NOTE 11/RESIST!

[11]

AMNESTY INTERNATIONAL INVESTIGATION CONCLUDES ISRAEL

IS COMMITTING GENOCIDE AGAINST PALESTINIANS IN GAZA

5 DECEMBER 2024

https://www.amnesty.org/en/latest/news/2024/12/amnesty-international-concludes-israel-is-committing-genocide-against-palestinians-in-gaza/

SEE FOR WHOLE TEXT, NOTE 1A

HUMAN RIGHTS WATCH
ISRAEL: UNLAWFUL GAZA BLOCKADE DEADLY FOR CHILDREN
SEE FOR WHOLE TEXT, NOTE 4
BTSELEM
TOTAL BLOCKADE AND DEATH TRAPS: HOW ISRAEL
IS STARVING THE GAZA STRIP
21 AUGUST 2025

Since October 2023, the Israeli regime has been committing genocide in the Gaza Strip. This includes the killing of tens of thousands, bodily and mental harm to hundreds of thousands, massive destruction of homes and civilian infrastructure, starvation, displacement and obstruction of humanitarian aid – all carried out systematically, as part of a coordinated attack designed to destroy living conditions in the Gaza Strip. Israel is continuing the onslaught despite countless warnings, and mounting evidence on the ground, of its lethal consequences. Together with many public clarifications by policymakers that the target is the entire population, this proves the political and military leadership’s intent to eradicate the continuation of Palestinian existence in Gaza.

Immediately after the Hamas-led attack on 7 October 2023, Israel imposed a total blockade on Gaza. In the months that followed, it intermittently barred entry of food, water, fuel and medicine through land crossings under its control. The aid it did allow in, following international pressure, was severely inadequate for the population’s needs. Within a short time, Israel also destroyed the civilian infrastructure for producing and distributing food. These measures left hundreds of thousands of people entirely dependent on humanitarian aid. The shortages also led to sharp price hikes across the Strip, further limiting access to food for most of the population. Aid organizations warned in the early stages of the fighting of a steep drop in food security. In April 2024, UN bodies declared that “without massive and consistent food assistance that can be delivered freely and safely, famine thresholds in Gaza will be breached within the next six weeks.”

Israel has also waged an unprecedented assault on Gaza’s civilian and social order. Throughout the months of fighting, Israeli forces have methodically targeted all law enforcement actors in the Strip, including police officers and commanders, as well as civil defense units. The resulting law enforcement vacuum was filled by armed criminal gangs, which operate across the Strip and have gained power thanks to Israel.

At the same time, Israel has painted a false picture that there is no severe hunger crisis in Gaza, accusing Hamas of stealing UN aid in areas where shortages existed. This allegation was denied by aid agencies on the ground. In a New York Times investigation published in late July 2025, senior Israeli military officials even admitted the military had never provided evidence of Hamas systematically stealing aid. Contrary to Israel’s claims, numerous reports and policy statements indicate that one of the main reasons Israel blocked aid into Gaza was to pressure Hamas, including by fomenting internal unrest among the civilian population. Two US government agencies responsible for aid distribution determined that Israel deliberately blocked and delayed humanitarian aid, and that it is primarily responsible for the hunger ravaging the Strip. In January 2024, UN experts concluded: “Israel is […] using food as a weapon against the Palestinian people.”

The deliberate starvation of Gaza, which branches of the UN designated “the hungriest place on Earth” in May 2025, is one means of destruction Israel is using in the genocide it is committing in Gaza. With every passing day, the hunger in Gaza deepens and more people, including children, die from causes related to hunger and malnutrition. Yet Israel continues its attempts to suppress the reality of the hunger crisis in Gaza.

This document presents Israel’s system of starvation in the Gaza Strip, which includes destroying food and means of food production, preventing food from entering, undermining existing aid systems and creating deadly conditions for obtaining food.

Starvation in figures

The latest analysis of food security (according to the IPC Famine Classification) found that about 2.1 million residents – almost the entire population of the Gaza Strip – are experiencing varying degrees of acute food insecurity. Roughly 37% of the population, about 775,000 people, are in “Crisis” (Phase 3), while more than 1,169,000 people (54%) are in Phases 4 and 5, classified as “Emergency” and “Catastrophe.”

At the end of July 2025, IPC experts issued their most severe famine warning to date, stating that “the worst-case famine scenario is now unfolding in Gaza.” According to the warning, about 500,000 people – a quarter of Gaza’s population – are currently experiencing daily famine. Indeed, throughout July, daily reports began emerging of people dying in Gaza from causes related to hunger and malnutrition. As of 21 August 2025, the Gaza Ministry of Health reported 271 deaths related to hunger and malnutrition, including 112 minors.

Israel’s system of starvation in Gaza

Withholding food and Destroying food production infrastructure

Blockade: Preventing the entry of aid

Even before the current Israeli offensive, about 64% of Gaza’s residents suffered from food insecurity, and around 80% required some form of humanitarian assistance. As soon as the attack on the Gaza Strip began, Israel declared a total blockade on the Strip, which led to a growing shortage of food products. That blockade lasted until 21 October 2023. At that point, Israel allowed in a very limited amount of humanitarian aid, and only through the Rafah Crossing on the border with Egypt. From 21 October to 23 November 2023, a total of 1,554 aid trucks entered through Rafah, 927 of them carrying food – compared with about 360 food trucks that had entered the Strip every day prior to the attack, when 20%–30% of food consumption was based on local production. During the first ceasefire, from 24 to 30 November 2023, a total of 1,209 aid trucks entered the Strip, 851 of them carrying food. On 17 December 2023, Israel began permitting aid in through the Kerem Shalom Crossing, as well. From 1 December 2023 to 18 January 2024, a total of 5,917 aid trucks entered, 4,048 of them carrying food.

Throughout 2024, some 41,000 aid trucks entered the Strip – an average of about 90 trucks a day, the vast majority carrying food. Almost all were sent to the southern Strip, where most of the population was concentrated at that stage, and the amount of aid that entered was far from sufficient. At the same time, only minimal amounts of food reached the northern Strip, via deliveries from the south, limited airdrops and a handful of trucks that entered directly.

Number of aid trucks entering the Gaza Strip, 21 October 2023 – 1 March 2025
From To Total no. of Trucks No. of food trucks Days Avg. no. of food trucks during that period
21 Oct. 2023 23 Nov. 2023 1,554 927 33 28
24 Nov. 2024 30 Nov. 2023 1,209 851 7 122
01 Dec. 2023 18 Jan. 2024 5,917 4,098 48 84
19 Jan. 2024 18 Jan. 2025 41,094 32,597 360 91
19 Jan. 2025 01 Mar. 2025 25,000 Unknown 43 581*

* Trucks with general items, not only food

After the second ceasefire was declared on 19 January 2025, Israel permitted relatively broad entry of aid: about 600 trucks a day, including some 50 fuel trucks. Some of the trucks entered northern Gaza directly through Zikim Crossing. However, on 2 March 2025, Israel again imposed a total blockade on the Strip, and on 18 March it violated the ceasefire and resumed fighting. For the next 77 days, Israel completely blocked aid from entering Gaza. According to the UN Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs (OCHA), only in mid-May 2025 was the Kerem Shalom Crossing partially reopened. Over three days, 198 trucks entered, some intended for the northern Strip, but were delayed by logistical disruptions, gunfire, looting and access blockages, and not all reached their destination. OCHA reported that these trucks were merely a drop in a bucket compared to actual needs: 60–64 trucks a day, at a time when at least 500–600 were required. Direct truck entry to the north via Zikim was restored only on 12 June.

Ibrahim al-Ghandur

Because of the hunger, my wife can barely nurse our nine-month-old son, Yamen, and baby formula is nowhere to be found either. A little while ago, we managed to buy a kilo of dates for NIS 40 (~ USD X), which has been helping us survive. We live off what we manage to get – a little rice, a little corn we ground, and also barley, which is meant for feeding farm animals. The price of barley has also gone crazy. Now even the barley ran out and people have started grinding bird and rabbit food. But there is not much of that either. There is no food for humans or for animals. Read the full testimony of Ibrahim al-Ghandur, A 38-year-old father of four from Beit Lahiya, 19 February 2024

On 27 July 2025, following international pressure, Israel announced it would allow more aid trucks in and establish humanitarian corridors and pauses for distribution. OCHA reported that about 100 trucks entered the Strip that day, but added that moving the aid to its intended destinations within Gaza remained extremely difficult even during pauses in fighting, and medical workers feared that the meager aid would arrive too late to save those already starving. That day, the Israeli military also carried out the first airdrop of food into Gaza – a practice that experts criticized as ineffective and that had caused fatalities when undertaken by the US and other countries during an earlier phase of the attack on Gaza. The amount of food dropped, equivalent to a single truckload, was negligible compared to the need.

