Maandelijks archief: augustus 2026

NOOT 6/WEER NOS TELETEKST

[6]
BTSELEM
E1 NOT ISRAELI TERRITORY
Miriam Leedor, director of public outreach at B’Tselem , in an Op-ed originally published by Ynetnews website: According to int’l law, ‘state-owned’ lands in West Bank can be used only for the benefit of the local Palestinian population Miriam Leedor
 

The controversy surrounding the government’s decision to promote the construction of thousands of housing units in the E1 zone, which will connect Ma’ale Adumim and Jerusalem and cut through the West Bank, is view by pundits and politicians alike as a serious diplomatic problem, but not a legal one.

It is assumed that most of the area has been declared as state-owned land, meaning it belongs to the government, which can do whatever it wants with it. This assumption is completely false. Over the years Israel’s governments have allotted “state-owned” lands in the West Bank almost exclusively for the use of settlements, in direct violation of international law.

As of today, 1.4 million dunams (346,000 acres) in the West Bank (some 26% of the entire territory) are defined as state-owned land. Some 527,000 of the dunams (130,000 acres), mainly in the Jordan Valley, were considered state-owned land when Jordan ruled over the region. Since the High Court of Justice ruled in 1979 that it is illegal to build settlements on private Palestinian land, the settlement enterprise has been based on the use of state-owned lands. To this end, between 1979 and 2002 Israel has declared more than 900,000 dunams (about 222,000 acres) as state-owned land, an addition of some 170%. Most of these lands were defined as being within the limits of the settlements’ local or regional councils.

According to international law, publicly-owned areas in the West Bank also belong to the Palestinian population that resides within them. The West Bank was never annexed to Israel’s sovereign territory (such a unilateral annexation would be illegal); it is under Israeli military rule. Military rule means that the state holds the territory only as a trustee.

International law clearly determines that Israel can use the territory only to provide for the needs of the local population or to serve its military and security-related needs. Building permanent communities that are populated by Israeli civilians, the advancement of Israeli industrial and tourism projects, exploiting the area’s resources (including water) – all of these are forbidden. These resources must be used to serve the needs of the Palestinian population alone.

Despite the legal restrictions, since taking over the West Bank Israel has classified hundreds of thousands of dunams as state-owned land. These areas were robbed from the Palestinian population and are used almost exclusively by the settlements, which were established illegally. Classifying these areas as “state-owned” and transferring them to the settlements has had severe effects on the local Palestinian population: The livelihood of the shepherds and farmers has been taken away; Palestinian communities cannot expand and develop; and lands that were supposed to be designated for the development of Palestinian industry, tourism and agriculture have been robbed.

It is not just settlement building that is wrong. As strange as this may sound to Israelis, who consider natural resources to be Israeli property, we are not allowed to open beaches and factories in the northern Dead Sea; we are not allowed to develop tourism projects in areas we do not own and we are forbidden from exploiting the resources of the conquered land. These resources can only be used for the benefit of the local Palestinian population.

The government’s policy is not new, but the fact that we have been acting this way for decades does not make it right. “State-owned” lands are meant for the use of the Palestinians. The only exception that allows Israel to use conquered lands is when these lands are needed in order to meet a military need. The plan to build thousands of settler homes in E1 has nothing to do with Israel’s military needs.

Reacties uitgeschakeld voor NOOT 6/WEER NOS TELETEKST

Opgeslagen onder Divers

NOOT 7/WEER NOS TELETEKST

[7]
E1 (short for “East 1”; Hebrewמְבַשֶּׂרֶת אֲדֻמִּיםromanizedMevaseret Adumimlit.‘Herald of Adumim’), also called the E1 areaE1 zone or E1 corridor, is an area of the Israeli-occupied West Bank within the municipal boundary of the Israeli settlement[1] of Ma’ale Adumim.”
WIKIPEDIA
E1 (WEST BANK)
Ma’ale Adumim (Hebrewמַעֲלֵה אֲדֻמִּיםArabicمعالي أدوميم) is an urban Israeli settlement organized as a city council in the West Bank, seven kilometers (4

+1⁄2 miles) east of Jerusalem.”

WIKIPEDIA
MA’ALE ADUMIN

Reacties uitgeschakeld voor NOOT 7/WEER NOS TELETEKST

Opgeslagen onder Divers

NOOT 8/WEER NOS TELETEKST

[8]
Ma’ale Adumim (Hebrewמַעֲלֵה אֲדֻמִּיםArabicمعالي أدوميم) is an urban Israeli settlement organized as a city council in the West Bank, seven kilometers (4

+1⁄2 miles) east of Jerusalem.”

WIKIPEDIA
MA’ALE ADUMIN

Reacties uitgeschakeld voor NOOT 8/WEER NOS TELETEKST

Opgeslagen onder Divers

NOTEN 9 T/M 11/WEER NOS TELETEKST

[9]
[10]
[11]

ARTICLE 49, FOURTH GENEVA CONVENTION

The Occupying Power shall not deport or transfer parts of its own civilian population into the territory it occupies.

ARTICLE 49, FOURTH GENEVA CONVENTION

https://ihl-databases.icrc.org/en/ihl-treaties/gciv-1949/article-49?activeTab=

ARTICLE 55, THE HAGUE CONVENTION, 1907

The occupying State shall be regarded only as administrator and usufructuary of public buildings, real estate, forests, and agricultural estates belonging to the hostile State, and situated in the occupied country. It must safeguard the capital of these properties, and administer them in accordance with the rules of usufruct.

https://ihl-databases.icrc.org/en/ihl-treaties/hague-conv-iv-1907/regulations-art-55?activeTab=

SEE ALSO

https://www.astridessed.nl/about-the-illegal-character-of-settlements-in-occupied-territories/

Reacties uitgeschakeld voor NOTEN 9 T/M 11/WEER NOS TELETEKST

Opgeslagen onder Divers

NOOT 12/WEER NOS TELETEKST

[12]
”International law is clear that Israeli settlements in the West Bank are illegal.”
JOINT STATEMENT ON ISRAELI GOVERNMENT’S DECISION TO PUBLIC CONSTRUCTION TENDERS FOR THE E1 SETTLEMENT PROJECT
20 AUGUST 2026

Statement by the leaders of Canada, France, Germany, Italy, Netherlands, Norway, and the United Kingdom on the Israeli Government’s decision to publish construction tenders for the E1 settlement project.

“The Israeli Government’s decision to publish construction tenders for the E1 settlement project is unacceptable. The international community has long opposed this settlement expansion, and has voiced their grave concerns privately and publicly. The E1 settlement will undermine the prospect of the two-state solution by driving a wedge through the West Bank and harming the territorial contiguity of the Palestinian Territories.

