrot scheldt, je niet komen helpen, aldus president Trump [2]/HAHAHA

GOED

Ter zake:

Zoals u weet volg ik nOS teletekst al jaren kritisch, vaak met

kritiek, maar soms ook met complimenten [3]

Vandaag is het tijd voor complimenten, maar ook kritische kanttekeningen!

COMPLIMENT!

Ik was aangenaam verrast te lezen in uw berichtgeving [zie geheel onderin] [4], dat

u duidelijk refereert aan de bezette status van de Westelijke Jordaanoever,

dat u de illegaliteit van de Israelische nederzettingen benoemt en een stem

geeft aan de Israelische mensenrechtenorganisatie Yesh Din.

Goed zo!

Wat u minder handig doet is de exacte formulering van die illegaliteit, u

geeft niet aan wat ”Yetnews” is  en in welke context Yesh Din spreekt over

”etnische zuiveringen”

KRITIEK

FORMULERING ILLEGALITEIT NEDERZETTINGEN

Ten eerste uw formulering van de illegaliteit van de Israelische

nederzettingen:

U schrijft

”Afgelopen 3,5 jaar werden er onder premier Netanyahu al 69

nederzettingen goedgekeurd op de Westoever, dat volgens Internationaal Recht Palestijns gebied is.”
Nu is uw bericht in de strekking juist, maar volkomen verwarrend voor mensen,
die niet goed op de hoogte zijn.
Want wat staat er nu precies:
Dat de Westoever volgens Internationaal Recht Palestijns gebied is [nogal wiedes: het is bezet gebied]
Of dat die nederzettingen volgens Internationaal Recht bezet gebied zijn?
Volgens mij wilt u dat laatste zeggen, formuleer dat dan ook duidelijk
Want dat klopt:
Niet alleen zijn de Israelische nedderzettingen in bezet Palestijns gebied in
strijd met het Internationaal Recht [5], het is onderdeel van een groter geheel-dat wordt vaak uit het oog verloren- dat ALLE in bezet gebied, waar ook ter wereld gebouwde nederzettingen, in strijd zijn met het Internationaal Recht ! [6]
Nou hoeft u er dat laatste punt niet altijd bij te halen-dat was meer voor uw informatie- maar wel moet u duideijk de illegaliteit van de Israelische nederzettingen formuleren, terwijl het al duideijk is, dat de Westelijke Jordaanoever ”Palwstijns gebied” is [wat u al aangaf voor het bezette karakter te noemen]
Duidelijker formuleren dus:
Aanbevolen tekst:
“”De Israelische nederzettingen in bezet Palestijns gebied zijn in strijd met het
Internationaal Recht”
KRITIEK
YETNEWS
Verder refereert u aan ”Yetnews”, zonder daarbij te vermelden, dat dat
een Israelische newswebsite is [7]
Let daar voortaan op.
KRITIEK
YESH DIN EN DE ETNISCHE ZUIVERINGEN
En dan nog belangrijker dan voorgaande opmerking
U schrijft
\\Israel wilde het besluit op verzoek van de VS stilhouden zolang
de oorlog met Iran gaande was, schrijft Yetnews.
De Israelische mensenrechtengroep Yesh Din spreekt van etnische zuivering”
Ten eerste
Goed dat u deze groep noemt, maar van belang is, dat u aangeeft, dat zij zich richten tegen de nederzettingen en de desastreuze gevolgen daarvan [8
Daarnaast maakt u voor de lezer het verband tussen de komst van nederzettingen en etnische zuiveringen niet geheel duidelijk en ook niet
wat etnische zuiveringen precies zijn.
Ik adviseer dan ook, dat u duidelijk maakt wat ”etnische zuiveringen” zijn, namelijk verdrijving van bevolkingsgroepen [9]
Ik benadruk dit omdat niet iedereen dat weet
En -volgens The Times of Israel- Yesh Din bedoelt met dit verband dan weer,
dat de komst van nog meer nederzettingen een stap is in de richting van de etnische zuivering van de hele Westelijke Jordaanoever [10]
Dat moet u in uw berichtgeving duidelijker maken.
Als u bovenstaande adviezen en kritiekpunten van mij overneemt, zult u uw
berichtgeving aanzienlijk kunnen verbeteren
VAN HARTE BETERSCHAP TOEGEWENST
Vriendelijke groeten
Astrid Essed
Amsterdam
NOTEN
NOTEN 1 EN 2
NOTEN 3 EN 4
NOTEN 5 EN 6
NOTEN 7 EN 8
NOTEN 9 EN 10