Destroying food production infrastructure

Until October 2023, between 20% and 30% of food consumption in the Gaza Strip was based on agricultural produce grown within its territory. Yet, already in the first months of the assault, Israel disabled all local food production systems. According to analyses by FAO and UNOSAT, the Israeli assault has destroyed 75% of Gaza’s farmland, about 96% of livestock have died, more than 80% of the wells used for irrigation and over 70% of the greenhouses have been damaged, and the fishing industry has almost entirely shut down. Residents’ livelihoods have collapsed, and local food production has ceased to exist. The onslaught has not only caused the total collapse of food sources available in Gaza, but also inflicted severe, long-term damage that is likely to undermine the population’s ability to produce food in the future.

Undermining existing aid systems

International organizations, most notably UNRWA and the World Central Kitchen (WCK), as well as local initiatives such as community kitchens, have made dedicated efforts to prevent the starvation of the population from the beginning of the attack, striving to provide food. Yet Israel has continuously worked to thwart their operations:

UNRWA

Since the beginning of the attack, Israel has restricted the entry of aid into the Strip and in many cases refused to allow UNRWA convoys to transport aid from the south to the north.

The Israeli government, which has long sought to undermine and even eliminate UNRWA’s operations as part of its efforts to erase the Palestinian refugee status, exploited the Hamas-led 7 October attack to escalate its campaign against the agency, based on unproven allegations that some of its employees participated in the attack. In 2024 and early 2025, Israel passed legislation banning UNRWA’s activity inside Israel, as well as in the West Bank and the Gaza Strip. By January 2025, reports already indicated that UNRWA was preparing to halt its operations in these areas. According to UNRWA’s official reports, international staff have been barred from entering Gaza since late March 2025, and limited operations have continued only through local staff.

Israel’s forced shutdown of UNRWA, with full knowledge that no other body in Gaza can replace its wide range of civil functions, is expected to worsen the already severe hunger crisis and further undermine healthcare services. In addition to the political aim of dismantling UNRWA, Israel is seeking to deprive residents of any aid source not under its control, thereby increasing their dependence on the Israeli military and its affiliated aid mechanisms.

Community kitchens

As early as October 2023, a network of community kitchens was established in the Gaza Strip, initiated by the WCK in cooperation with UN agencies and Palestinian aid organizations. Community kitchens distributed hot meals to Gaza’s residents while suffering from a shortage of ingredients, as well as water and cooking gas, and often forced to use wood as fuel. They frequently had to suspend operations due to evacuation orders issued by the Israeli military or fighting nearby, and faced looting by desperate residents and organized gangs.

In three documented incidents, the military attacked WCK workers: on 1 April 2024, Israeli forces killed seven WCK staff members when they attacked an aid convoy near Deir al-Balah in central Gaza. Following the incident, the organization suspended its operations in the Strip for about a month. Prime Minister Netanyahu described the attack as tragic and unintentional.  On 30 November 2024, the military attacked WCK aid vehicles again, this time in Khan Yunis, killing three staff members. On 27 March 2025, Israeli forces killed a WCK volunteer while he was distributing food near a community kitchen in Gaza City.

By May 2025, most WCK kitchens had either closed or been transferred to local partner organizations, due to the severe shortage of food supplies after the blockade was reimposed in March 2025. On 21 June 2025, WCK resumed partial operations, distributing about 10,000 hot meals that day – compared with the 133,000 hot meals it distributed daily in the early months of 2025.

I would send the children to get food from a soup kitchen sometimes. They would stand in line for two hours and only come back with some lentils, rice or noodles. Sometimes, by the time it was their turn, the food would already be gone and they would return empty-handed. Many soup kitchens have now closed because they can’t get food, either. I stopped sending my children to soup kitchens since a house next to one was bombed. It’s too dangerous. Read the full testimony of Anwar Hamad, A 38-year-old mother of six from Jabalya Refugee Camp, 20 April 2025

Alongside the WCK kitchens, grassroots initiatives were launched, first in the north and center of the Strip and later also in the south, to operate civilian aid kitchens (tiqiyeh). These kitchens were set up by residents and maintained partly by volunteers, with funding and coordination from international aid agencies, chiefly the UN World Food Programme (WFP), in cooperation with local NGOs. They were often established in ruined buildings or open areas, without access to electricity or water. Even so, they succeeded in distributing hundreds of thousands of meals daily.

According to OCHA, in January 2025, during the second ceasefire, 170 kitchens operated in the Strip, distributing about 600,000 meals per day. In April 2025, after aid shipments resumed during the ceasefire, the kitchens provided a record one million meals. However, by May 2025, the impact of the full blockade Israel imposed in March was felt, with the number of meals dropping to 249,000. On 4 August, OCHA reported that 259,000 meals had been provided since 20 July 2025, 98 in northern Gaza and 161,000 in the center and south.

Shooting at people seeking food in the northern Gaza Strip

According to UN experts, between mid-January and the end of February 2024, at least 14 incidents were documented in which Israeli forces opened fire or carried out airstrikes against civilians who had gathered in different areas of the Strip to receive aid. In a particularly grave incident on 29 February 2024, soldiers fired at a crowd that had rushed flour trucks on a-Rashid Street in Gaza City. More than 100 people were killed and about 760 injured – some directly by military gunfire, others trampled by the panicked crowd. Later that month, Euro-Med Human Rights Monitor documented eight more incidents of Israeli forces shooting at people seeking food, including an incident on 14 March in which the military fired at a crowd of thousands of civilians gathered near a square on Salah a-Din Road in southern Gaza City. The shooting – carried out with tanks, attack helicopters, and drones – killed more than 80 people and injured around 200 others. Nine days later, on 23 March, the army again fired on a crowd that had gathered at the same square, killing at least 30 people and wounding 80 more.

In July 2025, two incidents were reported in which the Israeli army opened massive fire and killed dozens of people seeking food as they tried to reach aid trucks that had entered through the “Zikim” crossing in the northern part of the Strip. In the incident on 20 July, around 79 people were killed, and in the incident on 30 July, at least 48 people were killed.

I heard from people that the aid trucks were going to pass through the a-Tahliyah area. I got dressed and ran out of the house to get there early. When I arrived, there were already huge crowds, but no trucks with flour. Just masses of people waiting for them. Suddenly, Israeli tanks started to fire at the people. The first shell was fired at around 8:00 A.M. There were injuries and casualties. People went over to the wounded to try and help them, and then the army fired again. And again. The sight of the mutilated bodies was horrifying. Some were without hands and legs, others decapitated, some were shredded to bits. Read the full testimony of Muhammad Abu Mu’amar, A 37-year-old father of four from Khan Yunis, 17 June 2025

According to the Gaza Health Ministry, as of 20 August 2025, Israeli forces had killed 2,018 people in the Strip while they were attempting to obtain food and injured 14,947 others – most of them near GHF distribution centers.

We hid behind a sand dune. In front of us was a pit surrounded by concrete debris, which was slightly safer. We managed to sneak into it and we all lay on the ground. The fire intensified, and shells landed all around us. Almost everyone who raised their head even 10 centimeters was killed on the spot. Anyone who tried to move was killed or wounded. […]

I reached the distribution yard. There were Americans in military uniforms there, and also Palestinian workers. I don’t know who they were or where they came from. They wore green and blue vests and called out on microphones to direct people. They spoke to us disrespectfully, calling us “you dogs” and other insults. The yard was surrounded by sand berms, and the Americans in uniform stood on top of them. The food packages were on the ground, and each person grabbed as much as they could carry. Thank God, I managed to get a package with flour, sugar, oil, lentils, rice, tahini, noodles, and some kind of sauce. After taking the aid, I went back to the gate through which we came in. There’s only one gate, and it is also the exit. The Americans on the berms sprayed pepper spray and threw stun grenades at anyone who tried to escape the crush and approach the berms. I was hit by the pepper spray and my eyes burned badly. The Americans and the Palestinian workers there were also armed with electric batons. Read the full testimony of Hadi ‘Abed Rabu, A 40-year-old father of two from Jabalya town, 20 July 2025

GHF food distribution centers in southern and central Gaza: Death traps disguised as aid

In February 2025, amid mounting international criticism over the situation in the Gaza Strip, the US announced the establishment of the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF). Israel did not officially admit to co-founding the initiative but acknowledged transferring funds to cover the cost of building the sites, claiming they were intended to enable the direct distribution of food, water and medicine.