International law is clear that Israeli settlements in the West Bank are illegal. This is the position of the international community reaffirmed by the United Nations Security Council.

At a time of grave instability in the West Bank with unprecedented levels of violence by settlers against civilians, and serious restrictions on the Palestinian economy, this decision is even more concerning.

We urge the Government of Israel to retract these plans immediately and end its expansion of settlements in the West Bank. Not only will they take us further from peace, but they further undermine Israel’s international standing.

Businesses should not consider bidding for construction tenders. They should be aware of legal and reputational consequences including the risk of involving themselves in serious breaches of international law.

We reiterate our commitment to a comprehensive, just and lasting peace based on the two-state solution. We will continue to act in its interest.

Reacties uitgeschakeld voor NOOT 12/WEER NOS TELETEKST

Opgeslagen onder Divers

NOTEN 13 EN 14/WEER NOS TELETEKST

[14]
The Gaza Strip remains occupied even after the withdrawal of Israeli forces and removal of settlers in 2005 as Israel has retained effective control over the territory and its population, including through its control of its borders, territorial waters, air space, and population registry.
AMNESTY INTERNATIONAL

Israel must end its occupation of Palestine to stop fuelling apartheid and systematic human rights violations

19 FEBRUARY 2024

Israel must end its brutal occupation of Gaza and the West Bank, including East Jerusalem, which it has maintained since 1967, said Amnesty International, as public hearings begin at the International Court of Justice (ICJ) to examine the legal consequences of Israel’s prolonged occupation.

The public hearings are taking place in the Hague from 19 to 26 February after the UN General Assembly adopted a resolution in December 2022 to request an advisory opinion from the ICJ on the legality of Israel’s policies and practices in the Occupied Palestinian Territories (OPT) and the consequences of Israel’s conduct for other states and the UN. More than 50 states, the African Union, the Arab League and Organisation of Islamic Cooperation are scheduled to participate in the proceedings.

The world must recognize that ending Israel’s illegal occupation is a prerequisite to stopping the recurrent human rights violations in Israel and the OPT.

Agnès Callamard, Amnesty International’s Secretary General

“Israel’s occupation of Palestine is the longest and one of the most deadly military occupations in the world. For decades it has been characterised by widespread and systematic human rights violations against Palestinians. The occupation has also enabled and entrenched Israel’s system of apartheid imposed on Palestinians,” said Agnès Callamard, Amnesty International’s Secretary General.

“Over the years, Israel’s military occupation has evolved into a perpetual occupation in flagrant violation of international law.

“The current conflict raging in the occupied Gaza Strip, where the ICJ has ruled there is a real and imminent risk of genocide, has brought into sharp focus the catastrophic consequences of allowing Israel’s international crimes in the OPT to continue with impunity for so long. The world must recognize that ending Israel’s illegal occupation is a prerequisite to stopping the recurrent human rights violations in Israel and the OPT.”

‘Perpetual’ occupation

Under international humanitarian law, occupation of a territory during a conflict is meant to be temporary. The occupying power is required to administer the territory in the interest of the occupied population and to preserve as much as possible the situation that existed at the beginning of the occupation, including by respecting existing laws and refraining from introducing demographic changes and tampering with the territorial integrity of the occupied territory.

Israel’s occupation has failed to align with these basic principles of international humanitarian law. The duration of Israel’s occupation – spanning more than half a century – coupled with the authorities’ illegal official annexation of occupied East Jerusalem and de facto annexation of large swathes of the West Bank through land confiscation and settlement expansion, provide clear evidence that Israel’s intention is for the occupation to be permanent and for the benefit of the occupying power and its own citizens.

The Gaza Strip remains occupied even after the withdrawal of Israeli forces and removal of settlers in 2005 as Israel has retained effective control over the territory and its population, including through its control of its borders, territorial waters, air space, and population registry. For 16 years, the occupation has been experienced in Gaza through Israel’s illegal blockade that has severely restricted movement of people and goods and has devastated Gaza’s economy, and through repeated episodes of hostilities that have killed and injured thousands of civilians and destroyed much of Gaza’s infrastructure and housing.

“All states must review their relations with Israel to ensure that they are not contributing to sustaining the occupation or the system of apartheid. As European foreign ministers gather in Brussels today, the need to make a clear and united call for an end to Israel’s occupation has never been more urgent,” said Agnès Callamard.

Life under occupation

Palestinians living under Israeli occupation are subjected to a myriad of human rights violations, maintained by an institutionalized regime of systematic domination and oppression. The discriminatory and repressive laws, ostensibly adopted as part of the occupation but effectively serving the objectives of the Israel’s system of apartheid, have fragmented and segregated Palestinians across the OPT, while unlawfully exploiting their resources, arbitrarily restricting their rights and freedoms and controlling almost every aspect of their lives.

Even before the latest hostilities, Palestinians in Gaza had been subjected to numerous Israeli military offensives – at least six between 2008 and 2023 – in addition to an enduring land, air, and sea blockade, which has helped maintain Israel’s effective control and occupation of Gaza. During those offensives, Amnesty International documented a recurrent pattern of unlawful attacks, amounting to war crimes and even crimes against humanity, while the enduring blockade constitutes collective punishment, also a war crime.

For 56 years Palestinians in the OPT have been living trapped and oppressed under Israel’s brutal occupation, subjected to systemic discrimination.

Agnès Callamard, Amnesty International’s Secretary General

In the West Bank, including occupied East Jerusalem, Palestinians routinely face excessive use of force, unlawful killings, arbitrary arrest, administrative detention, forced displacement, home demolitions, confiscation of land and natural resources, and denial of fundamental rights and freedoms. Israel’s multi-layered closure system, fortified by mass surveillance, physical barriers and legal restrictions, including an illegal wall/fence, hundreds of checkpoints and roadblocks, and an arbitrary permit regime, has curtailed Palestinians’ freedom of movement and perpetuated their disenfranchisement.

Among the most emblematic examples of Israel’s outright disregard for international law has been the establishment and incessant spread of Israeli settlements throughout the OPT and the illegal annexation of occupied East Jerusalem immediately after the 1967 war which was constitutionally enshrined in 1980. There are currently at least 300 illegal Israeli settlements and outposts in the West Bank, including in occupied East Jerusalem, with a population of over 700,000 Israeli settlers.