NOS TELETEKST

ISRAEL KEURT 34 NEDERZETTINGEN GOED
10 APRIL 2026
Het Israelische kabinet heeft bijna twee weken geleden goedkeuring
gegeven voor tientallen nederzettingen op de door Israel bezette
Westelijke Jordaanoever, melden Israelische media.
Het gaat om de bouw van nieuwe nederzettingen en om de
legalisering van bestaande projecten.
Afgelopen 3,5 jaar werden er onder premier Netanyahu al 69
nederzettingen goedgekeurd op de Westoever, dat volgens Internationaal Recht Palestijns gebied is.
Israel wilde het besluit op verzoek van de VS stilhouden zolang
de oorlog met Iran gaande was, schrijft Yetnews.
De Israelische mensenrechtengroep Yesh Din spreekt van etnische zuivering
EINDE NOS TELETEKST BERICHT
ORIGINEEL NOS TELETEKST BERICHT

    Israël keurt 34 nederzettingen goed 

 Het Israëlische kabinet heeft bijna  
 twee weken geleden goedkeuring gegeven 
 voor tientallen nederzettingen op de   
 door Israël bezette Westelijke         
 Jordaanoever,melden Israëlische media. 
                                        
 Het gaat om de bouw van nieuwe         
 nederzettingen en om de legalisering   
 van bestaande projecten.Afgelopen 3,5  
 jaar werden er onder premier Netanyahu 
 al 69 nederzettingen goedgekeurd op de 
 Westoever,dat volgens internationaal   
 recht Palestijns gebied is.            
                                        
 Israël wilde het besluit op verzoek van
 de VS stilhouden zolang de oorlog met  
 Iran gaande was,schrijft Ynetnews.De   
 Israëlische mensenrechtengroep Yesh Din
 spreekt van etnische zuivering.        

 nieuws  buitenland  binnenland  sport

Reacties uitgeschakeld voor NOOT 5/WEER NOS TELETEKST

Opgeslagen onder Divers

NOOT 6/WEER NOS TELETEKST

[6]
BTSELEM
E1 NOT ISRAELI TERRITORY
Miriam Leedor, director of public outreach at B’Tselem , in an Op-ed originally published by Ynetnews website: According to int’l law, ‘state-owned’ lands in West Bank can be used only for the benefit of the local Palestinian population Miriam Leedor
 

The controversy surrounding the government’s decision to promote the construction of thousands of housing units in the E1 zone, which will connect Ma’ale Adumim and Jerusalem and cut through the West Bank, is view by pundits and politicians alike as a serious diplomatic problem, but not a legal one.

It is assumed that most of the area has been declared as state-owned land, meaning it belongs to the government, which can do whatever it wants with it. This assumption is completely false. Over the years Israel’s governments have allotted “state-owned” lands in the West Bank almost exclusively for the use of settlements, in direct violation of international law.

As of today, 1.4 million dunams (346,000 acres) in the West Bank (some 26% of the entire territory) are defined as state-owned land. Some 527,000 of the dunams (130,000 acres), mainly in the Jordan Valley, were considered state-owned land when Jordan ruled over the region. Since the High Court of Justice ruled in 1979 that it is illegal to build settlements on private Palestinian land, the settlement enterprise has been based on the use of state-owned lands. To this end, between 1979 and 2002 Israel has declared more than 900,000 dunams (about 222,000 acres) as state-owned land, an addition of some 170%. Most of these lands were defined as being within the limits of the settlements’ local or regional councils.

According to international law, publicly-owned areas in the West Bank also belong to the Palestinian population that resides within them. The West Bank was never annexed to Israel’s sovereign territory (such a unilateral annexation would be illegal); it is under Israeli military rule. Military rule means that the state holds the territory only as a trustee.

International law clearly determines that Israel can use the territory only to provide for the needs of the local population or to serve its military and security-related needs. Building permanent communities that are populated by Israeli civilians, the advancement of Israeli industrial and tourism projects, exploiting the area’s resources (including water) – all of these are forbidden. These resources must be used to serve the needs of the Palestinian population alone.

Despite the legal restrictions, since taking over the West Bank Israel has classified hundreds of thousands of dunams as state-owned land. These areas were robbed from the Palestinian population and are used almost exclusively by the settlements, which were established illegally. Classifying these areas as “state-owned” and transferring them to the settlements has had severe effects on the local Palestinian population: The livelihood of the shepherds and farmers has been taken away; Palestinian communities cannot expand and develop; and lands that were supposed to be designated for the development of Palestinian industry, tourism and agriculture have been robbed.

It is not just settlement building that is wrong. As strange as this may sound to Israelis, who consider natural resources to be Israeli property, we are not allowed to open beaches and factories in the northern Dead Sea; we are not allowed to develop tourism projects in areas we do not own and we are forbidden from exploiting the resources of the conquered land. These resources can only be used for the benefit of the local Palestinian population.