On 27 May 2025, GHF began operating four distribution centers through private American contractors and in coordination with the Israeli military: three in the southern Strip (two west of Rafah and one in Khan Yunis) and one in the center, in the “Netzarim Corridor.”

Those were the hardest moments of my life: the moment I found out Yamen was injured, the moment I found him lying in the morgue, and the moment that – only God knows how – I found the strength to call his mother and sisters to tell them he’d been killed. Yamen’s friends told me they’d gone together to the aid center, even though I forbade him from going. There was firing there from tanks, shells and machine guns, and people were killed and injured. Yamen tried to help one of the wounded, and was injured in the process. The bullet hit him in the waist and he was killed instantly. My son Yamen was shot dead only because he went to get aid, only because he wanted to bring his family flour, only because he tried to help someone who was wounded. Read the full testimony of Luai a-Za’anin, A 49-year-old father of four from Beit Hanoun, 29 June 2025

In their first days of operation, a UN representative already described these compounds as “death traps” where masses of hungry, exhausted people were forced to crowd together, inevitably leading to clashes over aid packages.

Since the opening of these centers, lethal shooting has regularly been documented inside and around them, including tank fire and, according to witnesses, quadcopter attacks, directed at unarmed people seeking food, killing and wounding many every day the centers were open.

On 3 June 2025, in response to a query by Haaretz, the Israeli military admitted that troops had fired at civilians approaching an aid compound, adding that it is “aware of reports regarding casualties, and the details of the incident are being looked into.” The military claimed that the fire was meant as deterrence, for example against “identified suspects who breached the designated access routes” to obtain food. Yet numerous testimonies contradict this claim.

The army declared the opening of “American aid centers,” which were basically death traps. […] [My son] Ousamah begged me to let him go there to get food, but I refused. I was afraid of losing him. In the end, I gave in to my daughters’ hunger. On the morning of 19 June 2025, Ousamah went [there] with my brother Ahmad and some other friends. […] At 11:00 P.M., my brother came back with Ousamah’s body. He was covered in blood and dirt. Ahmad told us an Israeli tank had fired a shell at them and hit Ousamah in the back, killing him and five others while they were opening boxes of aid. They all died on the spot. […] He left behind a wife who was three months pregnant and five sisters. He died trying to bring us and his sisters bread. Read the full testimony of Sumayah Abu Qas, A 45-year-old mother of six from Beit Lahiya, 27 June 2025

In testimonies given to Haaretz in June 2025, soldiers and officers said they had been ordered to shoot directly at unarmed Palestinians gathered around distribution centers, both before and after the food was handed out, in order to drive them away. According to these accounts, the armored corps shot live ammunition and tanks fired shells at civilians waiting for aid – not as warning shots, but as targeted fire, although they posed no threat.

Anthony Aguilar, a former US Army officer who worked as a security contractor for GHF, described what he saw at the centers to Israeli TV Channel 13 on 26 July 2025: “IDF soldiers firing live ammunition at the Palestinians […] I saw artillery rounds being used. I saw machine gun fire being used, mortar fire being used, tank rounds, main tank rounds from the Merkava tanks.”

A month earlier, an American security contractor employed by GHF in Gaza gave an account of the systematic violence around these centers to the news site Zeteo. He described heavily armed soldiers working alongside young, untrained civilian workers, and said he never saw shooting coming from the people receiving aid. He reported the Israeli fire was often indiscriminate, targeting even those quietly waiting in line, which made the access to food dangerous, chaotic and violent.

UN agencies, including the Center for Constitutional Rights (CCR), OCHA and UNRWA, as well as human rights organizations such as Gisha, Médecins Sans Frontières, CCR and al-Haq, issued an official call to end the initiative. They argued that combining aid distribution with military control is not humanitarian, and that shootings occurring at aid sites may constitute war crimes or crimes against humanity.

[…] my mother, my brother Ahmad, 12, and I went together. […] When we approached [the aid distribution site], the army suddenly opened massive fire. It was unbelievable. […] When the shooting stopped, we moved again towards the distribution site. I was in front, and behind me, my mother was holding Ahmad’s hand. Then the shooting resumed, and a bullet hit my mother in the head. I turned around and saw her lying on the ground. I thought she had fainted; I couldn’t imagine she’d been killed. Read the full testimony of Mirvat Zidan, A 20-year-old resident of al-Amal neighborhood in Khan Yunis, 17 June 2025

From the outset, the UN and other aid organizations refused to participate in the GHF centers, arguing that concentrating a limited number of mass distribution points mostly in the southern Strip would force starving residents to move with their families toward the area near the Egyptian border, “indicat[ing] a deliberate policy of forcing residents from the north – a pattern observed previously in the conflict.” UN Under-Secretary-General for Humanitarian Affairs Tom Fletcher called the initiative a “cynical sideshow. A deliberate distraction. A fig leaf for further violence and displacement.” He said the project aimed to create military buffer zones, especially in the north, while pushing the population southward. An Israeli official involved in planning the project admitted that its goal was to present the world with a “show” of aid distribution to ease international pressure on Israel.

People take risks and go towards the entrance because whoever gets in first has a higher chance of getting the aid. Sometimes the army allows us to get close and then starts shooting. […] One night, I went there and waited as usual. I started advancing together with other people because we thought it was allowed, and then everyone started running together. Suddenly, there was a barrage of heavy fire from tanks stationed a few hundred meters from us and from drones. I lay down on the ground behind a dirt embankment, crawled and got away. That night, more than 30 people were killed […]. I’ve walked kilometers, crawled, run, pushed in among thousands of people, all while risking my life. And in the end, I come back with nothing. Read the full testimony of Basel Kafinah, A 28-year-old from a-Nuseirat R.C., 1 July 2025

Despite mounting reports, Prime Minister Netanyahu and members of his government refrained from publicly addressing the casualties at these centers.

Taken together, these facts indicate that the GHF centers were designed, in part, to serve Israel’s plan to forcibly transfer Gaza’s population, in the spirit of the Trump Plan, rather than to provide access to aid that would actually help the starving population, while further worsening living conditions. In other words, these so-called aid centers are in fact another tool for implementing Israel’s policy of starvation as an instrument of ethnic cleansing.

Reacties uitgeschakeld voor NOTE 11/RESIST!

Opgeslagen onder Divers

NOTE 10/RESIST!

[10]
BBC
TRUMP’S 20-POINT GAZA PEACE PLAN IN FULL
9 OCTOBER 2025
SEE FOR THE WHOLE TEXT, NOTE 1

Reacties uitgeschakeld voor NOTE 10/RESIST!

Opgeslagen onder Divers

NOTE 9/RESIST!

[9]
BBC
TRUMP’S 20-POINT GAZA PEACE PLAN IN FULL
9 OCTOBER 2025
SEE FOR THE WHOLE TEXT, NOTE 1

Reacties uitgeschakeld voor NOTE 9/RESIST!

Opgeslagen onder Divers

NOTE 8/RESIST!

[8]

INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE

LEGAL CONSEQUENCES ARISING FROM THE POLITICS AND PRACTICES

OF ISRAEL IN THE OCCUPIED PALESTINIAN TERRITORY, INCLUDING EAST

JERUSALEM

https://www.icj-cij.org/sites/default/files/case-related/186/186-20240719-pre-01-00-en.pdf

SEE FOR THE WHOLE REPORT

https://www.icj-cij.org/sites/default/files/case-related/186/186-20240719-adv-01-00-en.pdf

EXTRACT FROM

https://www.icj-cij.org/sites/default/files/case-related/186/186-20240719-pre-01-00-en.pdf

INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE

Peace Palace,

Carnegieplein 2,

2517 KJ The Hague,

Netherlands

Tel.: +31 (0)70 302 2323

Fax: +31 (0)70 364 9928

Website X YouTube LinkedIn

Press Release

Unofficial

No. 2024/57

July 2024

Legal Consequences arising from the Policies and Practices of Israel in the Occupied Palestinian Territory, including East Jerusalem

The Court gives its Advisory Opinion and responds to the questions posed by the General Assembly

THE HAGUE, 19 July 2024.

