mei 4, 2026 · 1:48 pm

NOTES 16 AND 17/PRIDE

16]
[17]
AI OVERVIEW
2. The Historical Context: “Social Death”
In the Regency period, “social death” was not a metaphor, but a merciless reality with devastating consequences:
  • Family Contamination: If Anthony (the head of the family!) had married an opera singer, he would not be the only one excluded. The entire Bridgerton family would have been struck from all guest lists immediately.
  • Marriage Prospects of the Sisters: For Daphne, Eloise, Francesca, and Hyacinth, the damage would be irreparable. No nobleman of standing would propose to a girl whose brother had “married into the gutter.” They would effectively be doomed to a life as unmarried aunts on the sidelines.
  • Economic and Political Isolation: A Viscount’s power lay in his network. Without access to the clubs, the balls, and the political circles of the ton, Anthony would completely lose his influence and, with it, the ability to protect his family’s interests.
  • The “Demimonde”: Siena belonged to the demimonde (the half-world). While men of the aristocracy were permitted to frequent this world for amusement, crossing the line through marriage was considered the ultimate sin.
OTHER AI OVERVIEW
AI OVERVIEW
Your assessment of the social dynamics in the Bridgerton TV series regarding Anthony Bridgerton and the opera singer Siena Rosso is accurate to the historical context of the Regency Era (1811–1820). 
Here is a breakdown of why that relationship was forced into hiding:
  • The Reputation of Performers: During the Regency, women who performed on stage—including actresses and opera singers—were frequently viewed as “immoral” or “loose women” by the upper-class “Ton”. Because they performed in public for money and were financially independent, they were seen as improper compared to the secluded, sheltered lives of aristocratic women.
  • The “No-Go” Area of Marriage: A marriage between an aristocrat (like a Viscount) and a singer was considered a scandal, often seen as a mésalliance (a marriage with someone of lower social status) that would ruin his family’s reputation. This is why Lady Violet, Anthony’s mother, would have considered such a match an impossibility.
  • Public Constraints: The social stigma meant that public outings were forbidden for such couples. They could not “wine and dine” in fashionable Mayfair restaurants, promenade in popular spots like Kew Gardens, or show themselves together at Almack’s.
  • Isolation in Private: Due to these extreme social restrictions, their relationship was confined entirely to private spaces, most notably behind closed doors, to avoid ruining Anthony’s standing in society

Reacties uitgeschakeld voor NOTES 16 AND 17/PRIDE

Opgeslagen onder Divers

· 1:47 pm

NOTES 13 T/M 15/PRIDE

[13]
[14]
[15]
AI OVERVIEW
2. The Historical Context: “Social Death”
In the Regency period, “social death” was not a metaphor, but a merciless reality with devastating consequences:
  • Family Contamination: If Anthony (the head of the family!) had married an opera singer, he would not be the only one excluded. The entire Bridgerton family would have been struck from all guest lists immediately.
  • Marriage Prospects of the Sisters: For Daphne, Eloise, Francesca, and Hyacinth, the damage would be irreparable. No nobleman of standing would propose to a girl whose brother had “married into the gutter.” They would effectively be doomed to a life as unmarried aunts on the sidelines.
  • Economic and Political Isolation: A Viscount’s power lay in his network. Without access to the clubs, the balls, and the political circles of the ton, Anthony would completely lose his influence and, with it, the ability to protect his family’s interests.
  • The “Demimonde”: Siena belonged to the demimonde (the half-world). While men of the aristocracy were permitted to frequent this world for amusement, crossing the line through marriage was considered the ultimate sin.
OTHER AI OVERVIEW
AI OVERVIEW
Your assessment of the social dynamics in the Bridgerton TV series regarding Anthony Bridgerton and the opera singer Siena Rosso is accurate to the historical context of the Regency Era (1811–1820). 
Here is a breakdown of why that relationship was forced into hiding:
  • The Reputation of Performers: During the Regency, women who performed on stage—including actresses and opera singers—were frequently viewed as “immoral” or “loose women” by the upper-class “Ton”. Because they performed in public for money and were financially independent, they were seen as improper compared to the secluded, sheltered lives of aristocratic women.
  • The “No-Go” Area of Marriage: A marriage between an aristocrat (like a Viscount) and a singer was considered a scandal, often seen as a mésalliance (a marriage with someone of lower social status) that would ruin his family’s reputation. This is why Lady Violet, Anthony’s mother, would have considered such a match an impossibility.
  • Public Constraints: The social stigma meant that public outings were forbidden for such couples. They could not “wine and dine” in fashionable Mayfair restaurants, promenade in popular spots like Kew Gardens, or show themselves together at Almack’s.
  • Isolation in Private: Due to these extreme social restrictions, their relationship was confined entirely to private spaces, most notably behind closed doors, to avoid ruining Anthony’s standing in society