The government’s policy is not new, but the fact that we have been acting this way for decades does not make it right. “State-owned” lands are meant for the use of the Palestinians. The only exception that allows Israel to use conquered lands is when these lands are needed in order to meet a military need. The plan to build thousands of settler homes in E1 has nothing to do with Israel’s military needs.

Reacties uitgeschakeld voor NOOT 6/WEER NOS TELETEKST

Opgeslagen onder Divers

NOOT 7/WEER NOS TELETEKST

[7]
E1 (short for “East 1”; Hebrewמְבַשֶּׂרֶת אֲדֻמִּיםromanizedMevaseret Adumimlit.‘Herald of Adumim’), also called the E1 areaE1 zone or E1 corridor, is an area of the Israeli-occupied West Bank within the municipal boundary of the Israeli settlement[1] of Ma’ale Adumim.”
WIKIPEDIA
E1 (WEST BANK)
Ma’ale Adumim (Hebrewמַעֲלֵה אֲדֻמִּיםArabicمعالي أدوميم) is an urban Israeli settlement organized as a city council in the West Bank, seven kilometers (4

+1⁄2 miles) east of Jerusalem.”

WIKIPEDIA
MA’ALE ADUMIN

Reacties uitgeschakeld voor NOOT 7/WEER NOS TELETEKST

Opgeslagen onder Divers

NOOT 8/WEER NOS TELETEKST

[8]
Ma’ale Adumim (Hebrewמַעֲלֵה אֲדֻמִּיםArabicمعالي أدوميم) is an urban Israeli settlement organized as a city council in the West Bank, seven kilometers (4

+1⁄2 miles) east of Jerusalem.”

WIKIPEDIA
MA’ALE ADUMIN

Reacties uitgeschakeld voor NOOT 8/WEER NOS TELETEKST

Opgeslagen onder Divers

NOTEN 9 T/M 11/WEER NOS TELETEKST

[9]
[10]
[11]

ARTICLE 49, FOURTH GENEVA CONVENTION

The Occupying Power shall not deport or transfer parts of its own civilian population into the territory it occupies.

ARTICLE 49, FOURTH GENEVA CONVENTION

https://ihl-databases.icrc.org/en/ihl-treaties/gciv-1949/article-49?activeTab=

ARTICLE 55, THE HAGUE CONVENTION, 1907

The occupying State shall be regarded only as administrator and usufructuary of public buildings, real estate, forests, and agricultural estates belonging to the hostile State, and situated in the occupied country. It must safeguard the capital of these properties, and administer them in accordance with the rules of usufruct.

https://ihl-databases.icrc.org/en/ihl-treaties/hague-conv-iv-1907/regulations-art-55?activeTab=

SEE ALSO

https://www.astridessed.nl/about-the-illegal-character-of-settlements-in-occupied-territories/

Reacties uitgeschakeld voor NOTEN 9 T/M 11/WEER NOS TELETEKST

Opgeslagen onder Divers

NOOT 12/WEER NOS TELETEKST

[12]
”International law is clear that Israeli settlements in the West Bank are illegal.”
JOINT STATEMENT ON ISRAELI GOVERNMENT’S DECISION TO PUBLIC CONSTRUCTION TENDERS FOR THE E1 SETTLEMENT PROJECT
20 AUGUST 2026

Statement by the leaders of Canada, France, Germany, Italy, Netherlands, Norway, and the United Kingdom on the Israeli Government’s decision to publish construction tenders for the E1 settlement project.

“The Israeli Government’s decision to publish construction tenders for the E1 settlement project is unacceptable. The international community has long opposed this settlement expansion, and has voiced their grave concerns privately and publicly. The E1 settlement will undermine the prospect of the two-state solution by driving a wedge through the West Bank and harming the territorial contiguity of the Palestinian Territories.

International law is clear that Israeli settlements in the West Bank are illegal. This is the position of the international community reaffirmed by the United Nations Security Council.

At a time of grave instability in the West Bank with unprecedented levels of violence by settlers against civilians, and serious restrictions on the Palestinian economy, this decision is even more concerning.

We urge the Government of Israel to retract these plans immediately and end its expansion of settlements in the West Bank. Not only will they take us further from peace, but they further undermine Israel’s international standing.

Businesses should not consider bidding for construction tenders. They should be aware of legal and reputational consequences including the risk of involving themselves in serious breaches of international law.

We reiterate our commitment to a comprehensive, just and lasting peace based on the two-state solution. We will continue to act in its interest.

Reacties uitgeschakeld voor NOOT 12/WEER NOS TELETEKST

Opgeslagen onder Divers

NOTEN 13 EN 14/WEER NOS TELETEKST

[14]
The Gaza Strip remains occupied even after the withdrawal of Israeli forces and removal of settlers in 2005 as Israel has retained effective control over the territory and its population, including through its control of its borders, territorial waters, air space, and population registry.
AMNESTY INTERNATIONAL

Israel must end its occupation of Palestine to stop fuelling apartheid and systematic human rights violations

19 FEBRUARY 2024

Israel must end its brutal occupation of Gaza and the West Bank, including East Jerusalem, which it has maintained since 1967, said Amnesty International, as public hearings begin at the International Court of Justice (ICJ) to examine the legal consequences of Israel’s prolonged occupation.