“For 56 years Palestinians in the OPT have been living trapped and oppressed under Israel’s brutal occupation, subjected to systemic discrimination. Every aspect of their daily lives is disrupted and controlled by Israeli authorities, who place restrictions on their rights to move around, earn a living, pursue educational and professional aspirations, and enjoy a decent quality of life, as well as depriving them of access to their land and natural resources,” said Agnès Callamard.

“Israel has also continued its vicious land grab policies relentlessly expanding illegal settlements in violation of international law with devastating consequences for Palestinians’ human rights and security. Violent Israeli settlers have been attacking Palestinians for decades with virtually total impunity.”

A draconian system of control

Israel’s draconian system of control over the OPT includes a large network of military checkpoints, fences/ walls and military bases and patrols as well as a string of repressive military orders.

Israel’s control of the OPT’s borders, the population registry, the supply of water, electricity, telecommunication services, humanitarian and development assistance, and the imposition of its currency have had devastating effects on the economic and social developments of the Palestinian people in the OPT.

This control has reached unprecedented levels of cruelty in the Gaza Strip where Israel has maintained a 16-year illegal blockade which has been further tightened since 9 October 2023. The blockade, coupled with Israel’s recurrent military operations have plunged the Gaza Strip into one of the gravest humanitarian and human rights crisis of modern times.

“As the occupying power Israel has an obligation to ensure the protection and welfare of all those residing in the territory it controls. Instead, it has perpetrated gross and systematic human rights violations with impunity. Israel cites the need to maintain security as the reason for its cruel policies. But security can never justify apartheid, illegal annexation and settlements, or war crimes against the protected population. The only way to ensure security for Israelis and Palestinians is to uphold human rights for all,” said Agnès Callamard.

Ending the occupation would mean restoring Palestinians’ rights by lifting the brutal blockade on Gaza, dismantling Israeli settlements in the West Bank, including East Jerusalem and reversing its illegal annexation. It would allow Palestinians to move freely in the areas where they live and allow families separated by different identification legal statuses – such as the Jerusalem residency and West Bank or Gaza Strip – to be reunited. It would alleviate mass suffering and end widescale human rights violations.

It would also contribute to tackling one of the root causes of the recurrent violence and war crimes against Israelis, thus helping to improve human rights protection and secure justice and reparation for victims on all sides.

Background

On 30 December 2022, the UN General Assembly adopted resolution A/RES/77/247, in which, it requested the International Court of Justice for an advisory opinion on key questions regarding the legal consequences arising from its prolonged occupation, and settlement and annexation of the Palestinian territory occupied since 1967, how the policies and practices of Israel affect the legal status of the occupation and what legal consequences arise for all states and the UN from this status.

The Court is expected to issue its advisory opinion later this year.

For six decades, Amnesty International has been documenting how Israeli forces have committed grave human rights violations in the OPT with impunity.  In 2022, the organization issued Israel’s apartheid against Palestinians: Cruel system of domination and crime against humanity, a report which highlights the entrenched role that Israel’s military and its occupation have had in perpetuating the system of apartheid. Many of the report’s findings and recommendations underline the urgent need for an end to Israel’s occupation to remove the environment that enables the commission of crimes against humanity and war crimes.

END

Reacties uitgeschakeld voor NOTEN 13 EN 14/WEER NOS TELETEKST

Opgeslagen onder Divers

Bridgerton/About Penelope Featherington, alias Lady Whistledown/About Pain, Cruelty, Manipulation and a Mother’s Betrayal

Penelope Bridgerton | Bridgerton Wiki | Fandom
PENELOPE FEATHERINGTON ALIAS LADY WHISTLEDOWN

ABOUT PENELOPE FEATHERINGTON, ALIAS LADY WHISTLEDOWN/ABOUT PAIN, CRUELTY, MANIPULATION AND A MOTHER’S BETRAYAL

HALLO FOLKS
IN ADVANCE
ADDITION
LET US MAKE THIS CRYSTAL CLEAR FROM THE BEGINNIG
OF COURSE I understand Penelope Feathering’s pain, being treated badly by her mother and sisters and being laughed at on balls and for that I do sympathise with her, but what is a Red Line for me is NOT that she started a rather spicy gossip sheet [I can understand her need for revenge on people who treated her badly] but that she went too far and became utterly malicious, trying to ruin her best friend Eloise and her cousin Marina, who was friendly to her [the fact that Colin loved Marina and not Pen is no excuse for ruin her, at most to play a trick on her……] [IA]
LET’S GO!
Here is your dedicated Bridgerton Fan again, who already wrote a lot about the series! [1]
Although I am writing about a complete different subject in the Bridgerton Series at the moment, namely about the Anthony Bridgeron and Siena Rosso Love Relationship [2] I simply couldn’t resist the temptation to give you my first commentary on Penelope Featherington, alias Lady Whistledown [3]
 I will write a lot more about this lady in the future !
MY FIRST, SHORT COMMENT ABOUT THIS LADY
And as I wrote above in my article:
LET US MAKE THIS CRYSTAL CLEAR FROM THE BEGINNIG
OF COURSE I understand Penelope Feathering’s pain, being treated badly by her mother and sisters and being laughed at on balls and for that I do sympathise with her, but what is a Red Line for me is not that she started a rather spicy gossip sheet [I can understand her need for revenge on people who treated her badly] but that she went too far and became utterly malicious, trying to ruin her best friend Eloise and her cousin Marina, who was friendly to her [the fact that Colin loved Marina and not Pen is no excuse for ruin her, at most to play a trick on her……]
AGAIN:
NO EXCUSE WHATSOEVER FOR TRYING TO  RUIN A PERSON’S COMPLETELY
THERE I DRAW THE RED LINE!
MORE ABOUT LA PENELOPE/HAHA
Lady Whistledown turned out to be Pen Featherington, who, for reasons incomprehensible to fans, managed to become the wife of Colin Bridgerton, Anthony Bridgerton’s brother. Because not only did she make a “brave” but failed attempt to socially ruin both her so-called “best friend” Eloise [sister to Colin and Anthony] [4] and her cousin Marina Thompson [whom Colin passionately loved][5] , but Colin himself had always declared that Penelope [Pen, as he always called her] was merely a friend, without any romantic feelings.
The fact that Colin marries her in Season 3 anyway—even though at the start of Season 3 he claimed under oath that he would ruin the woman who had tried to ruin his sister and his former lover Marina, and was downright furious upon the revelation that Pen was Lady Whistledown—is illogical and, from a psychological standpoint, absolute nonsense, making it one of the biggest blunders by the show’s creators.
This can only be explained by Penelope’s intense manipulative tricks, with which she likely [and you see this in Season 3 as well] played the victim in Colin’s presence to arouse his pity and sympathy.
As proof of this, I cite a scene in which Pen asks Colin to kiss her so that she does not go to her grave without ever having been touched by a man…
She did this throughout Season 3, and it only worked because Colin was, at his core, a chivalrous man.
I am on my hobbyhorse now, so I will keep going for a bit:
LADY VIOLET
Still, I can understand that Pen tried to make her move with Colin [after all, she had been in love with him for half her life, and the chances of her getting married were not exactly massive].
But the fact that Lady Violet accepted her and supported that marriage feels almost like a betrayal. After all, she KNEW that Pen had tried to socially ruin her daughter Eloise [as it had been published out in the open in Lady Whistledown, and she read that paper eagerly]. That is the worst betrayal against your own child.
But that does not really surprise me coming from a mother who not only dehumanized her own son’s lover [Siena Rosso, by contemptuously calling her “a certain soprano,” knowing full well that she was deeply hurting Anthony by doing so][6] , but also nastily sabotaged his love affair with Siena Rosso by emotionally blackmailing him with his deceased father. [7] Something through which she caused a permanent estrangement between herself and her eldest son.[8]
Objecting to a romantic relationship out of fear of social death is one thing. Dehumanizing someone, emotionally blackmailing your son, and breaking his heart in the process is unforgivable.[9]
AND THEN:
Applauding a marriage between Penelope and Colin [naturally because of her “status” as Lady Whistledown], while that very same Penelope tried to socially ruin your daughter, yet dehumanizing the woman who only loved your son but came from the “wrong” class and circles [10], is incomprehensible to me.
THAT WAS MY COMMENTARY AGAIN
UNTIL NEXT TIME / HAHAHA
ASTRID ESSED
NOTES
NOTE 1A
NOTES 1 T/M 10