Reacties uitgeschakeld voor NOTES 13 T/M 15/PRIDE

Opgeslagen onder Divers

· 1:45 pm

NOTE 12/PRIDE

[12]
AI OVERVIEW
[THE DIALOGUE IS NOT LITERARY SAID LIKE THIS, BUT REFLECTS
ACCURATELY THE FRAGMENTS OF CONVERSATIONS IN WHICH
VIOLETS DEHUMANIZES SIENA AND THE LOVE LIFE OF HER SON,
BLACKMAILING HIM EMOTIONALLY]
Violet: “Your father has been gone ten years now, Anthony. Ten years in which I have watched you struggle to become the man he was. But a man such as he was would never abandon his family for a sinful infatuation.”
Anthony: “It is no infatuation, Mother. And my duties to this family stand apart from this.”
Violet: “Nothing stands apart! Every choice you make reflects upon your sisters. How do you expect Daphne to find a suitable match if her brother, the Viscount, spends his nights in the beds of opera singers? You do not only besmirch yourself; you besmirch the future of your sisters. You must choose: either you are the head of this house, or you are a man who follows his passions. You cannot be both.”
Anthony: “You are asking me to deny my heart.”
Violet: “I am asking you to honor your name. The time for play is over. Tomorrow the Season begins, and I expect you to be there—fully committed to your family, and not to that woman.”
https://www.google.com/search?q=Were+excuses+from+parents+revolutionary+in+Regency+Era&sca_esv=ecdd595061634c79&sxsrf=ANbL-n7deX26M3mOiqW9aaVlX2hOC0wlIA%3A1777085700827&ei=BC3saZSZMpOAi-gP3d7imQs&biw=1280&bih=585&ved=2ahUKEwjb-6eogIiUAxX-1QIHHYm_JVsQ0NsOegQIAxAB&uact=5&sclient=gws-wiz-serp&fbs=ADc_l-YGrpJMQtvjQ6h14rj-dfIrGHtbS2sKx-L4Fs6XrHXZTuIAorsV4kq4VWGgn0gISA80VqBSPIYdptYkeGfZOu5oTrPDDxqnJSjIIOAGHIdNjMIhRh9IvH8cJ1XPm0l9qrFSzcdR1IggvRCMsUA1rGAFWL6RJmtLzxxP3L5OFfvm4p-6ZDC8svDZYxd6KQKktOskFc_Y&aep=10&ntc=1&mstk=AUtExfDFQ1VeGdHeRgtcPPXh2zg5jKBm9hMC7rbbZJU5cMRCSXZWt3ABx8AKfVgUqmwYQii83xUdk1tth9fLq4CaRBLwHdMitMRA6RcUD4Qwqphm9DF7sbOkWHrvKoOrj65i8fACikSZ4QHCxTrcLEBiXyLJ4RXnHcYulQoP9OLlFdpucCNUjnc43Zl-mTSIXuVNVHM5oRlESVVxo-zt03SZaIbbrMWW8e_jTzaK52g70Tl8zYjF2WG5BwnrB2dxFtCO5yrbamT42wORk4h4fV3VcZ5YvGHFfLHRdfXG9r_sc0zkQIBzpV7ERxXgg0Kd8tEuMAAcctlZZw6bnhWhLS9esqjQ3Cu8SiYoTw&csuir=1&mtid=hi3sac-CCbPoi-gPnJ2x6QY&udm=50