The public hearings are taking place in the Hague from 19 to 26 February after the UN General Assembly adopted a resolution in December 2022 to request an advisory opinion from the ICJ on the legality of Israel’s policies and practices in the Occupied Palestinian Territories (OPT) and the consequences of Israel’s conduct for other states and the UN. More than 50 states, the African Union, the Arab League and Organisation of Islamic Cooperation are scheduled to participate in the proceedings.

The world must recognize that ending Israel’s illegal occupation is a prerequisite to stopping the recurrent human rights violations in Israel and the OPT.

Agnès Callamard, Amnesty International’s Secretary General

“Israel’s occupation of Palestine is the longest and one of the most deadly military occupations in the world. For decades it has been characterised by widespread and systematic human rights violations against Palestinians. The occupation has also enabled and entrenched Israel’s system of apartheid imposed on Palestinians,” said Agnès Callamard, Amnesty International’s Secretary General.

“Over the years, Israel’s military occupation has evolved into a perpetual occupation in flagrant violation of international law.

“The current conflict raging in the occupied Gaza Strip, where the ICJ has ruled there is a real and imminent risk of genocide, has brought into sharp focus the catastrophic consequences of allowing Israel’s international crimes in the OPT to continue with impunity for so long. The world must recognize that ending Israel’s illegal occupation is a prerequisite to stopping the recurrent human rights violations in Israel and the OPT.”

‘Perpetual’ occupation

Under international humanitarian law, occupation of a territory during a conflict is meant to be temporary. The occupying power is required to administer the territory in the interest of the occupied population and to preserve as much as possible the situation that existed at the beginning of the occupation, including by respecting existing laws and refraining from introducing demographic changes and tampering with the territorial integrity of the occupied territory.

Israel’s occupation has failed to align with these basic principles of international humanitarian law. The duration of Israel’s occupation – spanning more than half a century – coupled with the authorities’ illegal official annexation of occupied East Jerusalem and de facto annexation of large swathes of the West Bank through land confiscation and settlement expansion, provide clear evidence that Israel’s intention is for the occupation to be permanent and for the benefit of the occupying power and its own citizens.

The Gaza Strip remains occupied even after the withdrawal of Israeli forces and removal of settlers in 2005 as Israel has retained effective control over the territory and its population, including through its control of its borders, territorial waters, air space, and population registry. For 16 years, the occupation has been experienced in Gaza through Israel’s illegal blockade that has severely restricted movement of people and goods and has devastated Gaza’s economy, and through repeated episodes of hostilities that have killed and injured thousands of civilians and destroyed much of Gaza’s infrastructure and housing.

“All states must review their relations with Israel to ensure that they are not contributing to sustaining the occupation or the system of apartheid. As European foreign ministers gather in Brussels today, the need to make a clear and united call for an end to Israel’s occupation has never been more urgent,” said Agnès Callamard.

Life under occupation

Palestinians living under Israeli occupation are subjected to a myriad of human rights violations, maintained by an institutionalized regime of systematic domination and oppression. The discriminatory and repressive laws, ostensibly adopted as part of the occupation but effectively serving the objectives of the Israel’s system of apartheid, have fragmented and segregated Palestinians across the OPT, while unlawfully exploiting their resources, arbitrarily restricting their rights and freedoms and controlling almost every aspect of their lives.

Even before the latest hostilities, Palestinians in Gaza had been subjected to numerous Israeli military offensives – at least six between 2008 and 2023 – in addition to an enduring land, air, and sea blockade, which has helped maintain Israel’s effective control and occupation of Gaza. During those offensives, Amnesty International documented a recurrent pattern of unlawful attacks, amounting to war crimes and even crimes against humanity, while the enduring blockade constitutes collective punishment, also a war crime.

For 56 years Palestinians in the OPT have been living trapped and oppressed under Israel’s brutal occupation, subjected to systemic discrimination.

Agnès Callamard, Amnesty International’s Secretary General

In the West Bank, including occupied East Jerusalem, Palestinians routinely face excessive use of force, unlawful killings, arbitrary arrest, administrative detention, forced displacement, home demolitions, confiscation of land and natural resources, and denial of fundamental rights and freedoms. Israel’s multi-layered closure system, fortified by mass surveillance, physical barriers and legal restrictions, including an illegal wall/fence, hundreds of checkpoints and roadblocks, and an arbitrary permit regime, has curtailed Palestinians’ freedom of movement and perpetuated their disenfranchisement.