Reacties uitgeschakeld voor Bridgerton/About Penelope Featherington, alias Lady Whistledown/About Pain, Cruelty, Manipulation and a Mother’s Betrayal

Opgeslagen onder Divers

NOTES 1 T/M 10

[1]
[2]
[3]
[4]
[5]
[6]
ANTHONY’S REACTION ON ”A CERTAIN SOPRANO\”
Chronological Scene Analysis
1. The Blow and the Sudden Silence (The Physical Impact)
Prior to his mother’s remark, Anthony is still speaking in a smug, lackadaisical manner about her criticism of his behavior toward Daphne’s marriage candidates. However, his previously relaxed, arrogant, and haughty posture behind his desk vanishes in an instant. When Violet delivers that devastating blow with her remark about “a certain soprano,” Anthony offers absolutely no verbal reply. He does not address it with a single word.
The very moment Violet utters the word “soprano,” he falls completely silent, and you can see the blow reverberate physically through his body. The shock is written all over his face. An acute, physical reaction registers across Anthony’s face: his jaw muscles immediately clench so tightly that a hard line carves along his jawline. His neck muscles tighten, his entire body stiffens, and he swallows hard — as if literally gasping for air after a physical blow to the stomach. He does not yell, nor does he attempt to defend himself; instead, he forces himself to swallow the blow to suppress his rising fury and intense pain. This betrays that Violet’s devaluation of the woman he loves strikes him at the very core of his being.
2. The Wounded, Icy Gaze (The Barrier)
Instead of exploding — which is what he innermost desires — his eyes stiffen into two icy, piercing points. His eyes, which just moments ago were fiercely and arrogantly arguing about Daphne, suddenly turn cold, wounded, and deathly still. It is the exact moment he realizes that his mother not only knows his deepest secret, but has just thrown it onto the table as a sordid social scandal.
He slightly narrows his eyes and glares at Violet directly, unwavering and with an intense, wounded pride. He looks her straight in the eye with a cold, deeply wounded gaze, utterly steeped in resentment. At that exact moment, not a single trace of the gentle, young son remains in his eyes. It is the look of a son who feels betrayed on the most intimate level possible, yet resolutely refuses to grant her the satisfaction of an emotional outburst. It is a look that says: ‘You have just crossed a boundary that you may never cross again.’
3. The Tremor of Failed Indifference
Anthony desperately tries to feign a countenance of total, noble impassiveness, as if Violet’s sneer leaves him entirely cold. However, the camera is too close, and the micro-expressions betray his true state:
  • The Nostrils: His nostrils flare slightly and fervently — a direct biological manifestation of suppressed, seething rage.
  • The Mouth: His lips thin, drawing into a bitter, taut line. There is a highly subtle, almost invisible tremor in his lower lip, which he instantly corrects by clenching his jaw even harder.
 
https://www.google.com/search?q=The+exact+moment+the+words+%22a+certain+soprano%22+fall%2C+an+acute%2C+physical+reaction+registers+across+Anthony%27s+face.+His+jaw+muscles+immediately+clench+so+tightly+that+a+hard+line+carves+along+his+jawline.+His+neck+muscles+tighten%2C+and+he+swallows+hard%2C+as+if+literally+gasping+for+air+after+a+physical+blow+to+the+stomach%2FNederlandse+vertaling&sca_esv=64b268b11d0571a2&sxsrf=APpeQnt39rR4VRHvE5gN4B6vl4p-A96AvQ%3A1786367672921&ei=uM55aobiN9-L9u8P8ZSu-AQ&biw=1280&bih=585&uact=5&sclient=gws-wiz-serp&udm=50&fbs=ABfTbFUyxjQn9bne4DuflY2dNqqKbvlIcC736Ld1YUW461EyncF1Mcd5iH2qherpY2KMOHKpz419JjEcVPoS6mwPRP8hmT-9cnzTcaY-hw8FlYWaTjWsKenKn9njqy2TKMd9RPc2QziU15PEjPgrT2l-0Inl2ZzWfIlWPU7RqmCaJ5ZaUjOxG1U-f05Njy5fcA5qHAkek2bN&aep=10&ntc=1&mstk=AUtExfB_fDs5JzEXd1Voe2xRAwFA2gFx7b0QrUGD1NZl4WunEo9aSdHnMaWwOPy-WJLZ7UVnj7UEfnjXc679XyYskVf34u8KADkLOMUE3v2X6KdX2-dNyHvAw2QCXm8hpesWW4dBW1ZewC32ae86iJGev2NX1OZOVPlovpwVCbODWyxxrdSUPjuvOj48HvzTgCDMklQAv1c5-ekRkeRR-GKK42vVkqrRz3svRfglGWupfZTeCSqilvVzPhZi33vC7k-gO9tDq72H7aCoEuUq1_a8-cd2zOiYZmh6DYL0havtW_c8s3cq2E7bb0WhjvgVJUjCsP7cT-_ZJyp_0DI1hYy1YviWJncfmUzAiA&aioh=3&csuir=1&cs=0&atvm=2&mtid=79B5auUPkNSL6A-mhfPxCA
At some point she must have seen the hurt expression on her son’s face, but she turned a blind eye to it, even when she could have known that his ”Affair” was far more than an ”infatuation” [45]
And besides:
At some point it is of no importance anymore, whether your intentions
are good or bad.
Inflicting severe pain on someone is still inflicting severe pain, whatever the intentions
[7]
  • The Comparison to Edmund: By bringing up his late father (“Your father would never…”), Violet used Anthony’s greatest trauma as a weapon to force him to give up Siena.”
 