Reacties uitgeschakeld voor NOTE 12/PRIDE

Opgeslagen onder Divers

· 1:44 pm

NOTE 11/PRIDE

[11]
AI OVERVIEW
AI OVERVIEW
2. The Historical Context: “Social Death”
In the Regency period, “social death” was not a metaphor, but a merciless reality with devastating consequences:
  • Family Contamination: If Anthony (the head of the family!) had married an opera singer, he would not be the only one excluded. The entire Bridgerton family would have been struck from all guest lists immediately.
  • Marriage Prospects of the Sisters: For Daphne, Eloise, Francesca, and Hyacinth, the damage would be irreparable. No nobleman of standing would propose to a girl whose brother had “married into the gutter.” They would effectively be doomed to a life as unmarried aunts on the sidelines.
  • Economic and Political Isolation: A Viscount’s power lay in his network. Without access to the clubs, the balls, and the political circles of the ton, Anthony would completely lose his influence and, with it, the ability to protect his family’s interests.
  • The “Demimonde”: Siena belonged to the demimonde (the half-world). While men of the aristocracy were permitted to frequent this world for amusement, crossing the line through marriage was considered the ultimate sin.

Reacties uitgeschakeld voor NOTE 11/PRIDE

Opgeslagen onder Divers

· 1:42 pm

NOTE 10/PRIDE

10]

PARENTIFICATION
AI OVERVIEW
Parentification is a psychological process in which the roles between parent and child are reversed. The child takes on responsibilities that actually belong to the parents, often because the parents are not fully capable of fulfilling them due to circumstances (such as illness, addiction, or emotional immaturity).
Two forms are generally distinguished:
  • Instrumental parentification: The child performs practical tasks, such as cooking, running the household, managing finances, or taking full responsibility for siblings.
  • Emotional parentification: The child acts as emotional support, a confidant, or a mediator for the parent. This is often considered more harmful because it is less visible and directly hinders the child’s emotional development.
Causes and signs
Parentification often arises in families with specific challenges, such as a single parent, chronic illness, mental health issues, or addiction among the parents.
Signs in a child may include:
  • An extremely mature or “well-behaved” appearance (the child who never causes problems).
  • Great difficulty playing or being carefree.
  • A strong sense of responsibility for the happiness of others.
  • Perfectionism and a strong need to prove oneself.
Consequences in adulthood
While parentification can lead to skills like empathy and independence in the short term, it often has negative long-term consequences for well-being:
  • Relationship issues: Difficulty setting boundaries, a tendency to “please” others, or attracting partners who require a lot of care.
  • Emotional complaints: Increased risk of burnout, depression, anxiety disorders, and low self-esteem.
  • Hyper-independence: Feeling the need to do everything alone and being afraid to ask for help.
Recovery
The recovery process often begins with acknowledging the experience. Therapy can help break destructive patterns, learn to recognize one’s own needs, and set healthy boundaries in current relationships.
WIKIPEDIA
PARENTIFICATION