Among the most emblematic examples of Israel’s outright disregard for international law has been the establishment and incessant spread of Israeli settlements throughout the OPT and the illegal annexation of occupied East Jerusalem immediately after the 1967 war which was constitutionally enshrined in 1980. There are currently at least 300 illegal Israeli settlements and outposts in the West Bank, including in occupied East Jerusalem, with a population of over 700,000 Israeli settlers.

“For 56 years Palestinians in the OPT have been living trapped and oppressed under Israel’s brutal occupation, subjected to systemic discrimination. Every aspect of their daily lives is disrupted and controlled by Israeli authorities, who place restrictions on their rights to move around, earn a living, pursue educational and professional aspirations, and enjoy a decent quality of life, as well as depriving them of access to their land and natural resources,” said Agnès Callamard.

“Israel has also continued its vicious land grab policies relentlessly expanding illegal settlements in violation of international law with devastating consequences for Palestinians’ human rights and security. Violent Israeli settlers have been attacking Palestinians for decades with virtually total impunity.”

A draconian system of control

Israel’s draconian system of control over the OPT includes a large network of military checkpoints, fences/ walls and military bases and patrols as well as a string of repressive military orders.

Israel’s control of the OPT’s borders, the population registry, the supply of water, electricity, telecommunication services, humanitarian and development assistance, and the imposition of its currency have had devastating effects on the economic and social developments of the Palestinian people in the OPT.

This control has reached unprecedented levels of cruelty in the Gaza Strip where Israel has maintained a 16-year illegal blockade which has been further tightened since 9 October 2023. The blockade, coupled with Israel’s recurrent military operations have plunged the Gaza Strip into one of the gravest humanitarian and human rights crisis of modern times.

“As the occupying power Israel has an obligation to ensure the protection and welfare of all those residing in the territory it controls. Instead, it has perpetrated gross and systematic human rights violations with impunity. Israel cites the need to maintain security as the reason for its cruel policies. But security can never justify apartheid, illegal annexation and settlements, or war crimes against the protected population. The only way to ensure security for Israelis and Palestinians is to uphold human rights for all,” said Agnès Callamard.

Ending the occupation would mean restoring Palestinians’ rights by lifting the brutal blockade on Gaza, dismantling Israeli settlements in the West Bank, including East Jerusalem and reversing its illegal annexation. It would allow Palestinians to move freely in the areas where they live and allow families separated by different identification legal statuses – such as the Jerusalem residency and West Bank or Gaza Strip – to be reunited. It would alleviate mass suffering and end widescale human rights violations.

It would also contribute to tackling one of the root causes of the recurrent violence and war crimes against Israelis, thus helping to improve human rights protection and secure justice and reparation for victims on all sides.

Background

On 30 December 2022, the UN General Assembly adopted resolution A/RES/77/247, in which, it requested the International Court of Justice for an advisory opinion on key questions regarding the legal consequences arising from its prolonged occupation, and settlement and annexation of the Palestinian territory occupied since 1967, how the policies and practices of Israel affect the legal status of the occupation and what legal consequences arise for all states and the UN from this status.

The Court is expected to issue its advisory opinion later this year.

For six decades, Amnesty International has been documenting how Israeli forces have committed grave human rights violations in the OPT with impunity.  In 2022, the organization issued Israel’s apartheid against Palestinians: Cruel system of domination and crime against humanity, a report which highlights the entrenched role that Israel’s military and its occupation have had in perpetuating the system of apartheid. Many of the report’s findings and recommendations underline the urgent need for an end to Israel’s occupation to remove the environment that enables the commission of crimes against humanity and war crimes.

END

Reacties uitgeschakeld voor NOTEN 13 EN 14/WEER NOS TELETEKST

Opgeslagen onder Divers

Bridgerton/About Penelope Featherington, alias Lady Whistledown/About Pain, Cruelty, Manipulation and a Mother’s Betrayal

Penelope Bridgerton | Bridgerton Wiki | Fandom
PENELOPE FEATHERINGTON ALIAS LADY WHISTLEDOWN