The International Court of Justice has today given its Advisory Opinion in respect of the Legal Consequences arising from the Policies and Practices of Israel in the Occupied Palestinian Territory, including East Jerusalem.

It is recalled that, on 30 December 2022, the General Assembly of the United Nations adopted resolution A/RES/77/247 in which, referring to Article 65 of the Statute of the Court, it requested the International Court of Justice to give an advisory opinion on the following questions:

(a)

What are the legal consequences arising from the ongoing violation by Israel of the right of the Palestinian people to self-determination, from its prolonged occupation, settlement and annexation of the Palestinian territory occupied since 1967, including measures aimed at altering the demographic composition, character and status of the Holy City of Jerusalem, and from its adoption of related discriminatory legislation and measures?

(b) How do the policies and practices of Israel referred to . . . above affect the legal status of the occupation, and what are the legal consequences that arise for all States and the United Nations from this status?”

In its Advisory Opinion, the Court responds to the questions posed by the General Assembly by concluding that:

 the State of Israel’s continued presence in the Occupied Palestinian Territory is unlawful;

 the State of Israel is under an obligation to bring to an end its unlawful presence in the Occupied Palestinian Territory as rapidly as possible;

 the State of Israel is under an obligation to cease immediately all new settlement activities, and to evacuate all settlers from the Occupied Palestinian Territory;

 the State of Israel has the obligation to make reparation for the damage caused to all the natural or legal persons concerned in the Occupied Palestinian Territory;

PAGE 2

– 2 –

 all States are under an obligation not to recognize as legal the situation arising from the unlawful presence of the State of Israel in the Occupied Palestinian Territory and not to render aid or assistance in maintaining the situation created by the continued presence of the State of Israel in the Occupied Palestinian Territory;

international organizations, including the United Nations, are under an obligation not to recognize as legal the situation arising from the unlawful presence of the State of Israel in the Occupied Palestinian Territory; and

the United Nations, and especially the General Assembly, which requested the opinion, and the Security Council, should consider the precise modalities and further action required to bring to an end as rapidly as possible the unlawful presence of the State of Israel in the Occupied Palestinian Territory.

Reasoning of the Court

After concluding that it has jurisdiction to render the requested opinion and that there are no compelling reasons for it to decline to give an opinion (paras. 22-50), the Court recalls the general context of the case (paras. 51-71) and addresses the scope and meaning of the two questions posed by the General Assembly (paras. 72-83).

The Court then assesses the conformity of Israel’s policies and practices in the Occupied Palestinian Territory, as identified in question (a), with its obligations under international law. In particular, the Court’s analysis examines, in turn, the questions of the prolonged occupation, Israel’s policy of settlement, the question of the annexation of the Palestinian territory occupied since 1967, and Israel’s adoption of related legislation and measures that are allegedly discriminatory (paras. 103-243).

With regard to the question of the prolonged occupation of the Occupied Palestinian Territory, which has lasted for more than 57 years (paras. 104-110), the Court observes that, by virtue of its status as an occupying Power, a State assumes a set of powers and duties with respect to the territory over which it exercises effective control.

The nature and scope of these powers and duties are always premised on the same assumption: that occupation is a temporary situation to respond to military necessity, and it cannot transfer title of sovereignty to the occupying Power.

In the Court’s view, the fact that an occupation is prolonged does not in itself change its legal status under international humanitarian law.

Although premised on the temporary character of the occupation, the law of occupation does not set temporal limits that would, as such, alter the legal status of the occupation

Occupation consists of the exercise by a State of effective control in foreign territory.

In order to be permissible, therefore, such exercise of effective control must at all times be consistent with the rules concerning the prohibition of the threat or use of force, including the prohibition of territorial acquisition resulting from the threat or use of force, as well as with the right to self‑determination.

Therefore, the fact that an occupation is prolonged may have a bearing on the justification under international law of the occupying Power’s continued presence in the occupied territory.

As regards Israel’s settlement policy (paras. 111-156), the Court reaffirms what it stated in its Advisory Opinion on the Legal Consequences of the Construction of a Wall in the Occupied Palestinian Territory of 9 July 2004, that the Israeli settlements in the West Bank and East Jerusalem, and the régime associated with them, have been established and are being maintained in violation of international law. The Court notes with grave concern reports that Israel’s settlement policy has been expanding since the Court’s 2004 Advisory Opinion.

PAGE 3

– 3 –

As regards the question of the annexation of the Occupied Palestinian Territory (paras. 157-179), it is the view of the Court that to seek to acquire sovereignty over an occupied territory, as shown by the policies and practices adopted by Israel in East Jerusalem and the West Bank, is contrary to the prohibition of the use of force in international relations and its corollary principle of the non-acquisition of territory by force.

The Court then examines the question of the legal consequences arising from Israel’s adoption of related discriminatory legislation and measures (paras. 180-229).

It concludes that a broad array of legislation adopted and measures taken by Israel in its capacity as an occupying Power treat Palestinians differently on grounds specified by international law.

The Court notes that this differentiation of treatment cannot be justified with reference to reasonable and objective criteria nor to a legitimate public aim.

Accordingly, the Court is of the view that the régime of comprehensive restrictions imposed by Israel on Palestinians in the Occupied Palestinian Territory constitutes systemic discrimination based on, inter alia, race, religion or ethnic origin, in violation of Articles 2, paragraph 1, and 26 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, Article 2, paragraph 2, of the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, and Article 2 of the International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination.

The Court then turns to the aspect of question (a) that enquires as to the effects of Israel’s policies and practices on the exercise of the Palestinian people’s right to self‑determination (paras. 230-243).

In this regard, the Court is of the view that, as a consequence of Israel’s policies and practices, which span decades, the Palestinian people has been deprived of its right to self‑determination over a long period, and further prolongation of these policies and practices undermines the exercise of this right in the future.

For these reasons, the Court considers that Israel’s unlawful policies and practices are in breach of Israel’s obligation to respect the right of the Palestinian people to self‑determination.

Turning to the first part of question (b), the Court examines whether and, if so, how the policies and practices of Israel have affected the legal status of the occupation in light of the relevant rules and principles of international law (paras. 244-264).

In this respect, the Court first considers that the first part of question (b) is not whether the policies and practices of Israel affect the legal status of the occupation as such.

Rather, the Court is of the view that the scope of the first part of the second question concerns the manner in which Israel’s policies and practices affect the legal status of the occupation, and thereby the legality of the continued presence of Israel, as an occupying Power, in the Occupied Palestinian Territory.

This legality is to be determined under the rules and principles of general international law, including those of the Charter of the United Nations.

In this context, the Court is of the view that Israel’s assertion of sovereignty and its annexation of certain parts of the territory constitute a violation of the prohibition of the acquisition of territory by force

This violation has a direct impact on the legality of Israel’s continued presence, as an occupying Power, in the Occupied Palestinian Territory.

The Court considers that Israel is not entitled to sovereignty over or to exercise sovereign powers in any part of the Occupied Palestinian Territory on account of its occupation.

Nor can Israel’s security concerns override the principle of the prohibition of the acquisition of territory by force.

The Court further observes that the effects of Israel’s policies and practices, and its exercise of sovereignty over certain parts of the Occupied Palestinian Territory, constitute an obstruction to the exercise by the Palestinian people of its right to self-determination.

The effects of these policies and practices include Israel’s annexation of parts of the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the fragmentation of this territory, undermining its integrity, the deprivation of the Palestinian people of the enjoyment of the natural resources of the territory and its impairment of the Palestinian people’s right to pursue its economic, social and cultural development.

PAGE 4

– 4 –

The Court is of the view that the above-described effects of Israel’s policies and practices, resulting, inter alia, in the prolonged deprivation of the Palestinian people of its right to self-determination, constitute a breach of this fundamental right.

This breach has a direct impact on the legality of Israel’s presence, as an occupying Power, in the Occupied Palestinian Territory.