Reacties uitgeschakeld voor NOTE 10/PRIDE

Opgeslagen onder Divers

· 1:41 pm

NOTES 8 AND 9/PRIDE

[8]
[9]
AI OVERVIEW
POSITION OF THE ELDEST SON AND HEIR DURING THE REGENCY ERA
The Position of the Eldest Son and Heir during the Regency Era (circa 1811-1820) in England was of crucial importance for preserving family wealth, status, and titles. This was largely determined by the system of primogeniture and entailment (fee tail).
The Position of the Eldest Son (The Heir)
  • Sole Right of Inheritance: Traditionally, the eldest legitimate son inherited the landed estate, the noble title, and the bulk of the family fortune.
  • Responsibility: He bore the responsibility of upholding the family name, managing the estates, and often providing for his mother (as a widow) and unmarried sisters.
  • Heir Apparent vs. Heir Presumptive: The eldest son was the “heir apparent” (the undeniable heir). If there were no sons, the inheritance passed to an “heir presumptive” (a presumed heir, such as a younger brother, cousin, or uncle).
  • Education and Career: Because his future was secured, the eldest son often had the freedom to live as a “gentleman,” become politically active, or hold a high-ranking position in the military.
The Role of Entailment (Fee Tail)
An “entail” was a legal arrangement ensuring that the estate remained intact and could not be divided among all children. The estate had to remain in the male line, usually passing from father to eldest son.
This meant that if a father had no sons, the estate could pass to a male cousin (as seen in Pride & Prejudice), leaving the daughters with nothing.
Consequences for the Family
  • Younger Sons: They usually inherited very little and had to build their own careers, often in the military, the clergy, or the law.
  • Daughters: They were entirely economically dependent on their father and, later, their husband. They relied on a “dowry” or “portion” (a share of the wealth) that the eldest son was required to pay out to them.
  • Widows:: “Widows were often dependent on a ‘jointure,’ a legal provision made for them in their marriage settlement.”)

Reacties uitgeschakeld voor NOTES 8 AND 9/PRIDE

Opgeslagen onder Divers

· 1:39 pm

NOTE 7/PRIDE

[7]
AI OVERVIEW
POSITION OF THE ELDEST SON AND HEIR DURING THE REGENCY ERA
The Position of the Eldest Son and Heir during the Regency Era (circa 1811-1820) in England was of crucial importance for preserving family wealth, status, and titles. This was largely determined by the system of primogeniture and entailment (fee tail).
The Position of the Eldest Son (The Heir)
  • Sole Right of Inheritance: Traditionally, the eldest legitimate son inherited the landed estate, the noble title, and the bulk of the family fortune.
  • Responsibility: He bore the responsibility of upholding the family name, managing the estates, and often providing for his mother (as a widow) and unmarried sisters.
  • Heir Apparent vs. Heir Presumptive: The eldest son was the “heir apparent” (the undeniable heir). If there were no sons, the inheritance passed to an “heir presumptive” (a presumed heir, such as a younger brother, cousin, or uncle).
  • Education and Career: Because his future was secured, the eldest son often had the freedom to live as a “gentleman,” become politically active, or hold a high-ranking position in the military.
The Role of Entailment (Fee Tail)
An “entail” was a legal arrangement ensuring that the estate remained intact and could not be divided among all children. The estate had to remain in the male line, usually passing from father to eldest son.
This meant that if a father had no sons, the estate could pass to a male cousin (as seen in Pride & Prejudice), leaving the daughters with nothing.
Consequences for the Family
  • Younger Sons: They usually inherited very little and had to build their own careers, often in the military, the clergy, or the law.
  • Daughters: They were entirely economically dependent on their father and, later, their husband. They relied on a “dowry” or “portion” (a share of the wealth) that the eldest son was required to pay out to them.
  • Widows:: “Widows were often dependent on a ‘jointure,’ a legal provision made for them in their marriage settlement.”)