ABOUT PENELOPE FEATHERINGTON, ALIAS LADY WHISTLEDOWN/ABOUT PAIN, CRUELTY, MANIPULATION AND A MOTHER’S BETRAYAL

HALLO FOLKS
IN ADVANCE
ADDITION
LET US MAKE THIS CRYSTAL CLEAR FROM THE BEGINNIG
OF COURSE I understand Penelope Feathering’s pain, being treated badly by her mother and sisters and being laughed at on balls and for that I do sympathise with her, but what is a Red Line for me is NOT that she started a rather spicy gossip sheet [I can understand her need for revenge on people who treated her badly] but that she went too far and became utterly malicious, trying to ruin her best friend Eloise and her cousin Marina, who was friendly to her [the fact that Colin loved Marina and not Pen is no excuse for ruin her, at most to play a trick on her……] [IA]
LET’S GO!
Here is your dedicated Bridgerton Fan again, who already wrote a lot about the series! [1]
Although I am writing about a complete different subject in the Bridgerton Series at the moment, namely about the Anthony Bridgeron and Siena Rosso Love Relationship [2] I simply couldn’t resist the temptation to give you my first commentary on Penelope Featherington, alias Lady Whistledown [3]
 I will write a lot more about this lady in the future !
MY FIRST, SHORT COMMENT ABOUT THIS LADY
And as I wrote above in my article:
LET US MAKE THIS CRYSTAL CLEAR FROM THE BEGINNIG
OF COURSE I understand Penelope Feathering’s pain, being treated badly by her mother and sisters and being laughed at on balls and for that I do sympathise with her, but what is a Red Line for me is not that she started a rather spicy gossip sheet [I can understand her need for revenge on people who treated her badly] but that she went too far and became utterly malicious, trying to ruin her best friend Eloise and her cousin Marina, who was friendly to her [the fact that Colin loved Marina and not Pen is no excuse for ruin her, at most to play a trick on her……]
AGAIN:
NO EXCUSE WHATSOEVER FOR TRYING TO  RUIN A PERSON’S COMPLETELY
THERE I DRAW THE RED LINE!
MORE ABOUT LA PENELOPE/HAHA
Lady Whistledown turned out to be Pen Featherington, who, for reasons incomprehensible to fans, managed to become the wife of Colin Bridgerton, Anthony Bridgerton’s brother. Because not only did she make a “brave” but failed attempt to socially ruin both her so-called “best friend” Eloise [sister to Colin and Anthony] [4] and her cousin Marina Thompson [whom Colin passionately loved][5] , but Colin himself had always declared that Penelope [Pen, as he always called her] was merely a friend, without any romantic feelings.
The fact that Colin marries her in Season 3 anyway—even though at the start of Season 3 he claimed under oath that he would ruin the woman who had tried to ruin his sister and his former lover Marina, and was downright furious upon the revelation that Pen was Lady Whistledown—is illogical and, from a psychological standpoint, absolute nonsense, making it one of the biggest blunders by the show’s creators.
This can only be explained by Penelope’s intense manipulative tricks, with which she likely [and you see this in Season 3 as well] played the victim in Colin’s presence to arouse his pity and sympathy.
As proof of this, I cite a scene in which Pen asks Colin to kiss her so that she does not go to her grave without ever having been touched by a man…
She did this throughout Season 3, and it only worked because Colin was, at his core, a chivalrous man.
I am on my hobbyhorse now, so I will keep going for a bit:
LADY VIOLET
Still, I can understand that Pen tried to make her move with Colin [after all, she had been in love with him for half her life, and the chances of her getting married were not exactly massive].
But the fact that Lady Violet accepted her and supported that marriage feels almost like a betrayal. After all, she KNEW that Pen had tried to socially ruin her daughter Eloise [as it had been published out in the open in Lady Whistledown, and she read that paper eagerly]. That is the worst betrayal against your own child.
But that does not really surprise me coming from a mother who not only dehumanized her own son’s lover [Siena Rosso, by contemptuously calling her “a certain soprano,” knowing full well that she was deeply hurting Anthony by doing so][6] , but also nastily sabotaged his love affair with Siena Rosso by emotionally blackmailing him with his deceased father. [7] Something through which she caused a permanent estrangement between herself and her eldest son.[8]
Objecting to a romantic relationship out of fear of social death is one thing. Dehumanizing someone, emotionally blackmailing your son, and breaking his heart in the process is unforgivable.[9]
AND THEN:
Applauding a marriage between Penelope and Colin [naturally because of her “status” as Lady Whistledown], while that very same Penelope tried to socially ruin your daughter, yet dehumanizing the woman who only loved your son but came from the “wrong” class and circles [10], is incomprehensible to me.
THAT WAS MY COMMENTARY AGAIN
UNTIL NEXT TIME / HAHAHA
ASTRID ESSED
NOTES
NOTE 1A
NOTES 1 T/M 10

Reacties uitgeschakeld voor Bridgerton/About Penelope Featherington, alias Lady Whistledown/About Pain, Cruelty, Manipulation and a Mother’s Betrayal