[8]
[9]
[10]

Reacties uitgeschakeld voor NOTES 1 T/M 10

Opgeslagen onder Divers

NOTE 1A

1A
ABOUT PENELOPE FEATHERINGTON, ALIAS LADY WHISTLEDOWN
Let us be entirely clear about why Penelope deserves the title of “Penelope the Malicious” (Penelope de Kwaaie, Kwaaie is a Dutch Word for Malicious).
To look at her character with true psychological insight means recognizing her pain. We can all understand her suffering: being treated abominably by her own mother and sisters, being relentlessly ignored on the sidelines of every ball, and left to feel entirely invisible. Under such crushing circumstances, engaging in a bit of retaliatory gossip to carve out a sliver of power is something one might still understand—and perhaps even forgive.
But Penelope crosses an unforgivable moral line. Her actions cease to be a defense mechanism and transform into outright malice when she targets those closest to her.
First, there is her calculated attack on her cousin, Marina Thompson. Instead of finding a human, private way to handle the situation, she uses the massive megaphone of her scandal sheet to publicly humiliate and expose her.
Even worse is her betrayal of Eloise—her absolute best friend, the person she supposedly loved most. To save her own skin and protect her secret identity as Whistledown, Penelope does not hesitate to throw Eloise to the wolves.
Both of these young women could have been permanently, socially ruined by Penelope’s pen. Their entire futures were placed on the chopping block. That is not the behavior of a helpless victim; that is the execution of a cold, highly destructive power trip. Her trauma may explain her motives, but it absolutely cannot justify her cruelty.
https://www.google.com/search?q=He+could+hardly+write+down+%22dresses+for+Siena%22+in+the+official+ledger.+Instead%2C+he+simply+noted+the+names+of+the+exclusive+French+fashion+houses+or+shops+on+Bond+Street+where+he+settled+the+bills%2C+or+booked+it+under+a+general+entry+for+textiles+and+attire.%2FNederlandse+vertaling&sca_esv=3a75f9ad15a7c092&sxsrf=APpeQnsPu5rgjVTtweyOVBKBccR1pE-Qwg%3A1787003238298&ei=TIGDatrbMMKni-gP0_-0sQc&iflsig=ABILxe8AAAAAaoOPXK0qvt0Pq1uCp6I2oD1KpPnyiaWu&uact=5&sclient=gws-wiz&fbs=ABfTbFUyxjQn9bne4DuflY2dNqqKbvlIcC736Ld1YUW461Eync997olHw4iGJeJyp_B6AzQfOSm2QqMfcEtTAd0xitwlL75WL5-rJ1AhhihAZYTKCBnH7waDUIEX5NMGycAG6w3_9-AxX238ZF105GuqV4Z5MCyPIUCp1js9i-76FHILlhXSK9MbuwbxuvCkT7I15QlXW8jU&aep=10&ntc=1&mstk=AUtExfDx8DLf1s_Q4cnko_lMi-EJEZfpM_kVYFLiGJ2GkIIfbONhz7yhZR1ATbke7o7YnYzfcKCDv8GF0EqZkKesnbUVyQVKDT5faqJ_0TxcHnPkk5dRU0yS3bStqqXTHng2T63uOI5-OMB6vftL10x-s5IEniAaH50RIvzc9l__1cGzGgIbF4dVa-sTdofskDkpqwdwfQ_yErI4KvyKsLHy7Fiik1dh_qg_xReqYZtp8bLaz-IJ10Y5X5h0xI-P_vF2GV7sGsil3_f7Iw&aioh=3&csuir=1&cs=0&atvm=2&mtid=6MaDaq_zGtSdi-gP3PWMsQc&sec_src=gmail&lns_mode=cvst&elids=CKjG5cqf86D7ngEQARgBIhDqS4mJlmiuQi0Bs_1L-zIvOID4hrO4q5YDSAFQAmoA%2CCO-0vOjL2eGBrgEQARgBIhBS0D2bbpeNVc6rRx-ZlpuIOLCi6f63q5YDSAFQAmoA%2CCNTo35Sfs4mmvQEQARgBIhC4KM3dkG_rIBbh8wfjlVBlOIDruq65q5YDSAFQAmoA%2CCKn-vYbkwb2dvAEQARgBIhCHsXGBCif_Kg6ofopLH0uKOPC52di5q5YDSAFQAmoA%2CCKvxttTCj4fsmwEQARgBIhC31F3CuN4kIWJE0cMmHqqGONiXr7i8q5YDSAFQAmoA&udm=50

Reacties uitgeschakeld voor NOTE 1A

Opgeslagen onder Divers

Bridgerton/Sex scene against a tree between Anthony ad Siena/FUN, recklessness,Despair and the Urgency of Love

1x01-37

ANTHONY AND SIENA

thumbnail.jpg

thumbnail.jpg

thumbnail.jpg

SEX UNDER A TREE/EXCITING…….
thumbnail.jpg
LOVE SCENE UNDER THE BOXING PLATFORM
images.jpg

ANTHONY BRIDGERTON ON HIS WAY TO SIENA, TO THE PARK WHERE THEY HAD THEIR LOVE SCENE AGAINST A TREE

BRIDGERTON/SEX SCENE AGAINST A TREE BETWEEN ANTHONY AND SIENA/FUN, RECKLESSNESS, DESPAIR  AND THE URGENCY OF LOVE

”BREATH AND LIGHT YOU SHALL BE FOR ME…” [1A]
LA TRAVIATA [OPERA]

At the very First Time we meet young Viscount Anthony Bridgerton we saw him indulging in sex against a tree with a ”certain Lady”
I laughed and I laughed as I’m sure you did too

So young Anthony was just a rake, having reckless, exciting and provoking sex
Or was there more……..

JUST TRAVEL WITH ME TO REGENCY ERA…..