Reacties uitgeschakeld voor NOTE 7/PRIDE

Opgeslagen onder Divers

· 1:38 pm

NOTE 6/PRIDE

6]
SEE ALSO FOR VIOLET’S ROLE IN THE BREAK UP
WITH SIENA ROSSO, NOTE 3

Reacties uitgeschakeld voor NOTE 6/PRIDE

Opgeslagen onder Divers

· 1:35 pm

NOTE 5/PRIDE

5]
”TWO FORMS OF REVENGE
So Anthony’s coldness against his mother is his revenge for the way
she destroyed his deep love affair with Siena [62]
But also his insistment to ”marry for duty” was not only
self protection against his deep love grief because of Siena, but also
to hurt his mother, which is understandable, not only because
of all the pain she inflicted on him, but also because now of a sudden
she wants him to ”marry for love”, while she in Season 1 was nagging and
whining about his ”duties” [63], costing him his happiness with Siena [64A]
No wonder he found her manipulative and hypocritical [64]”
…..
…..
”For that dehumanization, as Violet’s destructive role in
the break up with Siena [blackmailing with his father’s legacy,
shaming his love, etc], Anthony took that cold attitude to
”punish” his mother, which went so far that he often called her
no mother, but ”Dowager Viscountess” [66A]”
SEE ONE EXAMPLE WHERE ANTHONY REFERS TO HIS MOTHER
AS ”DOWAGER VISCOUNTESS”
NOTE 66A FROM THIS LINK
[66A]
Violet: “Anthony, you cannot simply ignore your responsibilities to this family. You are the Viscount!”
Anthony (icy and fierce):
“Do not lecture me on my responsibilities! I have spent every waking hour of every day since my father died fulfilling those responsibilities. I have sacrificed EVERYTHING for this family! My youth, my desires, my… my very soul has been dedicated to ensuring the survival of the Bridgerton name!”
Violet: “I only want you to find happiness, Anthony. The kind of happiness your father and I shared.”
Anthony:
“Happiness? You speak of happiness as if it is a simple choice. You forget that while you were drowning in your grief, I was the one who had to hold this family together. I have done my duty. I am doing my duty now by finding a wife who is suitable. If that does not meet the Dowager Viscountess’s exacting standards of ‘romance’, then that is a burden she must learn to bear.
 
 
SEE ALSO AI CONVERSATION
IN DUTCH
 
 
https://www.google.com/search?q=Violet%3A+Ik+heb+gefaald+als+moeder%2C+Anthony.+Ik+was+zo+bang+voor+schandalen%2C+zo+bang+om+de+controle+te+verliezen%2C+dat+ik+vergat+te+kijken+naar+wat+jij+nodig+had.+Ik+heb+je+te+zware+lasten+laten+dragen+en+ik+heb+je+offers+laten+brengen+die+een+hart+kunnen+breken.+Anthony+%28na+een+lange+stilte%2C+nog+steeds+met+afstand%29%3A+Het+verleden+is+het+verleden%2C+moeder.+Uw+excuses+veranderen+de+offers+niet.+Maar+ik+zal+mijn+plicht+blijven+doen.+%2FEngelse+vertaling+graag&sca_esv=e5a82f36d3850ce9&biw=1280&bih=585&sxsrf=ANbL-n583imer1pvxmAvLE8_bUavSwwJ0A%3A1775696432450&ei=MPrWabCaG6-F9u8PqrK10Ac&ved=2ahUKEwi8jazH0d-TAxXrhf0HHevoAfcQ0NsOegQIAxAB&uact=5&sclient=gws-wiz-serp&fbs=ADc_l-YGrpJMQtvjQ6h14rj-dfIrGHtbS2sKx-L4Fs6XrHXZTgGannR8EMMZSoXcZI253NkQbXHBm2OWC8p5lK2U3SVcp8m5BYStzn5KlLBtbc7HHr2mPQGkrncwZGc6cwKew5W_iU5RkxOf6m_4Ua3Ga8CAazxaOVmpDHKcYfhRoNIRfqh5vlxDvy7enN1TqlaNTSMQ1i9v&aep=10&ntc=1&mstk=AUtExfAQiCry_syQRBvVOF9ruGXkyL3_sRRXcyE8kE3NaOW6b9bLiCWe-J7XNNXcqMUFCL_O44aG88vkwFImTaE8uDsknxCm7lGnpSn6n9-xawWrDE4MJYB4vFgMurR07uGudjEvgHXtnJa7pL3VRplrKWA1axhxcZMq6h9OEdrwnifWhGETMHWkuqAvRTzBmWjTJP5mwCpv-kZXtaFEwriTtp5zJrhkcBOpHIXUcr6drsvPPEpAtRzLSFG2SH428dh3nGrujomPzVbwRnUHb1bi7FvWzJg87OZTdfjdjfGFi5zxYszcf0crkHPnsjcUXgJQVeQbkRQbgNY5og&csuir=1&mtid=0gTXaa-UL6Ko9u8P5s2N6QI&udm=50
AI OVERVIEW
The psychological impact of the ‘Silent Treatment’ Anthony employed toward Violet after his breakup with Siena is a crucial aspect of his character development in Season 2. Instead of open conflict, Anthony chose an emotional wall, which served as a powerful defense mechanism. Below is a deeper analysis of its impact:
The Wall as Protection and Punishment
Anthony’s icy aloofness was intended not only to protect himself but also to punish his mother for her prior interference.
  • Emotional Disconnection: After the pain of the breakup with Siena, Anthony decided that “feeling” was dangerous. By denying Violet access to his inner world, he prevented her from influencing or hurting him again.
  • Passive Aggression: The ‘Silent Treatment’ manifested as a strictly formal interaction. By addressing her only in her role as Dowager Viscountess, he reduced their relationship to a business transaction, which was a deep source of grief for a loving mother like Violet.
The Psychological Impact on Violet
For Violet, her eldest son’s silence was a form of emotional torture that constantly mirrored her own failures.
  • The Loss of Trust: Violet realized that Anthony no longer trusted her with his emotions. Every attempt on her part to speak of love was met with a cold reminder of “duty.”
  • Guilt and Powerlessness: The silence forced Violet into self-reflection. She realized that her past “social panic” and temporary emotional absence following Edmund’s death had traumatized Anthony. Her inability to break through his wall eventually led to her revolutionary apology at the end of Season 2.
 