Opgeslagen onder Divers

NOTES 1 T/M 10

[1]
[2]
[3]
[4]
[5]
[6]
ANTHONY’S REACTION ON ”A CERTAIN SOPRANO\”
Chronological Scene Analysis
1. The Blow and the Sudden Silence (The Physical Impact)
Prior to his mother’s remark, Anthony is still speaking in a smug, lackadaisical manner about her criticism of his behavior toward Daphne’s marriage candidates. However, his previously relaxed, arrogant, and haughty posture behind his desk vanishes in an instant. When Violet delivers that devastating blow with her remark about “a certain soprano,” Anthony offers absolutely no verbal reply. He does not address it with a single word.
The very moment Violet utters the word “soprano,” he falls completely silent, and you can see the blow reverberate physically through his body. The shock is written all over his face. An acute, physical reaction registers across Anthony’s face: his jaw muscles immediately clench so tightly that a hard line carves along his jawline. His neck muscles tighten, his entire body stiffens, and he swallows hard — as if literally gasping for air after a physical blow to the stomach. He does not yell, nor does he attempt to defend himself; instead, he forces himself to swallow the blow to suppress his rising fury and intense pain. This betrays that Violet’s devaluation of the woman he loves strikes him at the very core of his being.
2. The Wounded, Icy Gaze (The Barrier)
Instead of exploding — which is what he innermost desires — his eyes stiffen into two icy, piercing points. His eyes, which just moments ago were fiercely and arrogantly arguing about Daphne, suddenly turn cold, wounded, and deathly still. It is the exact moment he realizes that his mother not only knows his deepest secret, but has just thrown it onto the table as a sordid social scandal.
He slightly narrows his eyes and glares at Violet directly, unwavering and with an intense, wounded pride. He looks her straight in the eye with a cold, deeply wounded gaze, utterly steeped in resentment. At that exact moment, not a single trace of the gentle, young son remains in his eyes. It is the look of a son who feels betrayed on the most intimate level possible, yet resolutely refuses to grant her the satisfaction of an emotional outburst. It is a look that says: ‘You have just crossed a boundary that you may never cross again.’
3. The Tremor of Failed Indifference
Anthony desperately tries to feign a countenance of total, noble impassiveness, as if Violet’s sneer leaves him entirely cold. However, the camera is too close, and the micro-expressions betray his true state:
  • The Nostrils: His nostrils flare slightly and fervently — a direct biological manifestation of suppressed, seething rage.
  • The Mouth: His lips thin, drawing into a bitter, taut line. There is a highly subtle, almost invisible tremor in his lower lip, which he instantly corrects by clenching his jaw even harder.
 
https://www.google.com/search?q=The+exact+moment+the+words+%22a+certain+soprano%22+fall%2C+an+acute%2C+physical+reaction+registers+across+Anthony%27s+face.+His+jaw+muscles+immediately+clench+so+tightly+that+a+hard+line+carves+along+his+jawline.+His+neck+muscles+tighten%2C+and+he+swallows+hard%2C+as+if+literally+gasping+for+air+after+a+physical+blow+to+the+stomach%2FNederlandse+vertaling&sca_esv=64b268b11d0571a2&sxsrf=APpeQnt39rR4VRHvE5gN4B6vl4p-A96AvQ%3A1786367672921&ei=uM55aobiN9-L9u8P8ZSu-AQ&biw=1280&bih=585&uact=5&sclient=gws-wiz-serp&udm=50&fbs=ABfTbFUyxjQn9bne4DuflY2dNqqKbvlIcC736Ld1YUW461EyncF1Mcd5iH2qherpY2KMOHKpz419JjEcVPoS6mwPRP8hmT-9cnzTcaY-hw8FlYWaTjWsKenKn9njqy2TKMd9RPc2QziU15PEjPgrT2l-0Inl2ZzWfIlWPU7RqmCaJ5ZaUjOxG1U-f05Njy5fcA5qHAkek2bN&aep=10&ntc=1&mstk=AUtExfB_fDs5JzEXd1Voe2xRAwFA2gFx7b0QrUGD1NZl4WunEo9aSdHnMaWwOPy-WJLZ7UVnj7UEfnjXc679XyYskVf34u8KADkLOMUE3v2X6KdX2-dNyHvAw2QCXm8hpesWW4dBW1ZewC32ae86iJGev2NX1OZOVPlovpwVCbODWyxxrdSUPjuvOj48HvzTgCDMklQAv1c5-ekRkeRR-GKK42vVkqrRz3svRfglGWupfZTeCSqilvVzPhZi33vC7k-gO9tDq72H7aCoEuUq1_a8-cd2zOiYZmh6DYL0havtW_c8s3cq2E7bb0WhjvgVJUjCsP7cT-_ZJyp_0DI1hYy1YviWJncfmUzAiA&aioh=3&csuir=1&cs=0&atvm=2&mtid=79B5auUPkNSL6A-mhfPxCA
At some point she must have seen the hurt expression on her son’s face, but she turned a blind eye to it, even when she could have known that his ”Affair” was far more than an ”infatuation” [45]
And besides:
At some point it is of no importance anymore, whether your intentions
are good or bad.
Inflicting severe pain on someone is still inflicting severe pain, whatever the intentions
[7]
  • The Comparison to Edmund: By bringing up his late father (“Your father would never…”), Violet used Anthony’s greatest trauma as a weapon to force him to give up Siena.”
 