The Court is of the view that occupation cannot be used in such a manner as to leave indefinitely the occupied population in a state of suspension and uncertainty, denying them their right to selfdetermination while integrating parts of their territory into the occupying Power’s own territory

In light of the foregoing, the Court turns to the examination of the legality of the continued presence of Israel in the Occupied Palestinian Territory (paras. 259-264).

The Court considers that the violations by Israel of the prohibition of the acquisition of territory by force and of the Palestinian people’s right to self-determination have a direct impact on the legality of the continued presence of Israel, as an occupying Power, in the Occupied Palestinian Territory.

The sustained abuse by Israel of its position as an occupying Power, through annexation and an assertion of permanent control over the Occupied Palestinian Territory and continued frustration of the right of the Palestinian people to self-determination, violates fundamental principles of international law and renders Israel’s presence in the Occupied Palestinian Territory unlawful.

This illegality relates to the entirety of the Palestinian territory occupied by Israel in 1967.

This is the territorial unit across which Israel has imposed policies and practices to fragment and frustrate the ability of the Palestinian people to exercise its right to self‑determination, and over large swathes of which it has extended Israeli sovereignty in violation of international law The entirety of the Occupied Palestinian Territory is also the territory in relation to which the Palestinian people should be able to exercise its right to self-determination, the integrity of which must be respected.

* The Court has found that Israel’s policies and practices referred to in question (a) are in breach of international law.

The maintenance of these policies and practices is an unlawful act of a continuing character entailing Israel’s international responsibility.

The Court has also found in reply to the first part of question (b) that the continued presence of Israel in the Occupied Palestinian Territory is illegal

The Court therefore addresses the legal consequences arising from Israel’s policies and practices referred to in question (a) for Israel, together with those arising from the illegality of Israel’s continued presence in the Occupied Palestinian Territory under question (b), for Israel, for other States and for the United Nations (paras. 267-281).

President SALAM appends a declaration to the Advisory Opinion of the Court; VicePresident SEBUTINDE appends a dissenting opinion to the Advisory Opinion of the Court;

Judge TOMKA appends a declaration to the Advisory Opinion of the Court;

Judges TOMKA, ABRAHAM and AURESCU append a joint opinion to the Advisory Opinion of the Court;

Judge YUSUF appends a separate opinion to the Advisory Opinion of the Court;

Judge XUE appends a declaration to the Advisory Opinion of the Court;

Judges IWASAWA and NOLTE append separate opinions to the Advisory Opinion of the Court;

Judges NOLTE and CLEVELAND append a joint declaration to the Advisory Opinion of the Court;

Judges CHARLESWORTH and BRANT append declarations to the

PAGE 5

– 5 –

Advisory Opinion of the Court; Judges GÓMEZ ROBLEDO and CLEVELAND append separate opinions to the Advisory Opinion of the Court; Judge TLADI appends a declaration to the Advisory Opinion of the Court.

___________

A full summary of the Advisory Opinion appears in the document entitled “Summary 2024/8”, to which summaries of the declarations and opinions are annexed. This summary and the full text of the Advisory Opinion are available on the case page on the Court’s website.

___________

Earlier press releases relating to this case are also available on the website.

___________

Note: The Court’s press releases are prepared by its Registry for information purposes only and do not constitute official documents.

The International Court of Justice (ICJ) is the principal judicial organ of the United Nations.

It was established by the United Nations Charter in June 1945 and began its activities in April 1946.

The Court is composed of 15 judges elected for a nine-year term by the General Assembly and the Security Council of the United Nations.

The seat of the Court is at the Peace Palace in The Hague (Netherlands). The Court has a twofold role: first, to settle, in accordance with international law, legal disputes submitted to it by States; and, second, to give advisory opinions on legal questions referred to it by duly authorized United Nations organs and agencies of the system.

Information Department:

Ms Monique Legerman, First Secretary of the Court, Head of Department: +31 (0)70 302 2336

Ms Joanne Moore, Information Officer: +31 (0)70 302 2337

Z

SEE ALSO

https://www.astridessed.nl/international-court-of-justice-press-release-19-july-2024-legal-consequences-arising-from-the-policies-and-practices-of-israel-in-the-occupied-palestinian-territory-including-east-jerusalem/

Reacties uitgeschakeld voor NOTE 8/RESIST!

Opgeslagen onder Divers

NOTE 7/RESIST!

[7]
”Governments should also seek justice for the atrocities committed with impunity over the past two years, including the Hamas-led war crimes and crimes against humanity on October 7 and thereafter and Israeli authorities’ war crimes, crimes against humanity, and acts of genocide in Gaza.”
HUMAN RIGHTS WATCH
GAZA: CEASEFIRE NO SUBSTITUTE  FOR ACTION ON AID,
JUSTICE
9 OCTOBER 2025

(Jerusalem) – The Israeli government and Hamas agreed on October 9, 2025, to the first stage of the US government’s “Comprehensive Plan to End the Gaza Conflict,” which includes a ceasefire, the release of Israeli and other hostages held in Gaza and Palestinians from Israeli detention, an increase in the entry of humanitarian aid into Gaza, and phased withdrawal of the Israeli military from parts of Gaza.

The following quote can be attributed to Balkees Jarrah, acting Middle East and North Africa director at Human Rights Watch:

“The October 9 ceasefire announcement offers the prospect of desperately needed relief for Palestinian civilians in Gaza, who for two years have faced unlawful killings, starvation, forcible displacement, and property destruction, as well as for Israeli hostages and Palestinian detainees and their families.

However, Palestinians in Gaza will continue to suffer and die so long as Israel maintains its unlawful blockade of the Gaza Strip, including by restricting the United Nations and other humanitarian organizations from delivering desperately needed large-scale aid. It is also vital for Israel to ensure the immediate restoration of basic services like electricity, water, and health care, or Palestinians will continue to die from malnutrition, dehydration, and disease.

Now is not the time to exhale. Governments should not wait for the US plan to go into effect to take urgent action to prevent further violations of the basic rights of Palestinians in Gaza and the West Bank, including imposing an arms embargo on the Israeli government and targeted sanctions against Israeli officials credibly implicated in ongoing abuses.

Governments should also seek justice for the atrocities committed with impunity over the past two years, including the Hamas-led war crimes and crimes against humanity on October 7 and thereafter and Israeli authorities’ war crimes, crimes against humanity, and acts of genocide in Gaza. The government should support the International Criminal Court and address root causes, including Israel’s crimes against humanity of apartheid and persecution against Palestinians.”

Reacties uitgeschakeld voor NOTE 7/RESIST!

Opgeslagen onder Divers

NOTES 5 AND 6/RESIST!

[5]
HAMAS IS THE LEGITIMATE PALESTINIAN RESISTANCE MOVEMENT
AGAINST THE ISRAELI OCCUPATION TERROR
ASTRID ESSED
24 AUGUST 2025
MIDDLE EAST MONITOR
UN RAPPORTEUR: HAMAS IS AN ELECTED POLITICAL FORCE,
NOT A BAND OF MURDERERS
18 AUGUST 2025

On Sunday, Francesca Albanese, the UN Special Rapporteur on human rights in the occupied Palestinian territories, emphasised that Hamas should be recognised as a legitimate political movement rather than a group of murderers. She noted that Hamas plays a significant administrative and service role in the Gaza Strip, asserting that the organisation came to power after winning what she described as the most democratic elections in the region, not only in Palestine.

Albanese pointed out that many individuals repeat mainstream narratives about Hamas without a true understanding of its role. She highlighted that the movement has established schools, public institutions, and hospitals, positioning itself as the de facto authority in Gaza.

Rejecting the portrayal of Hamas as solely a militant group, Albanese stated, “Hamas is not a band of murderers or heavily armed fighters, as it is often depicted in various narratives.”

The UN rapporteur has also previously accused over 60 international corporations, including prominent arms and technology firms, of facilitating Israeli military operations in Gaza and supporting settlements in the West Bank.

Albanese characterised the ongoing situation in Gaza as a “campaign of genocide,” driven primarily by profit motives. She urged companies to cease their business dealings with Israel and called for accountability for their CEOs under international humanitarian law.

“At a time when lives are being lost in Gaza and the West Bank is facing escalating violence, this report highlights a crucial reason why Israel’s genocide continues: it is profitable for many involved,” she stated.

[6]

MIDDLE EAST MONITOR
UN RAPPORTEUR: HAMAS IS AN ELECTED POLITICAL FORCE,
NOT A BAND OF MURDERERS
18 AUGUST 2025
SEE FOR THE WHOLE TEXT, NOTE 5

Reacties uitgeschakeld voor NOTES 5 AND 6/RESIST!