https://www.google.com/search?q=Do+not+lecture+me+on+my+responsibilities%21+I+have+spent+every+waking+hour+of+every+day+since+my+father+died+fulfilling+those+responsibilities.+I+have+sacrificed+EVERYTHING+for+this+family%21+My+youth%2C+my+desires%2C+my…+my+very+soul+has+been+dedicated+to+ensuring+the+survival+of+the+Bridgerton+name%21&sca_esv=75e6d7a8c6f57b91&sxsrf=ANbL-n4C4fdX6cwRLIDfGDEy0W7BiLY40w%3A1775970186652&ei=iifbadarJuKvi-gPsqWfyAg&iflsig=AFdpzrgAAAAAads1mjj7X2cA_fRxZh_uxwbngMUylRKG&ved=2ahUKEwiY_bfCxOeTAxXF1wIHHUcHAcsQ0NsOegQIAxAB&uact=5&sclient=gws-wiz&fbs=ADc_l-YGrpJMQtvjQ6h14rj-dfIrGHtbS2sKx-L4Fs6XrHXZTuIAorsV4kq4VWGgn0gISA80VqBSPIYdptYkeGfZOu5obXAaFwTthj8KLIVKrYTcW9ctVHjP0gjHy9Z5hbIW51oAyrM_MOn81hGGXq579570PNWs_iq5To7d7kOazc-LQOcc_ag4E-3XfFZYZHgAHyfiBOjd&aep=10&ntc=1&mstk=AUtExfBOI2VgRATCWlnWMB0HYNgSOwZdjyDqiHRmofsuj4c_il7prsABhhyUU7cYDueFg5dWHaWYWgBgKJihAaNJJ0c_castAFDKG9Pf6Nb9ielm-H2ihNQcXnzlg6ZJsv2UCDgJpXgiR8ISZaDtzJwdkmTtZUYeuutgNYbMEGz81KH8pvRYNAAaeBQ3JclIAIteVmoKgKIHS1plQVZfY5IbIVd7wXySQ64Bn3o8CvW3wI7ii1PjBkLpmw2jIe8d1GTCuKkeh_gQHNCuhIQaAOhjQHmC9lfKmIbPjPf4OCuZ6ush7oUIMYhAEcu_PnYL_vkny4NX7D6wepxIlg&csuir=1&mtid=FSjbaerXEezLi-gPrPGPkQU&udm=50
AI OVERVIEW
The Architecture of Retaliation: Punishing the Lack of Compassion
Anthony’s coldness toward Violet in Season 2 is not just a general resentment of duty; it is a specific, targeted response to her destructive role in his past and her total failure to show him empathy:
  • The Debt of Compassion: Anthony punishes Violet with silence and distance because she offered him no warmth when he was losing Siena. By treating his greatest heartbreak as a mere social inconvenience, she forfeited her right to his emotional intimacy.
  • The Calculated Chill: His “lukewarm” reaction to her later apologies is a form of justice. He is showing her what a world without compassion looks like—the very world she forced him into when she sabotaged his relationship with Siena.
  • An Unforgivable Betrayal: For Anthony, the fact that his own mother was the architect of his misery makes the wound impossible to heal. He cannot “warm up” to her because he no longer trusts her with his heart; she proved in Season 1 that she would gladly crush it to protect the family name.
  • A Mirror to Her Hardness: By being cold and business-like, Anthony is simply giving Violet a taste of her own medicine. He has become the rigid, emotionless Viscount she demanded, and now she is forced to live with the consequences of that transformation.
The Bottom Line: Anthony’s resentment is rooted in the fact that Violet saw his suffering as a necessary sacrifice rather than a human tragedy. His distance is the only way he can protect the remaining pieces of his soul from further “good intentions.”