[8]
[9]
[10]

Reacties uitgeschakeld voor NOTES 1 T/M 10

Opgeslagen onder Divers

NOTE 1A

1A
ABOUT PENELOPE FEATHERINGTON, ALIAS LADY WHISTLEDOWN
Let us be entirely clear about why Penelope deserves the title of “Penelope the Malicious” (Penelope de Kwaaie, Kwaaie is a Dutch Word for Malicious).
To look at her character with true psychological insight means recognizing her pain. We can all understand her suffering: being treated abominably by her own mother and sisters, being relentlessly ignored on the sidelines of every ball, and left to feel entirely invisible. Under such crushing circumstances, engaging in a bit of retaliatory gossip to carve out a sliver of power is something one might still understand—and perhaps even forgive.
But Penelope crosses an unforgivable moral line. Her actions cease to be a defense mechanism and transform into outright malice when she targets those closest to her.
First, there is her calculated attack on her cousin, Marina Thompson. Instead of finding a human, private way to handle the situation, she uses the massive megaphone of her scandal sheet to publicly humiliate and expose her.
Even worse is her betrayal of Eloise—her absolute best friend, the person she supposedly loved most. To save her own skin and protect her secret identity as Whistledown, Penelope does not hesitate to throw Eloise to the wolves.
Both of these young women could have been permanently, socially ruined by Penelope’s pen. Their entire futures were placed on the chopping block. That is not the behavior of a helpless victim; that is the execution of a cold, highly destructive power trip. Her trauma may explain her motives, but it absolutely cannot justify her cruelty.
https://www.google.com/search?q=He+could+hardly+write+down+%22dresses+for+Siena%22+in+the+official+ledger.+Instead%2C+he+simply+noted+the+names+of+the+exclusive+French+fashion+houses+or+shops+on+Bond+Street+where+he+settled+the+bills%2C+or+booked+it+under+a+general+entry+for+textiles+and+attire.%2FNederlandse+vertaling&sca_esv=3a75f9ad15a7c092&sxsrf=APpeQnsPu5rgjVTtweyOVBKBccR1pE-Qwg%3A1787003238298&ei=TIGDatrbMMKni-gP0_-0sQc&iflsig=ABILxe8AAAAAaoOPXK0qvt0Pq1uCp6I2oD1KpPnyiaWu&uact=5&sclient=gws-wiz&fbs=ABfTbFUyxjQn9bne4DuflY2dNqqKbvlIcC736Ld1YUW461Eync997olHw4iGJeJyp_B6AzQfOSm2QqMfcEtTAd0xitwlL75WL5-rJ1AhhihAZYTKCBnH7waDUIEX5NMGycAG6w3_9-AxX238ZF105GuqV4Z5MCyPIUCp1js9i-76FHILlhXSK9MbuwbxuvCkT7I15QlXW8jU&aep=10&ntc=1&mstk=AUtExfDx8DLf1s_Q4cnko_lMi-EJEZfpM_kVYFLiGJ2GkIIfbONhz7yhZR1ATbke7o7YnYzfcKCDv8GF0EqZkKesnbUVyQVKDT5faqJ_0TxcHnPkk5dRU0yS3bStqqXTHng2T63uOI5-OMB6vftL10x-s5IEniAaH50RIvzc9l__1cGzGgIbF4dVa-sTdofskDkpqwdwfQ_yErI4KvyKsLHy7Fiik1dh_qg_xReqYZtp8bLaz-IJ10Y5X5h0xI-P_vF2GV7sGsil3_f7Iw&aioh=3&csuir=1&cs=0&atvm=2&mtid=6MaDaq_zGtSdi-gP3PWMsQc&sec_src=gmail&lns_mode=cvst&elids=CKjG5cqf86D7ngEQARgBIhDqS4mJlmiuQi0Bs_1L-zIvOID4hrO4q5YDSAFQAmoA%2CCO-0vOjL2eGBrgEQARgBIhBS0D2bbpeNVc6rRx-ZlpuIOLCi6f63q5YDSAFQAmoA%2CCNTo35Sfs4mmvQEQARgBIhC4KM3dkG_rIBbh8wfjlVBlOIDruq65q5YDSAFQAmoA%2CCKn-vYbkwb2dvAEQARgBIhCHsXGBCif_Kg6ofopLH0uKOPC52di5q5YDSAFQAmoA%2CCKvxttTCj4fsmwEQARgBIhC31F3CuN4kIWJE0cMmHqqGONiXr7i8q5YDSAFQAmoA&udm=50

Reacties uitgeschakeld voor NOTE 1A

Opgeslagen onder Divers