Opgeslagen onder Divers

NOTE 4/RESIST!

[4]
HUMAN RIGHTS WATCH
ISRAEL: UNLAWFUL GAZA BLOCKADE DEADLY FOR CHILDREN

Update October 19, 2023: President Joe Biden announced that the United States mediated an agreement allowing the movement of up to 20 trucks of food, medicine, and water into Gaza. The United Nations Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs (OCHA) has urged negotiators to raise their “level of ambition.” OCHA reported that, in August 2023 alone, 12,072 truckloads of “authorized goods entered Gaza through the Israeli and Egyptian-controlled crossings.” After the total siege on the civilian population on October 9, a single dispatch of 20 truckloads does not adequately address the dire humanitarian situation in Gaza, Human Rights Watch said. Israel’s international partners should press the Israeli government to restore water and electricity supplies and lift its unlawful restrictions on aid delivery and closure.

(Jerusalem) – The Israeli government should immediately end its total blockade of the Gaza Strip that is putting Palestinian children and other civilians at grave risk, Human Rights Watch said today. The collective punishment of the population is a war crime. Israeli authorities should allow desperately needed food, medical aid, fuel, electricity, and water into Gaza, and let sick and wounded civilians leave to receive medical treatment elsewhere.

Israel announced on October 18, 2023, that it would allow food, water, and medicine to reach people in southern Gaza from Egypt, but without electricity or fuel to run the local power plant or generators, or clear provision of aid to those in the north, this falls short of meeting the needs of Gaza’s population.

The Israeli bombardment and total blockade have exacerbated the longstanding humanitarian crisis resulting from Israel’s unlawful 16-year closure of Gaza, where more than 80 percent of the population relies on humanitarian aid. Doctors in Gaza report being unable to care for children and other patients because the hospitals are overwhelmed by victims of Israeli airstrikes. On October 17, a munition struck al-Ahli Hospital in Gaza City, causing mass casualties; Hamas blamed Israel for the strike, while Israel said it was a rocket misfire by Palestinian militants. Human Rights Watch is looking into the strike.

Public health officials said the lack of water, contamination of areas by sewage, and many bodies that cannot be safely stored in morgues could trigger an infectious disease outbreak.

“Israel’s bombardment and unlawful total blockade of Gaza mean that countless wounded and sick children, among many other civilians, will die for want of medical care,” said Bill Van Esveld, associate children’s rights director at Human Rights Watch. “US President Joe Biden, who is in Israel today, should press Israeli officials to completely lift the unlawful blockade and ensure the entire civilian population has prompt access to water, food, fuel, and electricity.”

Senior Israeli officials have said the total blockade of the Gaza Strip, where children comprise nearly half of the population of 2.2 million, is part of efforts to defeat Hamas, following its October 7 attack on Israel. Hamas-led Palestinian fighters killed more than 1,300 people, according to Israeli authorities, and took scores of civilians, including women and children, as hostages. On October 9, Israeli Defense Minister Yoav Gallant announced “a complete siege … no electricity, no water, no food, no fuel. We are fighting human animals, and we act accordingly.” The Palestinian Health Ministry has reported, as of October 18, that 3,478 Palestinians have been killed. The Palestinian rights group Defense for Children International – Palestine reported that more than 1,000 children are among those killed.

The laws of war do not prohibit sieges or blockades of enemy forces, but they may not include tactics that prevent civilians’ access to items essential for their survival, such as water, food, and medicine. Parties to the conflict must allow and facilitate the rapid passage of impartial humanitarian aid for all civilians in need. Aid may be inspected but not arbitrarily delayed.

In addition, during military occupations, such as in Gaza, the occupying power has a duty under the Fourth Geneva Convention, to the fullest extent of the means available to it, “of ensuring the food and medical supplies of the population.” Starvation as a method of warfare is prohibited and is a war crime.

Under international human rights law, states must respect the right to water, which includes refraining from limiting access to, or destroying, water services and infrastructure as a punitive measure during armed conflicts as well as respecting the obligations to protect objects indispensable for survival of the civilian population.

Israel’s total blockade against the population in Gaza forms part of the crimes against humanity of apartheid and persecution that Israeli authorities are committing against Palestinians.

News media reported on October 17 that Israel had refused to allow humanitarian aid into Gaza, while Egypt was refusing to allow Palestinians to cross into the Sinai. Egypt and Israel should permit civilians to pass through their respective crossings to seek at least temporary protection or life-saving medical care, while also ensuring that anyone who flees is entitled to voluntary return in safety and dignity.

Lack of Medical Care

Shortages of medical equipment, supplies, and medication in the face of overwhelming casualties are causing avoidable deaths in hospitals in the Gaza Strip. More than 60 percent of patients are children, Dr. Midhat Abbas, director general of health in Gaza, told Human Rights Watch. An intern emergency room doctor at Al-Aqsa Martyrs Hospital wept while speaking to Human Rights Watch by phone on October 15:

Yesterday, in the intensive care unit, it was full, and all ventilators were in use. A child came in with head trauma who needed a ventilator. They had to choose between two children, who would die. He [the doctor] made a decision that one child was more promising to treat, so we were forced to switch the ventilator, and the other child died.

A doctor at the Northern Medical Complex said that on the night of October 14, intensive-care unit medics had to disconnect an adult patient from a ventilator to use it for a 10-year-old. He said a lack of medical supplies had obliged him to stitch a woman’s head wound without gloves or sterile equipment.

In a voice message on October 14, a doctor at al-Shifa hospital described a group of patients with “back wounds, including compound fractures, that can be really painful.” He said that the hospital had run out of painkillers to administer to them.

Ghassan Abu Sitta, a British surgeon volunteering at al-Shifa hospital, posted on social media on October 10, that “the hospitals, because of the siege, are so short of supplies that we had to clean a teenage girl with 70 percent body surface burns with regular soap because the hospital is out of chlorhexidine (antiseptic).” On October 14, he said in a voice note shared with Human Rights Watch: “We are no longer able to do anything but the most life-saving surgeries” because medical supplies were exhausted, and deaths and injuries had caused staff shortages.

More than 5,500 pregnant women in the Gaza Strip are expected to deliver within the next month, but face “compromised functionality of health facilities” and lack of “lifesaving supplies,” the United Nations Population Fund said on October 13.

“We need insulin [for diabetics],” said the head of a UN Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees in the Near East (UNRWA) shelter on October 15. “People are dying.” The shelter was overwhelmed with 15,000 internally displaced people.

The UN World Health Organization stated on October 14 that it had flown medical and basic health supplies for 300,000 patients to Egypt, near the Gaza Strip’s southern border, and more than 1,000 tons of other humanitarian aid had been shipped to the area. As of October 17, though, humanitarian workers and aid remain blocked via the Rafah border crossing. Israeli attacks have reportedly hit the crossing repeatedly, rendering it unsafe. Egyptian Foreign Minister Sameh Shoukry said four Egyptian aid workers were injured in the Israeli strikes and that “there is not yet any sort of authorization for a safe passage from the other side of the crossing.”

Israel’s order on October 13 to all civilians located in the north of the Gaza Strip to evacuate to the south exacerbated the medical crisis: 21 hospitals currently holding more than 2,000 patients are located in this region. The World Health Organization said the evacuations “could be tantamount to a death sentence” for the sick and injured and said hospitals were already beyond capacity in the southern Gaza Strip. A pediatric doctor at Kamal Adwan Hospital said evacuating would likely cause the deaths of seven newborns in the ICU who were connected to ventilators.

Dr. Abu Sitta said that Israel’s evacuation order forced the Mohammed al-Durra Pediatric Hospital east of Gaza City to close, including a neonatal intensive care unit supported by the charity he volunteers with, Medical Aid for Palestinians.

The sick and wounded, including children and pregnant women, have not been allowed to cross Rafah into Egypt or the Erez crossing into Israel to receive treatment. Dr. Abbas, the director general of health, said, “We are in desperate need of a safe humanitarian passage for patients immediately, [and] we need field hospitals immediately.”

Electricity

On October 7, Israeli authorities cut the electricity it delivers to Gaza, the main source of electricity there. Israeli authorities also cut fuel necessary to run Gaza’s only power plant. The power plant has since run out of fuel and shut down. On October 17, Dr. Abbas told Human Rights Watch by phone that hospitals’ emergency generators will run out of fuel “within hours.”