HALLO FOLKS

There She is again, your dedicated Bridgerton Fan!
As you’ll know, I already wrote a lot about Bridgerton, for you to see for Free [HAHAHAHA] [1]
Last English Post was dedicated to the Boxing Match Scene between Anthony Bridgerton and his First Love Siena [2]
I shared with you the Juicy Details [3] and travelled with you to the very very Place where Anthony Bridgerton and his two brothers enjoyed a Boxing Match, until Anthony discovered Opera singer Siena in the cheering crowd, and from that moment on, he had only eyes for her……..
Watch that Scene…..[4]
We, my FOLKS and I, sitting beneath in the crowd, witnessed the fact that Viscount Anthony stared at Siena and suddenly left the Place where the boxers were fighting and shortly afterwards, Siena left……
What happened then WE didn’t see, but watch the Scene right here .[5].
And since WE, as common Folks, only knew the proud Viscount by name, seeing him only when he galloped past us carelessly, and knowing Siena Rosso only as a celebrated Opera singer, we had no idea of any intimate connection between them.

If we had been people of the Ton [6] perhaps we would have found it suspicious, that they left the Boxing Room so shortly after one other……
But luckily for them, everyone [including the loyal brothers of the Viscount himself] got so caught up in the Match, that no one noticed their departure [except for the new ”protector” of Siena [7A], who accompanied her, but who however did not want any problems with a Lord]
So they could be together without being disturbed…..[7]

And the rest of their intense  relationship happens without our knowledge

SEX AGAINST A TREE/THE BEGINNING OF THE NEW SEASON

The rich and influential aristocratic Bridgerton Family has returned from the Off Season [the Period from Late Summer to Winter when the aristocracy left London to stay at their country Estates] [8] to return to London for the Start of a new Season [9] and especially the eldest son Viscount Anthony Bridgerton after the death of his father the Head of the Family [10] is very happy about their return
We’ll soon see, why…….

Once resettled in London, it became an extra busy Period for the Bridgerton Family, as alongside the usual social activities,  preparations had to be made for eldest daughter Daphne’s debut and her presentation at Court [11]

So Lady Violet, the Matriarch and the mother of the 8 Bridgerton children , had a lot on her mind and a lot to arrange [12], like her eldest son, the already mentioned Viscount  Anthony Bridgerton, being the Head of the Family [13]
But unfortunately he was  a LITTLE distracted, since his thoughts and mind  were elsewehere.

AT MATTERS OF THE HEART…..
YES:

Our young Viscount was desperately and passionately in love with a certain Lady, an Opera singer,  named Siena Rosso…..[14].

SEX AGAINST A TREE/ANTHONY BRIDGERTON, BEING HEAD OF THE FAMILY…..

Nowadays, we would say: “So what?”
But unfortunately for Anthony and Siena, their Story took place in the Regency Era, with its rigid class prejudices. And to make matters worse, Anthony was also the eldest son and Head of the Family, meaning that everything he did reflected on the Family and the Bridgerton name. [15]

FOR MAKE NO MISTAKE!

BECAUSE TO ANYONE, WHO  BELIEVES THAT BEING HEAD OF THE FAMILY WAS JUST A PRIVILEGED PLEASURE AND LUXURY IN REGENCY ERA, I WILL  GIVE A WAKE UP CALL HERE…..

Of course, there was the wealth, the privilege, and the political dominance. But there was a darker side—one that could be bitter and agonizing, leading to a deep despair and depression that shouldn’t be underestimated……  [16]

For being the Eldest Son and Head of the Family like Anthony Bridgerton, life didn’t belong to yourself only:
Head of a Family meant not only managing the Estates and arranging financial business, but the permanent care for the Family as a Collective and as I mentioned, your acts reflected on the Family. [17]

Now, that is no problem, as long as you play by the rules of
the Ton [London aristocracy] [18]
.But what if you fall passionately in love with the ‘wrong’ girl—such as an opera singer—and you desire something more than a fleeting affair?
For an aristocrat—and above all, the eldest son and Head of the Family—that is where the trouble begins…

A DOSE OF REALITY FOR THOSE, WHO THINK  THAT A YOUNG ARISTOCRAT, WHO IS HEAD OF A FAMILY, CAN DO WHATEVER HE LIKES…..

Of course, young men in Regency Era, especially young and rich aristocrats, had a lot of freedom, could buy whatever they liked, had big political influence, wined and dined in their rich clubs……etc…..

BUT AGAIN:
You had to play by the rules of the Game of the Ton….[19]
For while keeping an opera singer [who was considered an immoral woman in the Regency Era] [20] as a mistress was no problem at all, as long as it happened behind closed doors and was just sex and excitement with no real feelings [21] , it became a massive problem the moment real love was involved, since social death for the whole Family was a real risk, when a ”scandal” came out in the open or the aristocrat intended to marry the lady…… [21A]

And since the Affair could only take place behind closed doors, it was strictly forbidden [according to Ton rules] that an aristocrat and operasinger should meet in public and do things people who are in love do, like walking in Kew Gardens, wine and dine in restaurants, etc, etc……[22]

SEX AGAINST A TREE/SEPARATION IN THE OFF SEASON AND ”WALKING ON THIN ICE” IN THE OFFICIAL SEASON……

So the Bridgerton Family was in London Town again and directly were involved with the very busy new season, with all the social activities and especially the debut of Daphne, in which Anthony, being Head of the Family, played an important part [23]
That meant he had few times for other things, what certainly must have have frustrated him, since during the Off Season, when the Family was out of town [24] he had no chance to see Siena regularly.

During that Off Season Period he most likely visited her in London whenever was possible [25] as the distance from Aubrey Hall [the Bridgerton Estate]  to London was not so far [26], but since he had to keep his Affair as secret as possible and his meddling and dominant mother Lady Violet laid an immense pressure on him [27] he had to come up with all sorts of excuses whenever he wanted to go to London [since all the social activities were ended].
Therefore  he likely had not so much opportunity to see her and must have missed her a lot….