https://www.google.com/search?q=Astrid+Essed+on+Bridgerton&sca_esv=2e99a46b27150d47&sxsrf=ANbL-n5B157PWMQPfOdEjwWw7NkBH3UOXQ%3A1776897806078&source=hp&ei=Dk_paaCFA9moi-gPsdnfyAg&iflsig=AFdpzrgAAAAAaeldHqGdCaU6SYW8KH2345pMEXVhZQ8t&aep=16&csuir=1&mstk=AUtExfCyPm_IWfCBYc99n93dPbKhYU-XEo81Gvxxom82Jx2eDuHD2Y4sPSDaW2qEHR3cubRs2XtzG_hF27Y9sNiRH3clprYI5kbenJ5IEwkrb7apR9DOceDSPiTuDOVY-lVaNzCQBYakaErNhpZy8LxGQ58I28uhKsZPlbdRxqKtzEZdYwKhm0IxdsIAfQLhAUEpjkZzybcBOlHmIzDL7hY0aLfJPSLijGQE7W_ESghfFf6mAjz_PdARnVSSD033L4NaK-WQGP92qpKv_KIiq8j32DR9Q4ANpSCEUEcEJJe6NSbTO2n7hw6dfJL49LPp_LYWo1tQZoSC9cVeGg&oq=As&gs_lp=Egdnd3Mtd2l6IgJBcyoCCAIyChAjGPAFGCcYngYyBBAjGCcyChAjGPAFGCcYngYyCBAAGIAEGLEDMggQABiABBixAzILEAAYgAQYsQMYgwEyDhAAGIAEGLEDGIMBGIoFMgUQABiABDILEAAYgAQYsQMYgwEyCBAAGIAEGLEDSMsfUABYqQFwAHgAkAEAmAFCoAGBAaoBATK4AQHIAQD4AQGYAgKgAqABwgIKECMYgAQYJxiKBcICChAAGIAEGEMYigWYAwCSBwEyoAenG7IHATK4B6ABwgcDMy0yyAcagAgA&sclient=gws-wiz&mtid=IMrUaZHpMbiJ9u8Pra28-QM&udm=50

Reacties uitgeschakeld voor NOTE 5/PRIDE

Opgeslagen onder Divers

· 1:33 pm

NOTE 4/PRIDE

[4]
SIENA ROSSO
But it got even worse.
Anthony met with operasinger Siena Rosso and fell desperately in love. [7]
And I say ”desperately”, because a possible marriage with an operasinger
was a no go in Regency Era, leading to immediate social death
to the whole Bridgerton Family, especially because Anthony was the
Head of the Family [8]
So Violet’s concerns about the love affair of her son Anthony and Siena
Rosso were understandable, in the light of her real fear of the social death [9],
but that was not the point.
The point was her total lack of motherly compassion and warmth [at a certain moment
she knew it was more than an ”infatuation” [10] and her dehumanization
of Siena Rosso, calling her ”a certain soprano” [11], without taking into account the emotional effect on her son.

Reacties uitgeschakeld voor NOTE 4/PRIDE

Opgeslagen onder Divers