The International Committee of the Red Cross regional director warned on October 11 that the power cuts are “putting newborns in incubators and elderly patients on oxygen at risk. Kidney dialysis stops, and X-rays can’t be taken. Without electricity, hospitals risk turning into morgues.”

Water and Sewage

The UN Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs (OCHA) reported that 97 percent of the groundwater in Gaza is “unfit for human consumption,” leaving people dependent on the supply of water from Israel and on the territory’s desalination plants. Israel cut off all water on October 11, and most desalination also stopped that day due to the cutoff in electricity, leaving about 600,000 people without clean water, Omar Shatat, deputy director general of Gaza’s Coastal Municipalities Water Utility, told Human Rights Watch.

The last functioning desalination plant stopped operating on October 15. Israel partially resumed water delivery that day, but only to the eastern Khan Younis area, and it amounted to less than 4 percent of the water consumed in Gaza prior to October 7, according to OCHA.

UNRWA warned that “people will start dying of severe dehydration” unless access to water is resumed. The Associated Press reported on October 15 that a doctor had treated 15 cases of children with bacterial dysentery due to lack of clean water, which can also cause diseases like cholera, particularly in children under 5.

“Israel has cut off the most basic goods necessary for survival in Gaza, where there are more than a million children at risk,” Van Esveld said. “Every hour that this blockade continues costs lives.”

END

WIKIPEDIA

BLOCKADE OF THE GAZA STRIP

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blockade_of_the_Gaza_Strip

Reacties uitgeschakeld voor NOTE 4/RESIST!

Opgeslagen onder Divers

NOTE 3/RESIST!

[3]

”The Israeli government’s plan to remove troops and Jewish settlements from the Gaza Strip would not end Israel’s occupation of the territory. As an occupying power, Israel will retain responsibility for the welfare of Gaza’s civilian population.

Under the “disengagement” plan endorsed Tuesday by the Knesset, Israeli forces will keep control over Gaza’s borders, coastline and airspace, and will reserve the right to launch incursions at will. Israel will continue to wield overwhelming power over the territory’s economy and its access to trade.”

HUMAN RIGHTS WATCH

ISRAEL: ”DISENGAGEMENT” WILL NOT

END GAZA OCCUPATION

28 OCTOBER 2004

https://www.hrw.org/news/2004/10/28/israel-disengagement-will-not-end-gaza-occupation

The Israeli government’s plan to remove troops and Jewish settlements from the Gaza Strip would not end Israel’s occupation of the territory. As an occupying power, Israel will retain responsibility for the welfare of Gaza’s civilian population.

Under the “disengagement” plan endorsed Tuesday by the Knesset, Israeli forces will keep control over Gaza’s borders, coastline and airspace, and will reserve the right to launch incursions at will. Israel will continue to wield overwhelming power over the territory’s economy and its access to trade.

“The removal of settlers and most military forces will not end Israel’s control over Gaza,” said Sarah Leah Whitson, Executive Director of Human Rights Watch’s Middle East and North Africa Division. “Israel plans to reconfigure its occupation of the territory, but it will remain an occupying power with responsibility for the welfare of the civilian population.”

Under the plan, Israel is scheduled to remove settlers and military bases protecting the settlers from the Gaza Strip and four isolated West Bank Jewish settlements by the end of 2005. The Israeli military will remain deployed on Gaza’s southern border, and will reposition its forces to other areas just outside the territory.

In addition to controlling the borders, coastline and airspace, Israel will continue to control Gaza’s telecommunications, water, electricity and sewage networks, as well as the flow of people and goods into and out of the territory. Gaza will also continue to use Israeli currency.

A World Bank study on the economic effects of the plan determined that “disengagement” would ease restrictions on mobility inside Gaza. But the study also warned that the removal of troops and settlers would have little positive effect unless accompanied by an opening of Gaza’s borders. If the borders are sealed to labor and trade, the plan “would create worse hardship than is seen today.”

The plan also explicitly envisions continued home demolitions by the Israeli military to expand the “buffer zone” along the Gaza-Egypt border. According to a report released last week by Human Rights Watch, the Israeli military has illegally razed nearly 1,600 homes since 2000 to create this buffer zone, displacing some 16,000 Palestinians. Israeli officials have called for the buffer zone to be doubled, which would result in the destruction of one-third of the Rafah refugee camp.

In addition, the plan states that disengagement “will serve to dispel the claims regarding Israel’s responsibility for the Palestinians in the Gaza Strip.” A report by legal experts from the Israeli Justice Ministry, Foreign Ministry and the military made public on Sunday, however, reportedly acknowledges that disengagement “does not necessarily exempt Israel from responsibility in the evacuated territories.”

If Israel removes its troops from Gaza, the Palestinian National Authority will maintain responsibility for security within the territory—to the extent that Israel allows Palestinian police the authority and capacity. Palestinian security forces will still have a duty to protect civilians within Gaza and to prevent indiscriminate attacks on Israeli civilians.

“Under international law, the test for determining whether an occupation exists is effective control by a hostile army, not the positioning of troops,” Whitson said. “Whether the Israeli army is inside Gaza or redeployed around its periphery and restricting entrance and exit, it remains in control.”

Under international law, the duties of an occupying power are detailed in the Fourth Geneva Convention and The Hague Regulations. According to The Hague Regulations, a “territory is considered occupied when it is actually placed under the authority of the hostile army. The occupation extends only to the territory where such authority has been established and can be exercised.”

The “disengagement plan,” as adopted by the Israeli Cabinet on June 6, 2004, and endorsed by the Knesset on October 26, is available at:
http://www.pmo.gov.il/nr/exeres/C5E1ACE3-9834-414E-9512-8E5F509E9A4D.htm.

END

“Israel has the responsibility as the Occupying Power to protect the civilian population. But instead of allowing a healthy people and economy to flourish, Israeli authorities have sealed off the Gaza Strip”

UNITED NATIONS

COLLECTIVE PUNISHMENT IN GAZA MUST END:

ISRAEL’S BLOCKADE ENTERS IN IT’S 7TH YEAR-

UN SPECIAL RAPPORTEUR

14 JUNE 2013

https://www.ohchr.org/en/press-releases/2013/06/collective-punishment-gaza-must-end-israels-blockade-enters-its-7th-year-un

GENEVA, 14 June 2013 – The United Nations Special Rapporteur on the situation of human rights in the Palestinian territories occupied by Israel since 1967, Richard Falk, called today on Israel to end its blockade over the Gaza Strip, six years after it was tightened following the Hamas takeover in June 2007. The human suffering of the land, sea and air blockade imposed on the 1.75 million Palestinians living in one of the most densely populated and impoverished areas of the world has been devastating.

“Six years of Israel’s calculated strangulation of the Gaza Strip has stunted the economy and has kept most Gazans in a state of perpetual poverty and aid dependency,” said the UN expert. “Whether it is fishermen unable to go beyond six nautical miles from the shore, farmers unable to access their land near the Israeli fence, businessmen suffering from severe restrictions on the export of goods, students denied access to education in the West Bank, or patients in need of urgent medical attention refused access to Palestinian hospitals in the West Bank, the destructive designs of blockade have been felt by every single household in Gaza. It is especially felt by Palestinian families separated by the blockade,” he added.

“The people of Gaza have endured the unendurable and suffered what is insufferable for six years. Israel’s collective punishment of the civilian population in Gaza must end today,” said the Special Rapporteur.

“Israel has the responsibility as the Occupying Power to protect the civilian population. But instead of allowing a healthy people and economy to flourish, Israeli authorities have sealed off the Gaza Strip. According to statistics released by the Israeli Ministry of Defense, last month’s exports out of Gaza consisted of 49 truckloads of empty boxes, three truckloads of spices, one truckload of cut flowers, and one truckload of furniture,” he said. In 2012, the total number of truckloads of exports leaving Gaza was 254, compared to 9,787 in 2005 before the tightening of the blockade.