That was -understandably- the reason Anthony was very happy to return to London with his Family, very longing to see his beloved Siena again.
”BREATH AND LIGHT YOU SHALL BE FOR ME…”[28]

Yet they had to ”walk on thin ice”, since their Love Relationship was not permitted, considered as ”scandalous” by the Ton and Anthony’s mother Violet, giving him all the ”consolation” of a ”Cold Shoulder”……..[29]

And then I haven’t even mentioned Gossip Magazines like Lady Whistledown…..[30]

SEX AGAINST A TREE/DESPERATE TIMES CALL FOR DESPERATE MEASURES

What also definitely did not help to satisfy Anthony’s desire to be with Siena were his continuous obligations, as Head of the Family, for Daphne’s debut and her upcoming presentation at Court. [31]
Because of this, he most likely saw Siena much less than he would have wanedt, while also being pressured for every little thing by his demanding mother Lady
Violet.”   [32]

SO:
Torn between his obligations as Head of the Family and his Heart and frustrated by how little he saw Siena, since they couldn’t make a normal appointment ”In the Light” [restaurants, Kew Gardens etc] [33], he had to resort to extreme actions.
He  arranged a carriage to take Siena to a vast park, finally enabling them to meet again. Anthony came on horseback, several hours before his sister’s official presentation at Court—an event where he, as Head of the Family, was  obliged to attend, according to the Bridgerton Series [Historically it was different, see note 34]

As an added precaution, he arranged for the presence of a footman—a detail particularly funny and spicy for us as viewers to witness, yet for them a measure born out of pure and desperate necessity—who was tasked with keeping watch and holding curious onlookers at bay.
If anyone were to pass by that secluded spot at all…

SEX AGAINST A TREE/FREEDOM, RECKLESSNESS, LOVE AND DESPERATION
NOT ONLY SENSATION, BUT LOVE, PASSION AND DESPERATION

FOLKS
Many of you, loyal Bridgerton Fans, have viewed the Anthony and Siena Spicy Sex Against a Tree Scene and I imagine this is how you have picturing the Scene so Far

FUNNY, HOT, SPICY AND RECKLESS
Some of you may have thought that Anthony was a typical Rake [35, he was no Rake when the Story begins, being passionately in love with one woman, Siena], especially when rushing on horseback to the Presentation at Court Event/HAHAHA

And OF COURSE, the Scene is all that
FUNNY, HOT, SPICY AND RECKLESS

It is HOT AMUSEMENT, it is FUN looking at young, passionate people and it is RECKLESS, because for the risk of discovery is always there, even with a footman keeping watch…….

That may all be true, BUT NOW I GIVE YOU ANOTHER, DEEPER PERSPECTIVE

Because although young, passionate and somewhat ”reckless” Anthony and Siena’s actions stem primarily from exclusion (as they are barred from public spaces together] [36], desperation and forbidden love [37]
Forcing  them to make love under a boxing ring [38] , to have sex against a tree  [39], hiding from Society as if they were criminals…….

That’s the hypocrisy and Cruelty of Society:

First, they are denied normal meetings in public, and then, when they take refuge in dusty, dirty boxing rooms or make love against a tree deep in a park—just to be free with each other and avoid discovery—it is deemed ‘scandalous’ all over again……………………[40]

BACK TO THE STORY OF YOUNG VISCOUNT ANTHONY AND HIS BELOVED SIENA……

So Anthony arrives at the park on horseback, dismounts, nods at his footman, stands by the agreed-upon tree [they have been there before], and looks down the road, waiting longingly for his beloved……..

His whole face lights up when he sees the carriage with Siena arrive. When she steps out of her carriage, he runs toward her and they share a long embrace, happy and relieved to finally see each other again

She grabs  him with desperate strength, as if she never wants to let him go, acutely aware of how little time they have together.
He strokes her hair, whispering into her ear how deeply he has missed her. As she hisses that his family will always come first anyway, he pulls her fiercely into his arms, draws her toward the tree, and makes love to her with a passionate, almost desperate intensity, while at a distance, the footman keeps watch—his back turned to them, left arm extended toward any potential passersby.”

RECKLESS AND DARING?

Some of you Folks will say that he takes a big risk there….but think that it was a vast park and the chance to meet some of his peers is practically ZERO, since it also is the Social Event of the presentation of the debutantes [among else Anthony”s own sister Daphne] at Court.

RECKLESS FOR THE LADY?

Looking at the scene, it becomes clear that it is Anthony leaning against the tree—meaning his face is visible—while he holds the lady, whose back is turned toward any potential passersby. This is his way of protecting her and her identity. Furthermore, the distance to the road is so great that one would have to come much closer to see anything clearly. Even Anthony cannot be easily recognized from that distance, except perhaps by his closest kin. And they have no idea that he is giving expression to his passion in that park; they are safely inside Bridgerton House, waiting for him so they can go to the palace together for Daphne’s presentation at Court…

Because of their forbidden union, their passion is fierce. The otherwise proud Viscount, who normally reprimands his staff over the slightest speck on his clothes, almost relishes how Siena rips open his attire with her characteristic fiery intensity. But her own clothes have not escaped unscathed either. Fortunately, knowing Anthony, she made sure to have extra clothes waiting in her carriage. Anthony himself, as a precaution, had his footman bring a cloak belonging to his sister Daphne (who has clothes to spare and won’t miss it anyway), so Siena won’t have to walk back to her carriage looking disheveled. Passion on borrowed time, stolen from the cruel and ruthless class prejudices of the Ton and the pressure of Anthony’s mother, Lady Violet. [40A] A brief moment of time and love for one another, after that off-season and all the hectic preparations surrounding Daphne’s debut.

TIME…….THEIR GREAT PAIN……..

And how does it go with people in love?
They get so caught up in their passion that they completely lose track of time. Until Anthony, embracing Siena tenderly after their love scene, realizes that the clock ticks and he is very late.

Startled, Anthony gives a decidedly unhappy Siena a tender kiss, strokes her hair, leaps onto his horse, and makes his hasty escape to the Palace, to Daphne’s presentation at Court.
‘I’m coming to you as soon as possible,’ he whispers to her.
And Siena watches him ride away for a long time, before she finally stands up and slowly walks toward her carriage, still bittersweetly savoring those few stolen hours of love [41]

MEANTIME IN BRIDGERTON HOUSE
Meanwhile, at Bridgerton House, his Family is in panic.
As Daphne prepares for her presentation to the Queen, while Anthony is nowhere to be found.
After all, he knew about Daphne’s presentation.
It was even highly ironic: at the exact moment his mother, Lady Violet, was wondering aloud where Anthony could possibly be, he was experiencing his passionate moments with Siena.
With the strict schedule of the Royal Court looming and Daphne’s presentation at stake, Violet realizes they can wait no longer. In an act of sheer necessity, the Bridgerton family departs for the palace, without Anthony. [42]

RACING AGAINST THE CLOCK/ANTHONY’S ARRIVAL AT THE PALACE
So we see Anthony, our lovesick Viscount, who rather had stayed with Siena, racing against the clock,
Realizing he has completely lost track of time, Anthony had hastily teared himself away from Siena, doubtless with pain in his heart.
However, Anthony manages to intercept his family at the very last second, right at the gates of St. James’s Palace. As he steps forward to help Daphne out of the carriage, his breathless state, crooked cravat, and disheveled clothes betray the desperate urgency of where he has just been. [43]
NAUGHTY NAUGHTY……
Understandably his mother Lady Violet is not amused and she and her son exchange a quick glance.
From Violet’s side, there is a complex mixture of annoyance and deep-seated anxiety; she senses that something is slipping through her fingers. Anthony, in turn, counters her gaze with an irritated arrogance—a familiar, defensive shield he uses to mask his true feelings and the emotional turmoil underneath.
Those annoyed glances between mother and son clearly reveal Anthony”s inner struggle between his noble duties as Head of the Family and his Heart.