“It does not take an economist to figure out that such a trickle of goods out of Gaza is not the basis of a viable economy,” noted the UN expert. “The easing of the blockade announced by Israel in June 2010 after its deadly assault on the flotilla of ships carrying aid to the besieged population resulted only in an increase in consumer goods entering Gaza, and has not improved living conditions for most Gazans. Since 2007, the productive capacity of Gaza has dwindled with 80 percent of factories in Gaza now closed or operating at half capacity or less due to the loss of export markets and prohibitively high operating costs as a result of the blockade. 34 percent of Gaza’s workforce is unemployed including up to half the youth population, 44 percent of Gazans are food insecure, 80 percent of Gazans are aid recipients,” he said.

“To make matters worse, 90 percent of the water from the Gaza aquifer is unsafe for human consumption without treatment, and severe fuel and electricity shortage results in outages of up to 12 hours a day. Only a small proportion of Gazans who can afford to obtain supplies through the tunnel economy are buffered from the full blow of the blockade, but tunnels alone cannot meet the daily needs of the population in Gaza.”

“Last year, the United Nations forecast that under existing conditions, Gaza would be uninhabitable by 2020. Less optimistic forecasts presented to me were that the Gaza Strip may no longer be viable only three years from now,” said the Special Rapporteur. “It’s clear that the Israeli authorities set out six years ago to devitalize the Gazan population and economy,” he said, referring to a study undertaken by the Israeli Ministry of Defense in early 2008 detailing the minimum number of calories Palestinians in Gaza need to consume on a daily basis to avoid malnutrition. The myriad of restrictions imposed by Israel do not permit civilians in Gaza to develop to their full potential, and enjoy and exercise fully their human rights.

END

Reacties uitgeschakeld voor NOTE 3/RESIST!

Opgeslagen onder Divers

NOTE 2/RESIST!

[2]
BBC
TRUMP’S 20-POINT GAZA PEACE PLAN IN FULL
9 OCTOBER 2025
SEE FOR THE WHOLE TEXT, NOTE 1

Reacties uitgeschakeld voor NOTE 2/RESIST!

Opgeslagen onder Divers

NOTE 1/RESIST!

[1]
BBC
TRUMP’S 20-POINT GAZA PEACE PLAN IN FULL
9 OCTOBER 2025

US President Donald Trump says Israel and Hamas have “signed off on the first phase” of his 20-point Gaza peace plan, in a major step towards a permanent end to two years of war.

He unveiled the plan at the White House on 29 September alongside Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, who said Israel accepted the terms.

On 3 October, Hamas said it agreed to return all 48 remaining hostages being held in Gaza in exchange for Palestinian prisoners in Israeli jails and Gaza detainees, and to the idea of handing over the governance of Gaza to Palestinian technocrats.

But the group did not mention other elements, most notably the requirement that it disarm.

Once the ceasefire takes effect, US, Qatari, Egyptian and Turkish mediators will attempt to get both sides to agree what Trump called a “strong, durable, and everlasting peace”.

Here is the full text of the president’s plan, as provided by the White House:

1. Gaza will be a deradicalised terror-free zone that does not pose a threat to its neighbours.

2. Gaza will be redeveloped for the benefit of the people of Gaza, who have suffered more than enough.

3. If both sides agree to this proposal, the war will immediately end. Israeli forces will withdraw to the agreed upon line to prepare for a hostage release. During this time, all military operations, including aerial and artillery bombardment, will be suspended, and battle lines will remain frozen until conditions are met for the complete staged withdrawal.

4. Within 72 hours of Israel publicly accepting this agreement, all hostages, alive and deceased, will be returned.

5. Once all hostages are released, Israel will release 250 life sentence prisoners plus 1,700 Gazans who were detained after 7 October 2023, including all women and children detained in that context. For every Israeli hostage whose remains are released, Israel will release the remains of 15 deceased Gazans.

6. Once all hostages are returned, Hamas members who commit to peaceful co-existence and to decommission their weapons will be given amnesty. Members of Hamas who wish to leave Gaza will be provided safe passage to receiving countries.

7. Upon acceptance of this agreement, full aid will be immediately sent into the Gaza Strip. At a minimum, aid quantities will be consistent with what was included in the 19 January 2025 agreement regarding humanitarian aid, including rehabilitation of infrastructure (water, electricity, sewage), rehabilitation of hospitals and bakeries, and entry of necessary equipment to remove rubble and open roads.

8. Entry of distribution and aid in the Gaza Strip will proceed without interference from the two parties through the United Nations and its agencies, and the Red Crescent, in addition to other international institutions not associated in any manner with either party. Opening the Rafah crossing in both directions will be subject to the same mechanism implemented under 19 January 2025 agreement.

9. Gaza will be governed under the temporary transitional governance of a technocratic, apolitical Palestinian committee, responsible for delivering the day-to-day running of public services and municipalities for the people in Gaza. This committee will be made up of qualified Palestinians and international experts, with oversight and supervision by a new international transitional body, the “Board of Peace,” which will be headed and chaired by President Donald J. Trump, with other members and heads of state to be announced, including Former Prime Minister Tony Blair. This body will set the framework and handle the funding for the redevelopment of Gaza until such time as the Palestinian Authority has completed its reform programme, as outlined in various proposals, including President Trump’s peace plan in 2020 and the Saudi-French proposal, and can securely and effectively take back control of Gaza. This body will call on best international standards to create modern and efficient governance that serves the people of Gaza and is conducive to attracting investment.

10. A Trump economic development plan to rebuild and energise Gaza will be created by convening a panel of experts who have helped birth some of the thriving modern miracle cities in the Middle East. Many thoughtful investment proposals and exciting development ideas have been crafted by well-meaning international groups, and will be considered to synthesize the security and governance frameworks to attract and facilitate these investments that will create jobs, opportunity, and hope for future Gaza.

11. A special economic zone will be established with preferred tariff and access rates to be negotiated with participating countries.

12. No one will be forced to leave Gaza, and those who wish to leave will be free to do so and free to return. We will encourage people to stay and offer them the opportunity to build a better Gaza.

13. Hamas and other factions agree to not have any role in the governance of Gaza, directly, indirectly, or in any form. All military, terror, and offensive infrastructure, including tunnels and weapon production facilities, will be destroyed and not rebuilt. There will be a process of demilitarisation of Gaza under the supervision of independent monitors, which will include placing weapons permanently beyond use through an agreed process of decommissioning, and supported by an internationally funded buy back and reintegration programme all verified by the independent monitors. New Gaza will be fully committed to building a prosperous economy and to peaceful coexistence with their neighbours.

14. A guarantee will be provided by regional partners to ensure that Hamas, and the factions, comply with their obligations and that New Gaza poses no threat to its neighbours or its people.

15. The United States will work with Arab and international partners to develop a temporary International Stabilisation Force (ISF) to immediately deploy in Gaza. The ISF will train and provide support to vetted Palestinian police forces in Gaza, and will consult with Jordan and Egypt who have extensive experience in this field. This force will be the long-term internal security solution. The ISF will work with Israel and Egypt to help secure border areas, along with newly trained Palestinian police forces. It is critical to prevent munitions from entering Gaza and to facilitate the rapid and secure flow of goods to rebuild and revitalize Gaza. A deconfliction mechanism will be agreed upon by the parties.

16. Israel will not occupy or annex Gaza. As the ISF establishes control and stability, the Israel Defense Forces (IDF) will withdraw based on standards, milestones, and timeframes linked to demilitarization that will be agreed upon between the IDF, ISF, the guarantors, and the United States, with the objective of a secure Gaza that no longer poses a threat to Israel, Egypt, or its citizens. Practically, the IDF will progressively hand over the Gaza territory it occupies to the ISF according to an agreement they will make with the transitional authority until they are withdrawn completely from Gaza, save for a security perimeter presence that will remain until Gaza is properly secure from any resurgent terror threat.

17. In the event Hamas delays or rejects this proposal, the above, including the scaled-up aid operation, will proceed in the terror-free areas handed over from the IDF to the ISF.

18. An interfaith dialogue process will be established based on the values of tolerance and peaceful co-existence to try and change mindsets and narratives of Palestinians and Israelis by emphasizing the benefits that can be derived from peace.

19. While Gaza re-development advances and when the PA reform programme is faithfully carried out, the conditions may finally be in place for a credible pathway to Palestinian self-determination and statehood, which we recognise as the aspiration of the Palestinian people.

20. The United States will establish a dialogue between Israel and the Palestinians to agree on a political horizon for peaceful and prosperous co-existence.

END

Reacties uitgeschakeld voor NOTE 1/RESIST!

Opgeslagen onder Divers