FUN, RECKLESSNESS AND EXCITEMENT?/LOVE, DESPERATION AND DUTY
THE SEEDS OF RESENTMENT
NOW FOLKS, WE DRAW THE FINAL CONCLUSION!
LET’S GO!
You and I have seen and witnessed [from screen/HAHAHA] A Hot, Spicy and Reckless Scene about a young aristocrat, Head of his Family and his Beloved one, an opera singer, a Love which was a no go area in Regency Era [44]
And no matter how powerful and privileged Anthony was, there was nothing he could do to change this hopeless situation for him and his beloved.
Their meetings had to be behind closed doors and their love was incriminated [45] and what was most painful for Anthony, not only his mother Violet opposed it fiercely-which was understandable given her justified fear for the social death [46], but unforgivable due to her later dehumanization of his beloved Siena [47] and her emotional blackmail of her son [48]
Constantly torn between his noble duties, the pressure from his mother, and his heart, he was forced into a double life, which took a heavy toll on his emotional and mental state and bred a growing resentment toward his mother [49]
And precisely because this love between an aristocrat and an opera singer was constantly criminalized, making normal encounters in public impossible, they were forced into extreme escapades—such as sex under the boxing ring and sex against a tree in a park. This, in turn, was viewed as reckless and scandalous by that very same high society that had excluded them in the first place.  [50]
The sex scene against the tree between Anthony and Siena may be funny and spicy, but it stemmed primarily from the impossibility of meeting each other outside in a normal way, combined with the pressure on Anthony to be involved in all the activities surrounding his sister Daphne’s debut.
While it is a funny and exciting scene for us to watch, for them it was a constant balancing act between what was or wasn’t risky, which could easily end in scandal. It was as if they were wanted criminals, when their only ‘crime’ was their love for one another.

YOU SEE IT NOW FOLKS?
IT’S NOT JUST ALL FUN, GAMES AND EXCITEMENT,  BUT ALSO BITTER DESPERATION…….

AND TO END WITH
THE BITTER FRUITS OF LADY VIOLET’S SABOTAGE AND SELECTIVE EXCUSES TO ANTHONY

For the way Lady Violet, Anthony’s mother, had dehumanized his beloved and deeply hurt her own son as a result [51], combined with the sabotage of his love affair [51A], she would later pay a bitter price.
Because Anthony did not merely respond to her pressure and sabotage [in Season 2, following his bitter heartbreak over Siena at the end of Season 1 and his declared intention to Simon and Daphne to marry solely out of duty] with a chilling coldness [consistently addressing her as “Dowager Viscountess”] [52], his resentment toward her ran even deeper.
Even after his marriage to Kate Sharma, which was born out of love, he continued to treat Violet with a dutiful but cold politeness. [52AA]
For it is a common misconception among fans that Violet’s apologies to Anthony at the end of Season 2 [52A] healed their bond.
On the contrary, because that apology was only meant for her [understandable] emotional absence during her painful period of grief after the death of her husband and Anthony’s father, Edmund.
For his much larger trauma which was still fresh —the bitter pain he had suffered from the breakup with Siena [I bring to mind his heartbreaking crying after the break up with Siena at the end of Season 1 and how only his best friend and now brother in law Simon Basset comforted him while Violet probably was more then relieved] and the destructive role his mother had played in it —she offered no apologies at all. [53A]

AND WHAT WAS WORST OF ALL, BY NOT OFFERING APOLOGIES FOR THAT DEEP WOUND, SHE ACTED AS IF NOTHING HAD HAPPENED, THEREBY CONSCIOUSLY OR
UNCONSCIOUSLY [I’LL LEAVE THAT IN THE MIDDLE], BY TRYING TO ERASE THE PAST, GIVING THE MESSAGE THAT HER SON’S DEEP FEELINGS FOR HIS FIRST LOVE DID NOT MATTER…..
And that, folks, is the crux of the matter.
The fact that someone finds happiness with a second woman [from his own social circle] does not erase the trauma of the forced breakup with his first love, especially if the person largely responsible for it refuses to take accountability  and moreover, is the very person who is supposed to protect and comfort him—his mother. [53]
When that happens, the scar and the distance remain.

Folks, it was nice sharing this Post with you again
I’LL WRITE MORE ABOUT VIOLET’S SELECTIVE EXCUSES AND ABOUT ANTHONY’S LASTING COLDNESS TOWARDS HER ANOTHER TIME

ASTRID ESSED

NOTES
NOTES 1 T/M 10
NOTES 11 T/M 20
NOTES 21 T/M 30
NOTES 31 T/M 40A
NOTES 41 T/M 50
NOTES 51 T/M 53
ADDED NOTE 1A
[1A]
BREATH AND LIGHT SHALL BE FOR ME
LA TRAVIATA
AI OVERVIEW
BREATH AND LIGHT YOU SHALL BE FOR ME../LA TRAVIATA/ARIA
This line refers to the famous duet “Un dì, felice, eterea” from Act I of Giuseppe Verdi’s opera La Traviata, where Alfredo confesses his deep love for Violetta, describing it as the heartbeat or breath of the entire universe (“ch’è palpito dell’universo intero”). [12]
Context of the Duet
  • The-Singer: Alfredo Germont (tenor) sings these passionate words to Violetta Valéry (soprano). [1]
  • The Meaning: Alfredo tells Violetta she flashed into his life like a radiant light, defining love as the breath of the universe and the “cross and ecstasy of the heart”. [12]
  • The Reaction: Violetta initially tries to brush it off with cynical detachment, claiming she cannot truly love, but she ultimately gives him a flower to return when it withers. [12]

Reacties uitgeschakeld voor Bridgerton/Sex scene against a tree between Anthony ad Siena/FUN, recklessness,Despair and the Urgency of Love

Opgeslagen onder Divers